[ATHLETICS IN MACGREGOR’S SPORTING LANDSCAPE]
Health & Physical Education Sociology
* 1.0 Introduction
* 2.0 Figueroa’s Framework
> 2.1 Individual Level
- 3.0 Action Plan
* 4.1 Justification of Action plan
> 4.2 Links to Survey Results
> 4.3 Links to Research including individual level
- 5.0 Conclusion
- 6.0 Reference List
- 7.0 Appendices
As Macgregor’s athletics carnival lacks in the participation sector, with the research of Figueroa’s Framework mainly concentrating on the individual level has found that, with survey results shows that students feel that athletics is ‘uncool’ and would rather sit and chat with their friends. However, using tactics which corroborate teamwork and competitive factors which in theory will motivate students to strive and increase their participation levels.
This report will provide a detailed analysis of the participation of athletics in Macgregor’s microcosm as the societal norm believe that the status quo is “uncool”, it is known that the position of Australia’s sporting landscape is very weak as there is a lack of participation within Australia as a whole This can be answered by a simple formula created to find the reason why some sports have a lack in participation in mainstream society today, Figueroa’s framework, this formula is divided into Levels listed in the following Cultural, Structural, Institutional, interpersonal and individual levels, nonetheless, it Is concluded that it is up to the individual of whether they decide to participate in Athletics or not. 2.0 Figueroa’s Framework
The social factors that influence an individual’s decision to participate in Athletics may indirectly or directly impact them by shaping their values, attitudes and beliefs. Knowing this the individual may find themselves being subjective to the people and also the certain factors they face in society ranging from cultural differences to peers to themselves. Sociologist, Peter Figueroa, develop a framework that analyses the equity of social resources that can also be implemented into the participation of athletics. 2.1 Individual Level
It can be argued that when it comes to equity and access issues, the individual level is the most important. This is because, while all levels of Figueroa’s Framework can identify how equity and sporting opportunities are presented to an individual, in the end it is the individual’s choice that will determine his or her access and level of participation in physical education.(Kiss, 2012) This level is specific to Macgregor’s sporting landscape as it highlights the lack of participation in students; nonetheless, these decisions about sport and physical activity are ultimately made by the individuals Genes, values, attitudes and personalities which are specific to each individual.
3.0 Action plan
In Macgregor’s deteriorating athletics program, the lack of participation in the carnivals can link to many reasons why they don’t compete in such events. Study shows that the majority of students would prefer to sit and chat with their friends instead of competing in athletics, however, to allow students to participate, an action plan was developed to; in theory create a more fun and enjoyable carnival thus increasing participation levels, using successful methods utilized in Australian sports such as Cricket, NRL, AFL, etc. The ideologies used within these sports can be integrated within the society of Macgregor’s microcosm shaping the status quo of Macgregor’s Athletics program in a more positive, enjoyable way.
4.1 Justification of Action plan
Throughout sporting history there are various techniques to strive for in order to have a successful carnival, the majority of successful sports share many similar techniques to better improve the participation of athletes...
References: 2) Oxford University Press. (2010). SPORT AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY IN AUSTRALIAN SOCIETY. Available: http://www.oup.com.au/titles/no_class/9780195573862/08_RUS_QSPE_3pp.pdf. Last accessed 19th May 2013.
3) Olympics. (2000). Olympic Records. Available: http://olympics-records.com/olympics_records.htm . Last accessed 20th May 2013.
5) Kiss, et al (2010). Factors Affecting Access to Sport and Physical Activity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. P316-336.
6) ABS. (2013). SPORTS PARTICIPATION . Available: http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Products/4901.0~Apr+2012~Main+Features~Sports+participation?OpenDocument . Last accessed 21th May 2013.
7) TES. (1997). World of Sport. Available: http://www.topendsports.com/world/lists/popular-sport/countries/australia.htm . Last accessed 21th May 2013.
8) Tennis Australia. (2013). Tennis Australia. Available: http://www.tennis.com.au/ . Last accessed 21th May 2013.
9) Hughes, R., and Coakley, J. (1991). Positive deviance among athletes: The implications of over conformity to the sport ethic. Sociology of Sport Journal, 8(4), 307-325.
10) Hartmann, D. (2008). High School Sports Participation . Available: http://library.la84.org/3ce/HighSchoolSportsParticipation.pdf . Last accessed 21th May 2013.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document