Preview

Autocratic Leadership

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1003 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Autocratic Leadership
Unit 1
Autocratic leadership

What is autocratic leadership - Autocratic leaders make decisions without consulting their team members, even if their input would be useful. This can be appropriate when you need to make decisions quickly, when there's no need for team input, and when team agreement isn't necessary for a successful outcome. In this style of leadership, a leader has complete command and hold over their employees/team. The team cannot put forward their views even if they are best for the teams or organizational interests. They cannot criticize or question the leader’s way of getting things done. The leader himself gets the things done. The advantage of this style is that it leads to speedy decision-making and greater productivity under leader’s supervision. Drawbacks of this leadership style are that it leads to greater employee absenteeism and turnover. This leadership style works only when the leader is the best in performing in the job, unskilled and routine in nature or where the project is short-term and risky.

A good example of this is Hitler he showed autocratic leadership by not taking into account other people’s wishes or opinions because he made himself into power by creating his own army and taking command over Germany. By doing this he was in power and was able to tell people what to do when he wanted it done if any order was disobeyed you would be shot by his personal police the s.s. he used propaganda and force, he locked dissenters into camps like Auschwitz and he used radio and posters to make Germans think he is the only one who can lead them out of misery. He had duplication of various offices in his government. Those offices would work on similar projects but he would choose which project would go forward while limiting the information to the various group. Thus everything went through him and information was not shared. He was a very self-centred man because he wouldn’t take any one else view on things and this lead to even his

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    2. Autocratic leader benefits those employees who require close supervision. Creative employees who thrive in group functions detest this leadership style.…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    | Is a leadership style characterized by individual control over all decisions and little input from group members. Autocratic leaders typically make choices based on their own ideas and judgments and rarely accept advice from followers. Autocratic leadership involves absolute, authoritarian control over a group.…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Autocratic Leadership

    • 2326 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Thus, leaders feel that the best way to conduct their job is to practice different style whichever suits the best to the situation. thus a leader may use transactional leadership style, autocratic leadership style, laissez faire leadership style, participative leadership style, transformational leadership style etc. while practicing the style of autocratic leadership style, the leader would make all the decisions by himself, build strict guidelines which is to be followed by all the employees, having centralized power and authority etc. the leader using bureaucratic leadership style would have strict guidelines for everything while and would want all the activities to go as per the guidelines and may be lacking in flexibility and creativity in operations. A leader practicing charismatic style of leadership or transformational leadership style would be constantly offering inspiration and enthusiasm to its employees and gain high level of commitment from the employees towards the jobs and roles of the organization. A leader using participative style of leadership would be continuously engaging employees to discuss and participate in decision making in taking actions for long term and short term while using their suggestions to form the policies and in building the strategies of the future. A leader who…

    • 2326 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    After investigating the background of leadership, and looking into various leadership models, I can see there is no single style which will make someone an effective leader/manager. I have learnt that the most effective leaders are those who have the ability to understand which style is required and interchange between the various leadership styles so they apply the style to suit the current task and staff member. I believe that successful leaders need to be self-aware of how their actions can impact others.…

    • 3134 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Public Services

    • 2846 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Saddam Hussein is a very good example of an autocratic leader as people never questioned and did exactly what he said.…

    • 2846 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Authoritarian Leadership is one that takes personal charge of decision-making, and demands that group members obey orders (Macionis, 2013. P110). Bill Gates is a great example of authoritarian leadership. Bill had a vision after he took lead of the company and he used all possible resources within his reach and made a dream reality. Bill Gates did not consult others on which way his company should take.…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Autocratic leaders also known as strict authoritarian leader do not consult with the workforce and take all responsibilities themselves, they wield a great deal of power and control over their team members . This style is used in situations were very tight deadlines and budgets have to be met and decisions have to be made quickly. Team members would be of the type X…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The level to which a leader wishes or needs to maintain control may well influence a leader’s style. A leader may prefer to micromanage as it suits their style however, if that style does not suit the situation, it may negatively impact the team and their motivation. However, it may be that the situation requires the leader to maintain a high level of control, for example in a crisis situation where the stakes are high and decisions need to be made rapidly. In general, collective and more collaborative decision making takes longer than autocratic decision making.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rte1

