Preview

Asymmetric Integration in the EU: Nuclear Energy Policy within European member states

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2392 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Asymmetric Integration in the EU: Nuclear Energy Policy within European member states
Roberto Maria Sciarra
Prof. Lars Rensmann
PL 315 Institutions and Policies of the European Union
November 2, 2013
Asymmetric Integration in the EU: Nuclear Energy Policy within European member states

The delegation of powers by member states for the process of integration has made the European Union unique in its kind. Although the main European theoretical schools might argue whether the EU is more supranational and intergovernmental, no one can argue that European states have made a serious commitment to create an “ever closer union”. Especially with the arrival of the single currency, it is clear that the level of cooperation among the European member states is nothing comparable either to any other International Governmental Organization (IGO) in the world or to any other federal state. Nowadays, the EU legislation affects several policy areas by trumping domestic law and by hampering the sovereign powers of its member states. However, compared to all the other policy fields that EU monitors, regulates, and enforces, the nuclear policy field has remained quite silent. Indeed, while all the other policy areas went through a functional integration process, the issue of nuclear energy remained clearly in the hands of states and rather went through a process of disintegration. Nonetheless, nuclear energy is far for not being important in the European scenario; a lot of states make nuclear energy one the main sources of power and the public sphere pays serious attention to it.
Therefore, this paper will try to address the nuclear energy integration process as a failure compared to the fact that member states really take into account the importance (and the dangers) of nuclear energy. The paper will basically focus on the main EU institution that deals with nuclear energy (EURATOM) and its failure. In addition, public opinion, alongside with the policies adopted in this field by the governments of the member states, will be taken into analysis to



Cited: Barry, Andrew, and William Walters. "From EURATOM to "Complex Systems": Technology and European Government." Alternatives 28 (2003): 305-29. JSTOR. Web. 03 Nov. 2013. Croft, Stuart. "European Integration, Nuclear Deterrence, and Franco-British Nuclear Cooperation." International Affairs 72.4 (1996): 771-87. JSTOR. Web. 03 Nov. 2013. Johnson, Debra. "Nuclear Energy Policy in the European Union: Meltdown or False Alarm?"Journal of International Affairs 53.1 (1999): 149-63. JSTOR. Web. 03 Nov. 2013. Schneider, Mycle. "France’s Great Energy Debate." Bullettin of the Atomic Scientists 69.1 (2013): 27-35. JSTOR. Web. 03 Nov. 2013.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Nuclear powers biggest threat is from the public’s perception of it. As seen in Germany as well as throughout Europe, if the public deems something too unsafe and does not want to live near it, the governments will have no choice but to shut down the plants and look for different sources of energy. Compared to biofuels and solar power, nuclear power is already extremely established and generates a large share of the worlds’ power, and faces most of its issues in the political realm instead of the practical…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lettow, Paul Vorbeck. 2010 Strengthening the nuclear nonproliferation regime. New York Council on forgein Relations. Print…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nucleat Power in Australia

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Currently, an increasing number of countries have developed nuclear power and adopted nuclear power as their main source of power. However, not all countries support the development of nuclear power. A great deal of residents concerns which have swept across much of the developed world was caused by the growing nuclear industry overseas (Falk ,Green & Mudd 2006).In Australia, nuclear power is not used due to the worries about safety and pollution, but some experts point out that the perception about nuclear power should change, because it is possible that the use of electricity in Australia will double during the period from 2040 to 2050 relative to what it is today (Switkowski 2007).Opinions on whether Australia should adopt nuclear power as main source of power are divided. The controversy has become more heated following the growing concerns that traditional energy is running out. A majority of individuals tend to insist that Australia should not develop nuclear power. However, this essay will discuss that Australia should adopt nuclear power for several reasons: the raw materials of nuclear power, uranium, is abundant in Australia, and to a large extent, nuclear power is more environmentally-friendly and it can bring a lot of economic benefits for Australia, furthermore, the safety concerns are being addressed more effectively over time.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many people think that nuclear power can provide low-cost energy which can easily substitute oil and the other common sources of energy. In addition to this, nuclear weapons are considered the only instrument which can make possible the maintenance of word peace. The nuclear problem is complex and difficult to analyze without any kind of prejudices. First of all, it is true that nuclear power can provide a huge amount of energy to every city in the world, but we also should consider…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mariotte, Michael. “Second Thoughts on Nuclear Power.” Futurist Nov. 2009: 23. Academic Search Complete. Web. 2 Dec. 2009. <http://search.ebscohost.com/‌login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=44523422&site=ehost-live>.…

    • 2071 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear power’s bad reputation has come about due to the accident at nuclear plants such as Chernobyl in Ukraine, Fukushima in Japan and Three Mile Island in the USA. Chernobyl was one of the only ones out of three that has been classified as a “major accident” by The International Atomic Energy Agency; the other was the accident at Fukushima. The reason the Chernobyl accident was considered a “major accident”, was due to the emergency shutdown failing, with a full melt down being achieved. This area is not able to be populated ever again due to the extreme…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many professors, scientists, researchers, and even governments, have been debating over the issue on the use of nuclear power as a main energy source. In Taking Sides, two authors who are highly narrow-minded state their debates on this critical issue. Allison MacFarlane, author of “Nuclear Power: Panacea for Future Energy Needs?”, believes that nuclear power should be revived. She argues that nuclear power will provide sufficient energy, while at the same time reducing carbon dioxide emissions. On the other hand, professor Kristin Shrader-Frechette, author of “Five Myths About Nuclear Energy”, argues that nuclear power is too expensive and unsafe for the environment, when there are renewable energy sources that are better for the environment and economy. I agree with Shrader-Frechette because she proves the five myths about nuclear energy wrong using extremely valid arguments, which exist to prove that nuclear power is not the best option for an energy source in our society.…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tannenwald, N., (1999) ‘The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Normative Basis of Nuclear Non-use’ International Organization 53(3): 433-48…

    • 2145 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Three Mile Island

    • 3044 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Though we have had worries and issues on how to handle our power situation in the future, nuclear power has always been a sparkling prospect. It has been gleaming there just waiting to be tapped. After the bombs and destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki the world started to explore other avenues to use the science and power of atoms and came to discover nuclear power. Although this technology seemed like a god sent, there are inherent problems with the use and deployment of nuclear power. These problems have the potential to cause significant loss of life. In fact they have caused the loss of life before. Due to these issues, nuclear policy has always been a hotbed of debate. In actuality only several of the hundreds of reactors in existence have had problems. The first noteworthy accident and the one that will be discussed today was the accident at the Three Mile Island complex, here in the USA. Another accident occurred several years after at the Chernobyl compound. This accident which took place in the former USSR is the worse reactor accident to date and massive casualties were incurred. In addition to these; the earthquake and tsunami in Japan, which occurred earlier this month has put several reactors there in potentially an even worse place than Chernobyl. Focusing on Three Mile Island, this almost horrific accident occurred in the late seventies and was very close to going super critical (i.e. that is melting down). This accident at the Three Mile Island nuclear complex has greatly affected the United States of America and international nuclear policy. In the USA no reactors have been built since this accident. The accident reignited people’s fears of nuclear power. Stepping back for a minute, nuclear power first started evolving in the 1950’s. While research in this area had been done well before the fifties it was all for the purpose of academic and military use. This…

    • 3044 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Energy Market

    • 6329 Words
    • 26 Pages

    “G8 split on nuclear power in energy security talks.” EU Business. March 16, 2006. Available at: http://www.eubusiness.com/Energy/060316103012.mt2l023a.…

    • 6329 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the world, countries are leaning towards nuclear energy due to the amount of energy it can produce with very little resources. This topic is worth investigating since energy is basically a must, now in the 21st century. It is now considered an essential to have energy in our lives to maintain our standards of living. We have gone to many different sources of energy other than nuclear energy such as coal, solar, wind, oil and more, but many of those energy source have flaws too. Some sources of energy will reach the peak of their production due to resources and will eventually fall, others pollute the environment just like nuclear energy and some just don’t produce enough energy for us to fully rely on them. Many countries needed a new source of energy since…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    and climate policy objectives to be met at least EUR 30 bn will have to be…

    • 10253 Words
    • 42 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Japan's Nuclearisation

    • 3591 Words
    • 15 Pages

    When North Korea declared the use of uranium enrichment on an industrial scale it caused international unease. This revelation brought to light the on-going issue of state’s nuclear capability. In a post-Cold war era the global arena is wary of any nuclear movement or development within states. An international non-proliferation treaty entered into force in 1970 holding the signatures of the nuclear states; the United Kingdom, the United States, France, Russia and China. It promotes cooperation and the goal of nuclear disarmament in an age where states arm themselves to deter other states from resorting to the use of nuclear weapons. Japan “is what non-proliferation specialists call a “threshold” nuclear weapons state – a …[state] that could stage a nuclear breakout virtually overnight should its electorate and leadership resolve to do so” (Holmes, 2012). For the purpose of this essay, the term nuclear will cover both nuclear energy and nuclear weapons as uranium can form both.…

    • 3591 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The highly praised neo-realist thinker Kenneth Waltz is of the opinion that Iran should go nuclear (Waltz, 2012). He considers that a nuclear Iran will bring nuclear stability in the area of the Middle East. There have been past antagonism and unsympathetic liaison between Iran and the US and her supporter Israel. The anxiety has lately been intensify by Iran’s nuclear ambition (Wege, 2013). At the same time Matthew Kroenig and Colin Kahl are in favor of attacking Iran only differentiating them with one of attacking as soon as possible ( Kroenig, 2012) while Colin wants to take the time with a more diplomatic means first and war as last resort (Kahl, 2012). The West has reacted to this endeavor by hitting Tehran with various sanctions and trade embargos on her commodities. We have seen how ineffective this is against North-Korea and yet they have in the end been able to develop nuclear weapons. After acquiring nuclear weapons for several years the North-Korean leadership has not directly decided to use it neither against their southern neighbors nor against Japanese and US military bases and installations. Thus the question poses: how will the region change if Iran acquires the Nuclear weapon?…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    DFD on bug tracking system

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Green World 63 a series of articles appeared which emphasised the Green Party’s policy of not supporting nuclear power. Green Party member and author Mark Lynas is one of a number of environmentalists who now advocate nuclear power as a sensible response to the climate crisis. Being as he was mentioned in the one of the articles, Mark asked for the opportunity to clarify his position on the issue. We obliged, but asked Jeremy Leggett, opposite, to defend the Green Party stance.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays