Preview

Ban on Smoking in Public Places

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
458 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ban on Smoking in Public Places
Smoking ban in public places has been a hot issue these last months not only in Malta but also in various countries who are discussing the effects a ban would have. There have been several debates on smoking ban. Even though the harmful effects of smoking, both active and passive, are well known and undeniable smoking is far from being in decline; it is spreading among young people in particular quickly.

Most controversial debate is going on public smoking ban. The reason is simple, smoking ban affects directly all people rapidly and we can see its effects in a short-term period. There have been a lot of arguments brought up both in favour and against a public smoking ban. Some of the arguments in favour are the following. Smoking ban is one of the controversial ways for reducing smoking and recognizing non-smokers' right to health protection. The health risks of smoking are clear. Passive smoking does carry risks. Many leading medical and scientific organizations recognize second hand smoke as a cause of a range of life-threatening conditions. The health situation could be drastically improved if one of the risk factors - tobacco - was eliminated. People have a right to protect themselves from smoke inhalation. People shouldn't have to inhale the ill-effects of other people's smoking. The creation of smoke-free public places also improves air quality.

Those opposing a smoking ban say that freedom of choice would be affected by such legislation. Some people against a ban say that smoking bans damage business. A smoking ban could lead to a significant fall in earnings from bars, restaurants and casinos. Another argument is that the smoker has a basic human right to smoke in public places, and the ban is a limitation for smokers' rights. Businesses, smokers, publicans, tobacco industries, stars, and some of the non-smokers oppose public smoking ban. Smokers light a cigarette because they need to smoke, not because they want it, because nicotine is physically

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Many people debate over where government intervention is appropriate and personal freedom should begin. One of these highly discussed topics is banning smoking in public places. The ban of smoking in public has many advantages and reasons. Smoking in public puts innocent adults, teenagers, and children at risk of serious health problems. If smoking is banned in public, this may help lower rates of potential smokers and current smokers as well. The welfare of the nonsmoker and the smoker are both affected by allowing smoking in public. By banning smoking in these areas, the population would be positively influenced.…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Currie, D. (2011, February 8). Study finds city-wide smoking ban reduces risks of preteen birth. _The Nations Health_, 40, 10.…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Smoking vs. Non-Smoking

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In recent years the prohibition of smoking in or on college campuses, places of business, and healthcare facilities has increased dramatically. Some employers are going as far as firing people for smoking even in their own cars or simply smelling like smoke. More and more non-smokers and healthcare professionals have began calling for a ban on the production and sale of cigarettes. I believe outlawing the production and sale of cigarettes may cause more problems than it would help solve. Three important points that are typically pushed aside are: smoking is a choice banning it completely takes away your personal freedom of choice; Outlawing cigarettes may not fully dissolve the problem people will find a way to do it regardless; Banning cigarette sales may have a greater negative impact on our already struggling economy.…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In recent months, dozens of localities and a number of states have enacted sweeping smoking bans. The bans generally forbid smoking in “public” places, which are defined to include not only publicly owned facilities but also privately owned properties to which members of the public are invited (e.g., bars, restaurants, hotel lobbies, etc.). Proponents of the bans insist that they are necessary to reduce risks to public health and welfare and to protect the rights of nonsmoking patrons and employees of the regulated establishments. Specifically, ban advocates have offered three justifications for government-imposed bans: First, they claim that such bans are warranted because indoor smoking involves a “negative externality,” the market failure normally invoked to justify regulation of the ambient environment. In addition, advocates assert that smoking bans shape individual preferences against smoking, thereby reducing the number of smokers in society. Finally, proponents argue that smoking bans are justified, regardless of whether any market failure is present, simply because of the health risks associated with inhalation of environmental tobacco smoke (ets), commonly referred to as “secondhand smoke.” This article contends that government-imposed smoking bans cannot be justified as responses to market failure, as means of shaping preferences, or on risk-reduction grounds. Smoking bans reduce public welfare by preventing an optimal allocation of nonsmoking and smoking-permitted public places. A laissez-faire approach better accommodates heterogeneous preferences regarding public smoking.…

    • 5926 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There has been some debate recently about whether smoking should be banned. Smoking has been considered a controversial issue recently due to many negative effects bring from it. Deborah Arnott, in her article “Legislation to ban tobacco will save thousands of lives” (Guardian, September 2009) suggest that smoking should be banned in all public places and in private as well. While David Hockney ‘s article, entitled “ The anti – smoking bigots should butt out “ (The Guardian Online, September 2008) takes the opposite view : smoking should not be banned . This essay will critically respond to both of these articles.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I remember that when I was child, I saw one public service announcement in the television that was performed by Yul Brynner, who was an actor of "The King and I". In an announcement, he said, "If I hadn't had smoking the cigarette, I would not have talked to you smoking was hazardous the health". An announcement was played after he had died in lung cancer, which was caused by smoking. This announcement gave me deeply impression that cigarette was harmful our health absolutely. However, how many people agree this? Everyday, we hear much news about the people who die from the cancer, which is caused by smoking or passive smoke. It is obvious that smoking not only affects the health of smokers, but also harms other people who are not smoking. So, many people think government should ban the smoking in public place. However, this issue always provides a lot of controversy. Some people say "Yes", some people say "No". Now, we are going to examine what opinion the people have in this issue.…

    • 864 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Smoking

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to a recent estimation by the World Health Organization or “WHO”, it was found that there are about 1.1 billion smokers in the world today. This number is steadily increasing and it is expected to rise to about 1.64 billion by the year 2025. The W.H.O. estimated some four million deaths each year that are caused by tobacco use. It is expected that if smoking were not reduced, then there would be about ten million people dead per year by 2030. If the current smoking trends continue, tobacco is expected to become the leading cause of death worldwide, causing more deaths than HIV, maternal mortality, automobile accidents, homicide and suicide combined. But these implications lie beyond the smoker. Those who are exposed to the smoke are usually innocent bystanders in public places where there is or are smokers present. Not only smokers endanger themselves, but everybody around them. This is cause for enough concern to suggest a ban in public places. This paper will explain that smoking is bad for people and that it should be banned from public places.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Smoking in Public Places

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A smoking ban is a controversial subject. Those who do not smoke, and have never smoked, often feel like there is no reason not to have a public smoking ban. Smokers, however, feel like it is a personal right to be able to smoke in public, and the smoking ban issue is important and personal for them. While this might seem like a new issue, this disagreement surrounding an action to ban smoking in public places has been around for a while.…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As people becoming gradually more thoughtful with living longer and healthier lives, the harmful effects of habits and live styles have come under significant considerations. One of the issues which have been a controversial and mach debated subject within the lifestyle is the issue of smoking in the public places. The British Medical Health Association research has found that at least 1,000 people die in the UK every year as results of passive tobacco smoke. Other people tobacco smoke increases the chance of non-smokers contracting fatal heart, lung and asthmatic diseases has now led the UK government introducing laws to ban smoking in all public places. Such a ban will come into force in England on 1st July 2007 (BBC News, 2007). This ban covers all public places, including pubs, bars, offices, factories train station and buss stops while only privet homes and outdoor areas are excluded (BBC News, 2007). This paper begins by highlighting the arguments against the smoking ban, it will then go on to evaluate recent research in to the drawbacks of passive smoking providing counterarguments supporting smoking should be ban in public places.…

    • 3941 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One possible reason to support the ban is the health concerns and the possible negative effects of cigarette smoke on both the smoker and the non-smoker in the vicinity. Studies have shown that every year hundreds of thousands of people around the world die from diseases caused by smoking cigarettes. The rationale for smoking bans posits that smoking is optional, whereas breathing is not. Therefore, proponents say, smoking bans exist to protect breathing people from the effects of second-hand smoke, which include an increased risk of heart disease, cancer, emphysema, and other diseases. Laws implementing bans on indoor smoking have been introduced by many countries in various forms over the years, with some legislators citing scientific evidence that shows tobacco smoking is harmful to the smokers themselves and to those inhaling second-hand smoke.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay Bout Smoking

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As you can see, there are different opinions regarding this topic. This paper will point out the advantages and disadvantages of smoking in public places. Therefore, there is a need to discuss the issues concerning this topic, which includes the following aspects: development of a young smoking society, the risks of smokers, and nonsmokers, as well as medical support.…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    smoking bans

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The rationale for smoking bans posits that smoking is optional, whereas breathing is not. Therefore, smoking bans exist to protect breathing people from the effect of the second hand smoke, which includes an increased risk of heart disease and cancer. The smoking bans movement started centuries ago, in 1575 by Spanish and Mexicans colonies in Caribbean (Richards, 2008). It was the first regulation to forbid the consumption of tobacco in churches. In the late part of the 20th century, research showed side effect risk on second hand tobacco smoke became public (American lung association, n.d.). The industry, fearing a decrease on sales, campaigned for tolerance and courtesy by the smokers and the non-smokers to avoid the smoke bans. Therefore, in the food and beverage industry, restaurants started to create smoking and non-smoking areas. In the early years of the 21st century, a more aggressive movement, started in the USA embodied by the “freedom to breathe” militants to restrict smoking in restaurants. As of 2006 the European countries started to write laws banishing the consumption of tobacco in public areas. The smoking bans created an environment where smoking became more and more difficult and provoked a shift in social life norms that pushed away the consumption in everyday life. On consequence of this was that it created a more healthy life behavior.…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Smoking Ban

    • 1357 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The smoking ban was introduced in Britain on July 1th 2007. When it came into effect it was prohibited to smoke cigarettes in most of public places and workplaces in England like bars, pubs, cafés and in busses and trains. This law has brought a big debate. In this assignment I will investigate the debate and create a discussion with a part of my own opinions.…

    • 1357 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    smoking bans

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Not everyone agrees businesses want to remove their smoking bans. After all they argue smoking can only harm the person who is smoking and all smokers have the right to smoke, whether at home or in public. Some conceder having smoking sections for smoker is always an option; just have them in different rooms in different parts of the establishment. If we banned smoking because it pollutes the air, then cars should be banned too because they pollute the air to. Either way, people are going to smoke, because it is a choice would be unconstitutional. If nonsmokers do not want smokers to be in the same public place as them, they should just go to…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bans on Smoking

    • 2108 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Since 1964, 2.5 million nonsmokers have died from exposure to secondhand smoke. Secondhand smoke is a mixture of gases and fine particles that include more than 7,000 chemicals, including hundreds that are toxic and about 70 that cause cancer. In children, secondhand smoke causes ear infections, asthma attacks, respiratory infections, and respiratory symptoms. In adults who have never smoked, secondhand smoke can cause cardiovascular disease and lung cancer. For nonsmokers breathing secondhand smoke has had harmful effects on the cardiovascular system that can increase the risk for heart attack. Nonsmokers who are exposed to secondhand smoke increase their lung cancer risk by 20-30%. Exposure to secondhand smoke happens in homes, workplaces, vehicles, bars, casinos, etc. Separating smokers from nonsmokers, cleaning the air, opening windows, and ventilating buildings does not eliminate secondhand smoke exposer. Although, some people argue banning smoking is an invasion of privacy, will put a damper on the economy, or claim that their rights being denied; eliminating smoking in indoor spaces is the only way to fully protect nonsmokers from second hand smoke exposer. I would like to discuss the history of smoking , why states are creating smoking bans, health risks for smokers and nonsmokers, benefits of quitting smoking , and why people are against smoking bans.…

    • 2108 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays