International Bulletin of Business Administration
ISSN: 1451-243X Issue 10 (2011)
EuroJournals, Inc. 2011
Audit Report Lag and the Effectiveness of Audit Committee Among Malaysian Listed Companies
Ummi Junaidda Binti Hashim
Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin
Tel: 609-6653760; Fax: 609-6669220
Rashidah Binti Abdul Rahman
Accounting Research Institute, Universiti Teknologi Mara Shah Alam E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Tel: 603 55444745; Fax: 603 55444921
The purpose of this study is to examine the link between audit committee characteristics and audit report lag among 288 companies listed at Bursa Malaysia for a three year period from 2007 to 2009. The characteristics of audit committee examined are audit committee independence, audit committee diligence and audit committee expertise. In this study, audit report lag refers to the number of days from the company’?s year end (financial year) to the date of auditor’?s report. The results of this study show that audit report lag for the listed companies in Malaysia ranges from 36 days to 184 days for the three year period. The results of this study also show that audit committee independence and audit committee expertise could assist in reducing audit report lag among companies in Malaysia. This study however could not provide any evidence on the link between audit committee diligence on audit report lag. Overall, the findings in this study provide some evidence supporting the resource based theory, whereby characteristics of the audit committee as the resources and capabilities could improve companies’? performance as well as corporate reporting.
Keywords: Audit Committee, Audit Report Lag
Financial reporting in general will provide useful information and assist users in decision making as capacity of capital providers in companies. Particularly users rely on the audited financial reports in their assessment and evaluation of companies’? performance. The audited financial reports will increase its reliability and users will feel affirm on the reports verified by the auditors and would be able to make decision wisely (FASB, Concepts Statement 2). Timeliness itself will enhance the usefulness of the information. There are many ways to define timeliness. Commonly known that timeliness is the reporting delay from the company’?s accounting year end to the date of the audit report completed (Chambers and Penman, 1984). Audit report lag would lead the shareholders and potential shareholders to postpone their transaction on shares (Ng and Tai, 1994). This in turn, would provide negative effect to the company.
Bursa Malaysia1 has demanded for timely financial reporting through the provision of Chapter 2 and Chapter 9 of the Listing Requirements (2009), Bursa Malaysia Securities Berhad. Bursa Malaysia listing requirement under chapter 9.23 (a) provides that a public listed companies must submit its annual report to Bursa Malaysia within six months after the company’?s year end. To prevent companies from late submission of their audited financial reports, Bursa Malaysia in consultation with Securities Commission has imposed penalty to public listed companies for failure to disclose the material facts such as the annual report within the time frame. However, despite the penalty being imposed, there are companies that could not meet the submission deadline. This current scenario as reported in Bursa Malaysia website 2010...
References:  Abdul Rahman, R. and Mohamed Ali F.H., 2006. “?Board, audit committee, culture and
earnings management: Malaysian evidence”?
 Abtott, L. J., Parker, S., Peter, G. F and Raghunandan, K., 2003. “?The association between
audit committee characteristics and audit fees”?
 Abbott, L.J. and S. Parker., 2000. “?Auditor selection and audit committee characteristics”?.
Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory
 Afify, H.A.E., 2009. Determinants of audit report lag: Does implementing corporate
governance have any impact? Empirical evidence form Egypt
 Ahmad, R.A.R. and Kamarudin, K.A., 2003. “?Audit delay and the timeliness of corporate
reporting: Malaysian evidence”?
 Ali Shah, S.Z., Ali Butt S. and Hasan, A., 2009. “?Corporate governance and earnings
management an empirical evidence form Pakistani listed companies”?
 Ashton, R.H., Willingham, J.J. and Elliott, R.K., 1987. “?An empirical analysis of audit delay”?.
 Atiase, R.K., Bamber, L.S. and Tse, S., 1988. “?Timeliness of financial reporting, the firm size
effect, and stock price reactions to annual earning announcements”?
 Bedard, J., Chtourou, S.M. and Courteau, L. 2004. “?The effect of audit committee expertise,
independence, and activity on aggressive earnings management”?
 Carcello, J.V. and Neal, T.L. 2000. “?Audit Committee Composition and Auditor Reporting”?.
 FASB, 1979. Proposed statement of financial accounting concepts, qualitative characteristics:
criteria for selecting and evaluating financial accounting and reporting policies, Stamford, CT.
 Fraser, D.R., Zhang, H., and Derashid, C., 2005. “?Capital structure and political patronage: The
case of Malaysia”?
 Gujarati, D.N., 2003.”? Basic Econometrics, (4th Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
 He, L., Labelle, R., Piot, C. and Thornton, D.B., 2009. “?Board monitoring, audit committee
effectiveness, and financial reporting quality: Review and synthesis of empirical
 Hsu H-H., and Wu, Y-H., 2010. “?Board composition, ‘?grey directors’? and the incidences of
corporate failure in the UK”?
 Ismail, H., Mohd. Iskandar, T., and Mohid Rahmat, M. (2008. “?Corporate reporting quality,
audit committee and quality of audit”?
 Jaggi, B. and Tsui, J., 1999. “?Determinants of audit report lag: further evidence from Hong
 Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling., 1976. “?Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency
Costs and Ownership Structure”?
 Klein, A. 2002. “?Economic determinants of audit committee independence”?. Accounting
Review, 77(2), 435-52.
 Leventis, S., and Caramanis, C., 2005. “?Determinants of audit time as a proxy of audit quality”?.
 McGee, R. W., 2007. “?Corporate governance and timeliness of financial reporting: a case study
of Russian energy sector”?
 Menon, K., and Williams, J.D., 1994. “?The use of audit committees for monitoring”?. Journal of
Accounting and Public Policy, 13, 121-139
 Mohd Ghazali, N. A., 2010. “?Ownership structure, corporate governance and corporate
performance in Malaysia”?
Greece”?, European Accounting Review, 15, 273-287.
 Razman, S.R., and Iskandar M.T., 2004
 Tauringana, V., Kyeyune, M. F and Opio P. J., 2008.”? Corporate governance, dual language
reporting and the timeliness of annual reports on the Nairobi Stock Exchange”?
Please join StudyMode to read the full document