Preview

Attribution Interpersonal Perception

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1614 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Attribution Interpersonal Perception
Attribution and Interpersonal Perception

It is said that we often attribute our own and others ' behaviour to personal dispositions when the behaviour was in fact caused by the situation. Why and when is this so? Refer to the function of attributions; attribution errors; interpersonal perceptions and interactions. You may use personal examples to illustrate these biases.

1 Background 2
2 Introduction 2
3 Attributional Theories 2
3.1 Correspondent Inference 3
3.2 Causal Attributions 3
3.3 Behaviour as a function of Disposition or Situation 4
3.4 Augmenting and Discounting 5
4 Attributional Sources of error: 5
4.1 Correspondence Bias: Overestimating the Role of Dispositional causes. 6
4.1.1 Wanting Dispositions 7
4.1.2 Misunderstanding
…show more content…
Because we cannot "see" their covert feelings, reasons and intentions, we have to infer them from what we can "see"-- their overt behaviour. We make our attributions about ourselves in much the same way. Often our own emotions, attitudes, traits, and abilities are unclear and ambiguous to us. (Why did I overreact?) In self-perception, as in our perception of others, we search for plausible causes of our behaviour. If we are aware of strong external factors pushing us, we are likely to make situational attributions. But when there are no clear external forces we are likely to make dispositional attributions. This distinction between situational and dispositional causes of behaviour is fundamental to all attribution theories. Many discussions of casual attribution seem to suggest that attribution is a highly rational, logical and objective process. This is not always the case -- often our attributions are subject to biases that lead us to incorrect conclusions regarding the reasons behind others ' (and our own) behaviour. Attributions cannot tell us why a person behaved in a certain way. That is not their function. Rather their function is to describe the psychological operations that underlie such attributions. The prescribed literature for this assignment contributes to an understanding of these psychological operations.

2 Introduction
Attribution is defined as the process through which we
…show more content…
In other words, an observer should not assume D to be positive or negative when S and B are equal. Called the discounting principle, this principle suggests that when we try and estimate a person’s dispositions, the person’s behaviour should be “discounted” or ignored when it is precisely the behaviour required by the situation. Such behaviour is said to be non-diagnostic and tells us nothing about the person’s tendencies to behave (Gilbert

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Biases assigned to a person without intention, awareness, effort, or control, often based on subliminal cues…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Attribution Theory

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As discussed earlier in the text, motivation is the desire that an individual develops to fuel a drive for success. Individuals may find motivation in the form of external rewards (extrinsic motivation), or simply through internal gratification (intrinsic motivation), knowing that they are exhibiting a great deal of effort in a given activity. When an athlete experiences success or failure they are likely to attribute those successes or failures to different circumstances. This process of attributing causes for successes and failures is a process known as attribution theory, and can be defined as “a cognitive approach to motivation in which perceived causation plays an important role in explaining…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Attribution theory describes how causes are attributed to past events. This may be dispositional (attributed to a person) or situational. In a single instance of an outcome, correspondent inference theory suggests diagnosis is based on choice, expectations and intent. Expected, freely chosen behaviour is considered to be dispositional, whereas unexpected, forced behaviour is attributed to situation. Attributing intent is simplest when considering behaviour with only one positive effect. When an outcome occurs numerous times, covariation theory describes possible cause attribution. This involves looking at cases where the suspected cause is present/absent and matching them to instances where the outcome is present/absent, utilising information on consensus (how others behave), distinctiveness (how the individual behaves in different circumstances) and consistency (how the individual has behaved in similar circumstances). Consistency should be high to make a good attribution judgement. When consensus and distinctiveness are also high, the attribution is likely to be situational whereas if consensus and distinctiveness are low, a dispositional attribution is likely.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Attribution theory is concerned with how individuals interpret events and how this relates to their thinking and behaviour. Heider (1958) was the first to propose a psychological theory of attribution, but Weiner and colleagues (e.g., Jones et al, 1972; Weiner, 1974, 1986) developed a theoretical framework that has become a major research paradigm of social psychology…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Attribution in social behavior is the process of inferring the causes of events or behaviors. For example, in real life, attribution is something we all do every day, usually without any awareness of the underlying processes and biases that lead to…

    • 548 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fundamental attribution error is when a person overestimates the influence of another person’s personality over a remark or behavior rather than giving credit to the influence the situation may have on the person. A famous experiment demonstrating this “error” was conducted by David Napolitan and George Goethals. In this experiment, they instructed a woman to act either rude and critical, or warm and friendly to each person individually. Half of the group was told that the woman would be acting spontaneously, and the other half was let in on the experiment. The result was that the assumptions about her personality did not change even though half the group had known that she was an actor. Each group assumed that because the woman behaved coldly, her personality was so. Even the group who was told that her behavior was situational had still believed that she was warm and friendly because of the way she was acting in the situation.…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The key concepts behind the idea of attribution theories is to question what was the cause why you chose it and what information led you there. [1]Heider in his description tells us that we make judgements based on either internal/disposition causes, which are responsible for the motivating behaviour located in the persons personality or his apparent mood or on external situational causes which are caused by the environment. External attribution tells how the person acts in a situation outside the persons control whereas internal attribution is telling us something about the person and is able to give predictions about any possible actions that person might take. [2] Harold Kelley’s theory uses a detailed model called the ‘corvariation model’ using information from previous behaviour to make sense of current behaviours, considering how behaviours and situations vary together or correlate. [3]Kelley portrays this as that of ‘intuitive scientists’ echoing Heiders idea of ‘naive psychology’ but being more developed in that he specifies the procedures and data that he would use. [4]Harold Kelley’s theory looks at information from three different variables. These variables include consistency, distinctiveness and consensus. All three variables can be summed up in their simplified counterparts; actor, action and situation. [5]The major benefit of Kelly’s theory is that it offers precise prediction and data that is testable, and able to be proven. [6]Experiments such as those based on behavioural events generally use vignette’s to test social and psychological theories. A vignette is a short description of an event, situation or behaviour. [7] McArthur tested Kelly’s covariation model of attribution using vignettes containing sixteen different behavioural situations. [8]These…

    • 2153 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fundamental attribution error is the tendency for observers to underestimate situational influences and overestimate dispositional influences upon other's behavior. (Myers, 2008) In simple terms, when a person's behavior is unbecoming, we tend to automatically jump to a conclusion that the person has a bad behavior, they're rude, etc. Very seldom do we look at the situation that the person may be in, whether it's…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Really intelligent and capable people are often hard to get along with others as they have their own independent ideas and opinions about everything. They feel they are right always. Others may think of him rude.…

    • 923 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When a member of one culture sends a message to a member of another culture, ______________ takes place.…

    • 3213 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Attribution, defined as assigning a quality or character to a person or an object, in the context of Psychology, refers to the classification of factors that affect behaviour. Behaviour is attributed to either or both dispositional factors and situational factors. Dispositional factors refer to the internal causes of an individual’s behaviour, whilst situational factors deal with the external causes of behaviour which can include the social setting and environment. Two common errors of attribution are the Fundamental attribution error (FAE) and Self-serving bias (SSB).…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Attribution Theory is associated with three major factors that define it. Distinctiveness, it means whether an individual displays different behaviors in different situations. Consensus, it occurs if everyone who is in a similar situation responds in a same way, and the last one, which is consistency in a person’s actions. The more consistent the behavior of one person, the more the observer is inclined to attribute it to internal causes.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Consensus takes into account how likely all those facing a similar situation are to respond in the same way. If all the people using the same technology as Jake perform poorly, we tend to assign his performance problem to an…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * Power difference: individual perception on someone that impacts your life (professor, friend, romantic partners, etc.) someone that has power in your relationship…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Attribution -determine the causes behind others’ behavior Correspondent Inferences - judging people’s dispositions, traits, and characteristics from their behavior Challenges in judging others accurately - many possible causes of behavior - people sometimes disguise their true characteristics Making accurate inferences about others - focus on behavior in situations with low demand for social acceptability - focus on behavior for which there is only one logical explanation…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics