Preview

Assignment 4 Legal Research

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
515 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Assignment 4 Legal Research
Assignment Number Four Legal Reasearch, Writing and Civil Litigation
Part One
Issue
Under North Carolina law is Brad correct? That dismissing the action on the ground that the complaint was not specific enough and needs to be dismissed because it fails to state a claim upon relief should be granted? Failure to state a claim is frequently raised as a defnse in civil litigation.
Rule
The defense of failure to state a claim is provided for in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) (6) and in similar state court rules. Rule 12(b) states that derfenses should be presented in the Defendant's response to the complaint. However, the rule allows some defenses to be asserted in a seperate motion to the court, including the defense that the Plaintiff does not state a claim. Allowing the Defendant to respond in a seperate motion allows the court to dismiss quickly civil claims without legal merit. N.C. Gen Stat. 1A-1Rule 12 Mere Vagueness or lack of details is not a ground for Motion to Dismiss. Such a deficiency should be attacked by a motion for a more definite statement. Redevelopment Comm'n v. Grimes, 277 N.C. 634, 178 S.E. 2d 345 (1971); Brown v. Brown 21 N.C. App. 435, 204 S.E. 2d 534 (1974); Benton v. W.H. Weaver Constr. Co., 28 N.C. App. 91; 220 S.e. 2d 417 (1975). North Carolina Nat'l Bank v. McCarly and Co. 34 N.C. App. 689, 239 S.E. 2d, 583 (1977). While mere vagueness is not enough tot dismiss a complaint. The Complaint must sate enough to satisfy the requirements of the substantive law giving rise to the claim. Merely asserting a grievance is not enough Braun c. Glade Valley Sch. Inc. 7 N.C. App. 83, 334 S.E. 2d 404 (1985).

Analysis Rule 12(b) (6), permitting a Motion to Dismiss for Failure of the Complaints to State a Claim on which relief can be granted. Some courts have held that as the rule by it's terms refer to the statements in the complaint. When these cases have reached Circuit Court of Appeals, in situation where exta materis shows there is no

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The court decided that plaintiff's complaint states a cognizable cause of action against the defendants for the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress. Accordingly, the defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's amended complaint is denied.…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    H.J., Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Tel. Co., 492 U.S. 229 (1989). Also, a Court should not dismiss a Complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P 12(b)(6) “unless it appears beyond doubt that the Plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.” Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 (1957) . Dismissal, however, may be appropriate where the Complaint contains a detailed description of underlying facts, which fail to state a viable claim. Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 106-109 (1976)…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The plaintiff sued the defendants, claiming that she was sexually assaulted and beaten by hospital employees while she was hospitalized. The defendants were granted a dismissal of the case for non pros. The defendants claimed that the plaintiff failed to meet her requirement to file a certificate of merit within 60 days. As a result, the Court of Common Pleas,…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. According to the case, what must a party establish to prevail on a motion for summary judgment?…

    • 844 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    I corrected your cover page – all I had to do was center the five lines on the cover page and delete some spacing between the lines. Citations are not correct, spacing is a problem, basic keyboarding problems with a space before a period at the end of a sentence and a space before a comma within a sentence.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “judgment is properly granted when there is no triable issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 437c(c). A defendant or cross-defendant has met his or her burden of showing that a cause of action has no merit if that party has shown that one or more elements of the cause of action, even if not separately pleaded, cannot be established. Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 437(o)(2). Once the moving party defendant meets its burden, the burden shifts to the plaintiff to show a triable issue of material fact exists. Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 437c(o)(2). On appeal, the reviewing court exercises its independent judgment, deciding whether undisputed facts have been established that negate the opposing party's claim or state a complete defense. Cal. Lab. Code § 2922 establishes the presumption that an employer may terminate its employees at will, for any or no reason. A fortiori, the employer may act peremptorily, arbitrarily, or inconsistently, without providing specific protections such as prior warning, fair procedures, objective evaluation, or preferential reassignment”.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First Defendant Summary

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages

    They have insufficient knowledge of paragraph 19, and so deny it. Any money the Plaintiffs spent on agency and legal fees were not in waste.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nadel Et Al

    • 1394 Words
    • 5 Pages

    2. According to the case, what must a party establish to prevail on a motion for summary judgment? (3 points)…

    • 1394 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Under the California Code of Civil Procedure § 585 a judgment may be had, if the defendant fails to answer the complaint, but first requirements must be met and that means the plaintiff must have:…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury v. Madison brief

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Court ruled that the RESPONDENT violated its ministerial functions required by law by not delivering the commission, therefore the law provided the PETITIONER a remedy. In response to the third issue,…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The case being observed here was that of Deborah White vs. Patrick Gibbs and O 'Malley 's Tavern, case # 82A04-8876-CV-285. This was brought before a mock U.S. District Court panel of judges, in the Northern District of Indiana. The Plaintiff being Deborah White, and the Defendant being Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern. The Plaintiffs’ Attorneys are Amanda Babbit and Jakson Walsh and the attorneys for the defendant are Benjamin Walton and Jordan Van Meter. In this case the defendant’s attorneys are seeking a summary Judgment for their client. This is a kind of resolution that would allow for them to avoid going to trial only if the Judge sees fit to deem that there are no disputes to the material facts of this case. And on the opposing side the Plaintiff Deborah white is requesting that the courts deny the defendants request for summary judgment.…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Perfecting legal writing will help create a better understanding of the law and to become a good lawyer.…

    • 1007 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Held. The trial court erred in granting defendant judgment on the pleadings because the plaintiff’s complaint states a cause of action for breach of an express contract, and can be amended to state a cause of action independent of allegations of express contract.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    final paper legal research

    • 2230 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The paternity and filiation of a child conceived and born through surrogacy under the Family Code of the Philippines.…

    • 2230 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Christine Chinkin has observed that the classification of ‘hard’ and ‘soft’ law is unhelpful and misleading in reflecting enforceability in international law. What are the sources of international law? What is meant by ‘hard’ and ‘soft’ law? Do you agree with Chinkin’s assessment and why?…

    • 3845 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Best Essays