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The leadership style I use is a mixture of autocratic and democratic and is situational dependent. I feel it is an effective style due to the very nature of my work. If something has to be done quickly and without thought on my subordinates’ part, I tend to be very autocratic so they are able to focus on what actually needs to be done and not get caught up in trying to decide what the best course of action is. On the contrary, if there is time for decisions to be made, and, especially if the decision is one that will affect more than myself, I try and get input from everyone to get their thoughts. I think this is the best way to get people to buy-in to a process and take a bit of ownership with it.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Studies

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages

    An autocratic leader is a person who has full control over a project and takes little advice from other team members. They often make decisions based on their own initiative and hardly accept anything others have to say. The leader also dictates how the team will be run and also the work methods and processes they should use. A benefit of having this kind of leader is that if a team is set a project that needs to be completed quickly then the leader will act on its own instinct causing the project to be completed quicker as there will not be time wasted on discussions. This type of leader is needed in teams that contain not many confident and enthusiastic people as they would be able to help them complete tasks. However there are some downsides to having a leader like this as they may come across as very bossy, controlling and rude which could all lead to conflict with the team members. Another downside is that because autocratic leaders make decisions by themselves, other team members may be left feeling useless which might cause more problems. An example of this style of leadership is a manager of a store…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Autocratic Leadership

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A manager with an autocratic style of leadership typically does all the decision-making without getting input from his/her subordinates (Rao, 2010, para. 3). Therefore, the manager is the authoritarian while all the subordinates are to simply follow instructions without giving their own thoughts or concerns about the task given to them. A benefit of this style is it can help provide structure and discipline to an otherwise inexperienced team, and also help a team stay on top of strict deadlines. Since the manager makes all the decisions, there is no time “wasted” on decision-making if there’s a time constraint. This type of leadership is also helpful when the manager has the highest amount of knowledge and could therefore specifically guide the subordinates on how to complete a task (Cherry), or when a type of…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the beginning when I took leadership I had to show my autocratic approach to the team to ensure I was enlisting the best methods possible to get appropriate results that would lead to KPI’s and SLA’s being met. As an autocratic leader I was able to make decisions to show the team I was capable of…

    • 802 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Autocracy is defined as a form of government in which supreme political power is held by one person. The term autocrat is derived from the Greek word autokratôr, auto meaning self, and kratia meaning rule. It implies self-rule, where one can do whatever they want if they have power. Totalitarianism is considered a modern form of an autocratic government, where the government controls all aspects of the society. A totalitarian political party seeks to control not only all economic and political matters but the attitudes, values, and beliefs of the people, eliminating the distinction between state and society. According to Carl Friedrich and Zbignew Brzezinksi there are six key elements of totalitarianism and without these elements totalitarianism cannot exist: 1) an official ideology, 2) a single party typically led by one man, 3) a terrorist police, 4) a communications monopoly, 5) a weapons monopoly, and lastly 6) a centrally directed economy. The ultimate goal of a totalitarian government is to establish a “perfect” society in the eyes of the political party. Three major historical totalitarian states include the Soviet Union under Stalin, Italy under Mussolini, and Nazi Germany under Hitler.…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Authoritarian

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Most simply, authoritarianism denotes the absence of free elections and the presence of unconstrained power. In this form of non-democratic government, the power and authority wielded by the leader(s) is not contingent upon popular support from the citizenry. Authoritarian leadership may be single or group headed. When a single person heads the government, it is known as an autocracy. When an elite group of individuals head the government, it is known as an oligarchy; such an elite ruling group is also sometimes known as a junta. Furthermore, individual leaders may vary substantially in how they govern. Those who are somewhat concerned with the betterment of the public good are known as benevolent autocrats. Those who are concerned solely with advancing their own interests are known as dictators. Those who exhibit great enthusiasm for violence and bloodshed are known as tyrants. No matter which style of leadership is expressed in an authoritarian state, the interests of the rulers will always be paramount to the welfare of the citizenry because the rulers are not accountable to the people.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Barack Hussein Obama was born in Honolulu, Hawaii on August 4, 1961. His father was from Kenya and his mother was from Kansas. He was raised with help from his grandfather and grandmother. His achievements were all based on hard work, determination and perseverance. In college, he was supported by his scholarship and student loans. He then went to law school and obtained the pose of the president of the Harvard Law Review and being the first ever African-American to obtain it. On November 4, 2008, he was elected as President of the United States of America. He is the first ever black American to get such a high pose in history. Barack Obama is currently the 44th president in the United States.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays