Attractiveness- Appraised in Only One Glance?
There are several factors that influence us in our judgment of who we find attractive. Regarding the physical attractiveness, men and women both pay most attention to the face. Above that, men also take into account a woman´s waist-to-hip-ratio. Interestingly, researchers have found that for men, physical attractiveness has a greater impact on their partner choice than for women. Females are putting more emphasis on other factors such as reliability and socio-economic status. Yet, both genders benefit equally from one phenomenon: Attractive people receive more favorable treatment in hiring and promotion and are rated as smarter, more extroverted and as more socially skilled. Besides these aspects of physical attractiveness that influence us in our behavior towards other people , there are reasons beyond which need to be considered in order to comprehend decision making in partner choice and attractiveness judgment. Three aspects of interpersonal attractiveness will be discussed in this research paper. Propinquity, similarity, and reciprocal liking are part of the field of interpersonal attractiveness, which is thematically integrated in social psychology. According to these three interpersonal effects, we tend to prefer a mate who lives in a close distance, with whom we are sharing the most important opinions and traits and who we know to like us.
1.1 Attractiveness of faces
1.2 The waist-to-hip ratio
1.3 Manipulation of attractiveness
1.5 A newborn´s reaction to physical attractiveness
2.1 The person next door: Propinquity Effect……………………………………………13 2.2 Similarity Effect
2.3 Reciprocal Liking
4. Bibliographical References
1. Physical Attractiveness
There have been numerous moments in which we have fallen victim to someone´s appealing physical attractiveness. It often happens without awareness. It is a continuous, subconscious part of our daily judgments. We cannot turn it off and we cannot deny that there are faces we like more and faces we like less. Some faces we find appealing, some faces we feel we need to ignore; even a new born reacts differently on certain facial traits. This leads us to the question of why and how we manipulate with make-up and clothing. Does make-up really help us in deceiving other people´s minds?
1.1 Attractiveness of faces
As dictated, attractiveness lies in the eye of the beholder. Can we blindly believe this well known saying, or are there facial structures that people from all over the world and in all cultures perceive as pretty? Many studies show: Beauty is not just dependant on personal, individual preferences. Instead of being a matter of taste, researchers say it is a matter of genetics. According to them, a cultural predominating basis for Beauty-Perception is existent (Müller & Schuster, 2002). We tend to believe a true beauty stands out against the crowd. Yet, Immanuel Kant already knew that simplicity is the key to true beauty: “The average seems to be the basic measurement and foundation of all beauty itself” (Müller & Schuster, 2002, S.207). Sir Francis Galton was the first researcher to explore Kant´s thesis by generating composite-pictures. First, Galton took individual photographs of different people and then integrated them into one single photograph. What he received was perfection; an ideal face that would not exist in real life. Galton presented this ideal photograph together with some real, individual photographs to some test persons who had been instructed to say which they found more attractive. The research showed that the majority thought the ideal face was prettier. Recently this experiment was repeated, only with new methods. Researchers prepared the generated ideal photograph on the computer and again most...
References: Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D. & Akert, R. M. (2005). Social Psychology (5th ed.). New Jer sey: Pearson.
Ebner, T., Gathmann, S. & Wiedermann, A. (2002). Schönheit und der Haloeffekt. In A. Hergovich (publ.). Psychologie der Schönheit (pp. 186-202). Wien: Facultas.
Grammer, K. (1993). Die Evolution der Liebe. Hamburg: Hoffman & Campe.
Langlois, J. H. & Roggman, L. A. (1990). Attractive faces are only average. Psycholo gical Science, (1st ed., pp. 115-121).
Müller, I. & Schuster, S. (2002). Was zeichnet ein schönes Gesicht aus? In A. In Her govich, (publ.). Psychologie der Schönheit (pp. 205-213). Wien: Facultas.
Myers, D. G. (2004). Psychologie. Heidelberg: Springer-Medizin.
Pils, A., Stocker, G. & Wrba, P. (2002). Die Bedeutung des Hüften-Taillenverhältnis für die Beurteilung der Attraktivität. In A. Hergovich, (publ.). Psychologie der Schönheit (pp. 255-271). Wien: Facultas.
Pökl, M. & Schafler, H. (2002). Ist ein schönes Gesicht Indikator für Gesundheit und Fruchtbarkeit? In A. Hergovich, (publ.). Psychologie der Schönheit (pp. 229- 251). Wien: Facultas.
Singh, D. (1993). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness. Role of Waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, (65th ed., pp. 293-307).
Singh, D. (1995). Female Judgement of Male Attractiveness and Desirability for Rela tionship: Role of Waist-to-Hip ratio and Financial Status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, (69th ed., pp. 1089-110).
Sinzinger, A. (2002). Die Reaktion von Kindern auf physische Attraktivität. In A. Hergo vich, (publ.). Psychologie der Schönheit (pp. 177-185). Wien: Facultas.
Sponsel, R. (26.05.2005). Attraktiv und Attraktivität. Psychologie, Sozialpsychologie, Psychopathologie, Soziologie. aus allgemeiner und integrativer Sicht. Available at: http://www.sgipt.org/gipt/sozpsy/attrak0.htm [08/26/2009].
Waschina, T. (2002). Lässt sich die physische Attraktivität verändern? In A. Hergovich, (publ.). Psychologie der Schönheit . pp. 115 - 128. Wien: Facultas.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document