Summary:
Auguste Comte was very much influenced by science. During his time was the unfolding of the scientific revolution because of the many scientific discoveries. Positivism is the attitude which Auguste Comte pursue in his philosophy, which has something to do with science. Positivism claims that science has the answers to every question of any matters. Thus it argues that what science does has no answer does not exist. And thus it disapproves the existence of the Christian God because He has no account in the field of science.
Auguste Comte speaks of “the law three stages.” The first is the theological stage. In the history, humanity began to have the concept of God as transcendental. He is believed to be divine, who is above mankind and is responsible for every occurrence of events. The second is the metaphysical stage, wherein the concept of God as divine is replaced into an objective God. Then the third, the positivistic or scientific stage. As humanity continues to flourish in the course of time, science is founded which has all the account to the material objects, so then the previous concepts about God has been abandoned. God has no explanation in the field of science. Thus, positivism disregards the belief of God as theological and metaphysical. But still, there can be God according to the positivists. A God which is not theological and metaphysical, and that is Humanity. For humanity is accountable in science, positivists claims it their God than that of the God who is has no scientific basis. Thus humanity replaces the theological and metaphysical God. Because of this, Auguste Comte made a religion, the religion of humanity, wherein instead of God, humanity is the Supreme Being.
Reflection:
The Presumption of Humanity There has been a very big advancement in science. The whole world today is dominated of the technologies of science. This is very evident every new technologies introduced to us. Science continues to mould the world providing men all knowledge about everything in the world. It seems that in science, everything could be related. In this era, the world as we see according to the present situation is governed by science. If somebody asks a question, science has the answer. It serves as the means for everything. We cannot remove science in our way of living. Majority of the things we need and make use of is provided by science. In this sense, we human beings are dependent on the powers of science. As far as today, science is the most magnificent achievement of humanity. Science causes humanity to be proud of themselves, for they have done a great job in engendering science in the history of the world. Thus humanity is worthy of all praise because of science. Many people recognizes themselves as the sources of the greatest things in the world. And that is because of the wonderful things which a human being could do. We human beings truly are above all the other creatures in this world. But this belief come about if we do not recognize our limitations. Our idea of God occurs by the time we recognize that we human beings are limited for by the time we do it, we believe of something higher than us, and that is God. Thus, to recognize that we are the Supreme Being is only a presumption, for by doing it so, we deny that we are limited beings.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Science is normally linked with advancement, making life easier, providing ways to eliminate problems and more discoveries, possibilities of science are neverending…
- 383 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
1. Positivism- a philosophy of human intellectual development that culminated in science. In The Positive Philosophy Comte argued that human thought had developed in three stages: Theological, metaphysical, and positive.…
- 653 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
During the time period of 1550-1700, The Scientific Revolution brought about many changes in religion as compared to the preceding Renaissance movement. For example, religious realizations of the Italian Renaissance revolved around the idea of Humanism. Although the Catholic Church and strong a belief in the afterlife still dominated religious thought, focus began to shift to life on Earth and celebrating human achievement in the scholarly, artistic and political realms. Thus, there was a movement away from the constant goal of the fulfillment of the afterlife and towards the fulfillment of everyday individualistic needs. In contrast, with the Scientific Revolution came Deism - the belief in a powerful god who…
- 665 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
* A philosophy of human intellectual development that culminated in science which was describes by Auguste Comte in The Positive…
- 4538 Words
- 19 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In the discussion concerning the nature of religion in philosophy, the most prominent names include John Hick, Michael Goulder, John Herman Randall, Karen Armstrong, and Paul Tillich. Two primary vantage points exist in this discussion: the theistic view, in which the individual believes in an ultimate, transcendent being called “God,” and the non-theistic view, in which the individual sees “God” as a hypothesis rather than another Holy Being. To draw focus toward three particular names-- John Herman Randall, Karen Armstrong, and Paul Tillich-- is to draw specific attention to a compelling perspective regarding religion. To begin, John Herman Randall champions a point about religious symbols: “All ideas of God… are religious symbols… Such…
- 1241 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
One of the most fascinating arguments for the existence of an all-perfect God is the ontological argument. While there are several different versions of the argument, all purport to show that it is self-contradictory to deny that there exists a greatest possible being. Thus, on this general line of argument, it is a necessary truth that such a being exists; and this being is the God of traditional Western theism. This article explains and evaluates classic and contemporary versions of the ontological argument.…
- 172 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
In Descartes’s Meditations III, the Meditator describes his idea of God as "a substance that is infinite, eternal, immutable, independent, supremely intelligent, supremely powerful, and which created both myself and everything else."(70) Thus, due to his opinion in regards to the idea of God, the Meditator views God containing a far more objective reality than a formal one. Due to the idea that of God being unable to have originated in himself, he ultimately decides that God must be the cause of the idea, therefore he exists. The meditator defines God as such, “by ‘God’ I mean the very being the idea of whom is within me, that is, the possessor of all the perfections which I cannot grasp, but can somehow reach in my thought, which subject no defects whatsoever.” (70)…
- 836 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Some people may find it difficult to prove the rationality of God’s existence, so they may propose alternate conceptions: pantheism and panentheism. Both conceptions continue to assume that there must be a presence of a supernatural being—one that is beyond nature. Therefore, these theistic alternatives are irrational due to their lack of evidence.…
- 727 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Both the idea of God and the existence of God play a major role in the writings of Descartes and Pascal. Both certainly appear to believe in him though they argue the case for his existence very differently and they also give Him a very different sort of role in their works. Whilst Descartes claims that he is certain of the existence of God, using a large part of his Discours de la méthode pour bien conduire la raison, et chercher la verité dans les sciences to prove the supreme being’s existence, Pascal’s approach to philosophy cannot allow anything to be certain. He instead asserts that he knows God and that, through the use of his famous Wager, it is better for anyone to believe. The contrasting views of the two early-modern philosophers highlight the contrast between religious certainty and faith and also the key differences between metaphysical reasoning, a key element of Cartesianism, and Pascal’s more Aristotelian approach to philosophy.…
- 1780 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The previous ideal of God being the controller of all natural occurrences did not reconcile with the newly discovered natural laws. Deism did not gain popularity suddenly, but rather through years of accumulated subtle changes in theological beliefs as a result of various empirical developments. Faith-based religious ideals that contradicted scientific discoveries were eventually abandoned, as they could not be explained by the empiricism of science. This resulted in the denial of God’s role in everyday affairs. Gradually, religious rituals that praised God’s involvement in daily events were abolished.…
- 1163 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
When Descartes decided to tear down his beliefs and start fresh, he needed a foundation upon which to build his ideology. When judging what reality is, God must be considered. He/she must be taken out of a religious concept and proven to exist, exist in a way in which we cannot be deceived into only thinking is real. The proof of the existence of God in this way forms the backbone of Descartes’ further forays into proving what is reality.…
- 1354 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
The question of God is a perennial subject of debate in the history of philosophical scholarship and can be located in nearly all the epochs of philosophy. The subject however occupies a central space in the medieval epoch that was characterized by religious thinkers. The debate is largely between two schools of thought. There are those who opine that there is no such entity as God. To such thinkers, the question of God does not amount to anything but is largely a product of human imagination. On the other hand, there are certain group of thinkers who insist that God is a reality that exist and must be given due consideration. Thus, the onus lies on the one who affirms the existence of God to explain who or what this God is and to prove his existence.…
- 2680 Words
- 11 Pages
Best Essays -
When considering an argument for God, the ontological argument is one of the most intriguing. Mainly because of it's a priori nature, differing from other popular theological arguments which are a posteriori such as the cosmological argument. This means the ontological argument is understood to be true analytically on its own terms without an appeal to experience. Because it does not depend on empirical findings, it - if it is valid - is absolutely certain. Furthermore, the argument intends to prove a supreme being, one which is good and omniscient, and not merely a vague “first cause.” In this essay i shall explain the argument formulated by Anselm, as well as the advancement put forth by Descartes.…
- 1849 Words
- 8 Pages
Good Essays -
literature, and science. During this time Rene’ Descartes a French scholar advocated for human reason. He believed that the human rational was proficient enough to ascertain and clarify the the laws of nature and man. Descartes’ “I think therefore I am,” characterizes the start of the Enlightenment. God’s Ward was no longer the truth by which mankind responded to the issues of life, it was replaced by the autonomous understanding of each individual [ (What are the dangers of postmodernism?, 2013)…
- 1100 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Descartes’ Third Meditation focuses on the existence of God. He describes God as ‘a certain substance that is infinite, independent, supremely intelligent and supremely powerful, and that created me along with everything else that exists – if anything else exists’ (Descartes, 25). In this Meditation, he states a fundamental principle that ‘there must be as much [reality] in the cause as there is in its effect’. This is the question of the existence of infinity when he has just proven only his own finite existence, which is to have the ability to prove that such a being can exist. A quick review is also done of Meditation One where the existence of God must be taken out of the corporeal world, and of Two where Descartes only knows that he himself exists and doubts the existence of everything else. Then we can continue to analyze Descartes argument of an infinite being. This review will only breeze by the Meditations only to focus on the existence of God.…
- 1042 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays