Autocratic Versus Democratic
Leadership Styles – Autocratic versus Democratic
Today’s business organization whether it is large or small is concerned with the financial bottom line. One of its most valuable assets is the human asset. Corporations spend large percentages of their budget on HR personnel and even greater percentages on their management staff. How and why they choose their managers is critical to the maintenance and sustainability of the business organization, its culture and its success. The examination and exploration into different management styles has been disjointed and inconsistent at best. The key to good management and leadership growth is a good knowledge foundation. There are various management styles. This paper will contrast and compare the autocratic and democratic advantages and disadvantages commonly related to each and what works in best depending on the business type and organizational structure.
Autocratic Management
What’s Autocratic Leadership? Autocratic leadership is a traditional leadership type with very distinct characteristics: 1. The Manager makes all the decision and selections of work.
2. The Manager seeks to have the most authority and control in decision making.
3. The Manager retains responsibility rather than make the most of delegation.
4. The Manager minimizes involvement with other managers in order make independent decision.
5. The Manager is not vested in their leadership growth, and prefers to work on the easy assignment at hand.
Autocratic leadership is seen as an old fashioned management method. As long as managers have commanded subordinates, it has existed and it is still employed by many organizational leaders worldwide. The rationalization autocratic leadership still survives, or even if it’s outdated, is because it’s discerning, carries immediate benefits, and comes untainted to many leaders. Many managers who pursue leadership development are frequently trying to enhance upon the autocratic leadership style.
The
Today’s business organization whether it is large or small is concerned with the financial bottom line. One of its most valuable assets is the human asset. Corporations spend large percentages of their budget on HR personnel and even greater percentages on their management staff. How and why they choose their managers is critical to the maintenance and sustainability of the business organization, its culture and its success. The examination and exploration into different management styles has been disjointed and inconsistent at best. The key to good management and leadership growth is a good knowledge foundation. There are various management styles. This paper will contrast and compare the autocratic and democratic advantages and disadvantages commonly related to each and what works in best depending on the business type and organizational structure.
Autocratic Management
What’s Autocratic Leadership? Autocratic leadership is a traditional leadership type with very distinct characteristics: 1. The Manager makes all the decision and selections of work.
2. The Manager seeks to have the most authority and control in decision making.
3. The Manager retains responsibility rather than make the most of delegation.
4. The Manager minimizes involvement with other managers in order make independent decision.
5. The Manager is not vested in their leadership growth, and prefers to work on the easy assignment at hand.
Autocratic leadership is seen as an old fashioned management method. As long as managers have commanded subordinates, it has existed and it is still employed by many organizational leaders worldwide. The rationalization autocratic leadership still survives, or even if it’s outdated, is because it’s discerning, carries immediate benefits, and comes untainted to many leaders. Many managers who pursue leadership development are frequently trying to enhance upon the autocratic leadership style.
The