Preview

Assignment 1 Assess Organizational Readiness no name

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2381 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Assignment 1 Assess Organizational Readiness no name
Business 519: Project Risk Management
Assignment 1 – Assess Organizational Readiness
2014

Abstract:
The purpose of this paper is to provide for the application of project risk management theory to the case study concerning Flayton Electronics: Boss, I Think Someone Stole Our Customer Data. This will happen in four parts. In the portion of the paper we will look at some the Critical Success Factors of the business; address various factors concerning the project of recovering from the issue; develop some project risk recommendations and identify some of the initial risk categories that I see as present in the case study.
Background: Flayton Electronics, a second generation family business, has just been notified that there may have been a data breech associated with credit cards used at their stores. The initial reports indicates at least 1500 accounts may have been compromised although this number appears to be growing quickly as more banks and clearing houses are notified of the possible breech. Flayton is a small, regional electronics business with 32 stores in six (6) states. The case study is happening within 24 hours of first notification of the possible breech.

1. Analyze how the Critical Success Factors (CSFs) apply to the facts of the case study. Provide examples to support your analysis.
In order to respond to this first requirement we need to ensure we understand the definition of CSF and the categories at which we will be looking. Hillson and Simon (2012) define CSFs as “a condition that is required to ensure success and whose absence leads to failure” (p.236) and Heldman (2005) defines them as “those elements that must be completed in order for the project to be considered a success.” Based on these definitions the following CSFs and possible metrics for measuring and determining the results of the company’s efforts have been determined. Hillson and Simon have noted four categories into which Critical Success Factors (CSFs) fall:



Citations: Heldman, Kim (2005). Project Manager’s Spotlight on Risk Management. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass: Wiley Hillson, D. and Simon, P. (2012). Practical Project Risk Management: The ATOM Methodology. 2nd ed, Tysons Corner, VA: Management Concepts Press. Larson, E.W. and Gray, C.F. (2012, p. 214). Project Management: The Managerial Process, 5th Ed. McGraw-Hill Learning Solutions. Boston, MA.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Proj595 Risk Paper

    • 1690 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Cited: Cooper, D. F., Grey, S., Raymond, G., & Walker, P. (2005). Project Risk Management Guidelines:…

    • 1690 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unit 6 Assignment 2

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Without going into details regarding the theory of project risk management we present still, the definition of this concept as it is proposed by the Project Management Institute professionals who, in The Project Management Body of Knowledge Guide, [Duncan, W., R.,…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Risk Management Plan

    • 2116 Words
    • 9 Pages

    • Conduct organizational wide implementation The Project Management Team will need a proactive approach in the management of risks and related uncertainty. Management of risks for this project will follow a continuous risk management model, refined as the PLC develops. Involvement of support from the business, technical, executive, and external partners is crucial to having a viable risk management process. Tasks will be evaluated and identified for the mitigation of risks; uncertainty of organizational environmental factors will be included in the evaluation of impact and probability, as appropriate. This will ensure that tracking of progress, or lack thereof, occurs and necessary resources are identified for corrective/mitigating actions planned.…

    • 2116 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Gray, C. F. & Larson, E. W. (2008). _Project Management: The Managerial Process_. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hills Companies, Inc.…

    • 1150 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Before developing a risk management plan an analysis of risk needs to be performed. This analysis should include all aspects of the project that may be part of an uncertain event or condition that may have a positive or negative effect on the project objectives and outcome. The overall goal is to work to address any type of risk before they become problematic. Analyzing and relaying the level and probability of the risk to the stakeholders, sponsors and project team can help in reducing mistakes that can be cause for project failures. Some common mistakes that can be overlooked when analyzing risk, is not understanding the benefits of a risk management plan, not allowing time for risk management, not properly identifying and assessing risk.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Custom book (2011) BUS 519: Project Risk Management Case pack 2011.New York : John Wiley & Sons.…

    • 1800 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Ginsters Report

    • 4217 Words
    • 17 Pages

    1. Ginsters’ Critical Success Factors 1.1 CSFs According to Rockart and Bullen (1981), Critical Success Factors (CSFs) are the limited number of ways and the factors that are fundamental for the continual successful performance of a company. The identification of CSFs is important because it allows organizations to focus their efforts on building their capabilities to support their CSFs. On the other hand, it may even allow firms to assess whether they have the capabilities to develop the necessary requirements to meet CSFs. Daniel (1961) was the first to introduce the concept of CSF. The concept was then used to assist in defining the CEO’s information needs that are most critical for a business (Rockart, 1979) (Zwikael and Globersonz, 2006).…

    • 4217 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dia Communication Plan

    • 6799 Words
    • 28 Pages

    ISBN # 0-324-58800-3 or 978-0-324-58800-2 Hillson D. & Simon P. (2007).Practical Project Risk Management, The ATOM Methodology. Copyright © 2007 by Management Concepts, Inc. 8230 Leesburg Pike, Suite 800 Vienna, VA 22182. www.managementconcepts.com…

    • 6799 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY As the continued poor showing of the project management and business analysis discipline results in the stagnant and unimpressive current project success rates, MCLMG’s Portfolio / Program / Project Management Research Division has designed, developed, and deployed a more effective and robust project risk management model that supersedes the current “industry practices” of the limited 2 dimensional risk model based on the unit-less assessment of project risk potentials. This current model evaluates project risk potentials in only two (2) dimensions of “severity” and “likelihood” assigning to each an integer value of 1 (low) to 5 (high) of each parameter where upon the risk assessment is made by simply multiplying these values to obtain a qualitative risk priority profile of a unit-less, non-rigorous plane of values ranging from 1 to 25 with the non-assignment of the values 7, 11, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23, and 24 since these combinations are not valid products of two integer operands of 1 to 5.…

    • 4623 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Critical success factor (CSF) is the term for an element that is necessary for an organization or project to achieve its mission. It is a critical factor or activity required for ensuring the success of a company or an organization. The term was initially used in the world of data analysis, and business analysis. For example, a CSF for a successful Information Technology (IT) project is user involvement.…

    • 2722 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Risk management is a part of the project management processes. The nature of project management means the processes may be used throughout the project life cycle. For example executing a risk response triggers to identify the risks process to evaluate the impact (PMbok, 2008). The process of a risk management plan is to identify the risk, analyze those risks and monitor and control those risks. The objective is to decrease the probability of a negative event and make sure that they don’t wreak havoc on a program or project. We need to be proactive in our approach to risk…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Managing Risks

    • 2235 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Risk mitigation is a critical function of every project manager. A well-developed risk management process “attempts to recognize and manage potential and unforeseen trouble spots that may occur when the project is implemented” (Gray & Larson, 2006, p. 1). Risk mitigation begins with project planning. Based on previous experiences, lessons learned, schedule and budget constraints of the assigned project, the project team can identify all the risks, analyze each risk in terms of the severity of the impact, the likelihood of the occurrence, and the degree to which the risk can be controlled. Although a direct relationship between the amount of risk in a project and the opportunity for increased rewards exists, successful businesses take every advantage to minimize the risk in order to maximize the reward. The plan’s impact to cost and schedule must be reflected within the appropriate elements of the integrated cost and schedule control system.…

    • 2235 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Introduction According to the Project Management Institute’s Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge there are four steps for managing risks. In this paper there will be a look at two of the steps. In the text Project Management Risk Guidelines: Managing Risk in Large Projects and Complex Procurements, there is a chapter dedicated to Phase I and Phase II of the tender evaluation process. Essentially in each phase you are doing risk identification and risk quantification. The assignment is to compare the two phases discussed and then answer questions that compare the two phases. Since each phase is designed to serve a different purpose, you can’t really say one phase is better than another. Both phases are important in order to understand the risks during the tender evaluation process.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    FIELD REPORT TIPM AMOS

    • 2077 Words
    • 8 Pages

    POST GRADUATE DIPLOMA IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT YEAR: 2014 A FIELD REPORT ON RISK ASSOCIATED WITH PROJECTS…

    • 2077 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Thomsett Risk Tool Set

    • 6409 Words
    • 26 Pages

    PROJECT MANAGEMENT Risk in Projects The Total Tool Set © Rob Thomsett 2004 INTERNATIONAL thomsett…

    • 6409 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Powerful Essays