Han China (206 B.C.E. – 220 C.E.) and Imperial Rome (31 B.C.E. – 476 C.E.) have some similarities and differences such as in foundation, governmental control, and collapse. These factors either helped their empire or weakened them influencing their fall.…
The Hans and the Romans both had very fascinating views on their technology. While The Han’s attitude toward technology was viewed as a positive contribution to their society the Romans had positive views other Romans had negative attitudes. Every document has its own opinions on the way they appreciate technology some support which is making then look good, while some think it’s for low class people and not for government. In order to fully analyze Han and Roman attitudes toward technology it would have been helpful to have an additional document of an interview with a Roman laborer because all of the other documents were from higher class Romans who did not work with tools and such technology.…
The Classical Romans and Hans both had fascinating views on technology. Because they were both such great empires, they managed to create a wide variety of technology. When the scholars were inventing it, they were focused on creating life much easier than it was. Technology was made important in more than one way, and attitudes toward it varied from person to person. And even though these attitudes varied, the technology was still improved to become the basis of what we have today. The Han and Romans’ attitudes toward technology were aimed at improving their tools since most of the Han technology is about agriculture and ways to decrease the workload, while the Romans sought to create an easier way of transporting goods throughout the empire, while maintaining a mathematical system to regulate it.…
During the classical period, many civilizations and large land bases were formed. Of these many civilizations, two main ones were Han China and Imperial Rome. Although Han China and Imperial Rome both had similar government structures and trading systems, they both had two very different militaries.…
The Han and the Romans were ahead of the game when it came to technology. However, they both had very different attitudes towards the subject. The Han were determined to get ahead and they were supportive of others who made advances within the empire, whereas the Romans, although determined to get ahead, were arrogant and judgmental of each other’s work.…
In Source C, archaeologists from The University of Cincinnati are using technology at Pompeii. The archaeologists are using a tablet/ipad to either record their findings or assist them with their excavation. Which area both positive aspects of technology. As it enables the archaeologist to discover or record findings during excavation, making their process much easier. The use of technology can also assist the archaeologist as it can help determine locations and identify materials and items that are found.…
From the around second century B.C.E. to the third century C.E. the Han and Roman attitudes toward technology were different in how they took pride in some of their inventions with the Han accepting the role of the craftsmen and their technology they created showed in documents 1-4. However, the Romans did not do as much of this and did not care as much about the technology and how it could be utilized. This was shown in documents 5-8. Both Han China and the Romans did show a similarity in how their technology, even though it was viewed differently, helped to develop their Empires. Throughout these eight documents, everyone one of these had male from the upper class writing the document. I think an additional document that could be useful in answering the question of what the Han and Roman attitudes toward technology were would be a person from the lower class. This document would be useful because that the upper class did not show interest about the technology that a commoner might have used such as hand tools and other common working items.…
The Han Empire had a very positive outlook on the advancement of technology such as irrigation systems while the Roman Empire seemed to have a lot of opposition regarding the advancement of technology. The Roman elites viewed technology as tools for the weak. Both Empires acknowledged the change in technology in some way or another.…
Everyday, since the beginning of humanity people have been comparing. Whether it be two people, or two objects, it is always a comparison between two things to see what one thing has and what the other does not have. An example of this could be two stores like a Dollar Store or a Staples. Both have items needed for school or work, but one just puts more effort into ensuring that their product is at its best for their customers, while the other simply wants to make a profit. This is similar to the technology and works of the Han and Roman Empire. Both had several advances to their technologies but both had differences in them and separate purposes in these technological advancements. Both empires had different attitudes about their technology but also thought of themselves the same way. They believed they were the best empire of their time and everyone around…
The Han Dynasty attitude towards technology is positive and negative feelings towards society even though Rome expressed the same feelings. These 8 documents can help prove and provide evidence for my thesis. In (doc 1) and (doc 4) explain how the Han Dynasty used water for positive things. In (doc 2) and (doc 3) explain the negative perceptions, which are how tools of the first century B.C.E were good enough to use but were neutrally valued, but overtime the quality of the item decreased.…
The Roman and the Han were by far the most technologically advanced civilizations of their time. The time period for both of the societies depicted whether or not the people were inclined to their advancements or not. Much evidence goes to show that both the Roman and Han societies attitudes towards technology in B.C.E. were more negative and in C.E. they leaned more positive. In the documents given, it is evident that during the B.C.E. both the Roman and Han’s attitude toward their technologies were negative. Little did they know how helpful they would turn out to be and how they would revolutionize the world forever. This is first apparent from an excerpt from a Han government official. He states that they need more water conservation offices that are staffed with people who are experienced to aid the local community with the floods (doc. 1). This exemplifies that the people were dissatisfied with the lack of officials to keep the community organized and free of danger. This negative theme is also seen in a passage written by a Han government official (Han Guan) who is complaining about the iron tools and how they were made better when they were made individually by the common people rather than mass-produced by the state. He also touches on the fact that salt and iron prices have sky rocketed so the common people could not afford to season their food and make tools for themselves…
Between the years of 500 B.C.E. to 500 C.E., many classical civilizations, especially China and Rome, were greatly dependent on technology. This was due to the immense amount of trade and infrastructure of Rome under Pax Romana, with the creation of aqueducts, bath houses, and roads, and China under the Han Dynasty with the Silk Roads, stretching all the way towards the Roman Empire, in the west. Trade provoked an increasing need and appreciation for technology, which resulted in certain attitudes toward technology. The attitudes of the Han and Roman government regarding technology was the utmost respect and appreciation, which could be seen by the treatment towards important sources of technology, such as water technology.…
Nowadays, usage of technology can be seen as a necessity to almost everyone in the modern society. It is deemed to be able to improve the quality of people’s lives, which defines as a person’s satisfaction or dissatisfaction with the cultural or intellectual conditions that the person lives in. Is the advancement of technology only beneficial and not bring any adverse effects to us?…
Technology has always flourished for the gain of mankind. The major achievements of technology have left man spell-bound and every part of the world today is enjoying the comforts provided by technology. Thanks to technology, all the countries are interlinked and we are now living in a global village. Modern technology has greatly improved people's lives through different fields such as medicine, work, education, industry as well as warfare. However, we cannot say that technology is all good in itself. It is a two-edged sword and we have to see to what extent it has really helped improved people's standard of living.…
For the supporters, technology is a good thing. Many of the discoveries made throught time were mainly because of the use of new inventions because technology keeps growing and growing. Also things like the internet also affects our lives. For instance, you have a friend who is miles away. Before you used to writes letters (some people still do), but nowadays you could just call them or talk to them of Facebook. Or you could get on a plane and go visit them. There are also more examples of ways of technology like: medicine, tools, transportation, etc.…