Preview

Assess Whether Plato Can Provide Objectively Correct Solutions To Moral Issues

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1451 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Assess Whether Plato Can Provide Objectively Correct Solutions To Moral Issues
Assess whether Plato can provide objectively correct solutions to moral issues (45m)
Plato aims to provide objective and absolute solutions to moral issues, his intelligible realm is where these solutions lie. Plato is a realist and views morality as an objective issue which has a right or wrong answer. Morality is about rationality.
Plato’s largest argument for providing objective moral solutions is his theory of the Forms. The forms are only accessible through reasoning and rationality, according to Plato they are part of the intelligible realm. They are objective, unchanging and infallible therefore we can derive and objective morality from reasoning and the Forms, most importantly the form of the good, in which everything in the world derives meaning and purpose. The objectivity of the forms provides the ideal that abstract concepts such as justice, beauty and morality can have an objective right or wrong answer in any circumstance, through their forms. The form of the good is the most important in providing solutions to moral issues as once you know the good, you automatically do the good. Plato implies that once you have knowledge of the form of the good through reasoning, it is impossible to do otherwise, therefore having knowledge of the form of the good leads to carrying out the objective, correct action in a moral issue. Therefore if you do not know the good, you will only carry out the morally wrong actions and you are irrational so you cannot be held morally responsible for these actions. As knowing the good leads to the good, and only philosophers can access the forms, then it follows that only philosophers can know the good and can provide objective correct solutions to moral issues.
The largest criticism Plato faces is what if his theory of the forms, on which he basis his whole philosophy, is not existent? Plato was unable to prove or provide much detail on the forms and what they are, thus many argue against him suggesting that the forms are not

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Plato believed the world we live in is only a world of appearances and that it wasn't actually that real. He believed that their was another world, this is called dualism. He believed this other world is where the true forms of everything existed and only left a mere imprint on our world. Plato argued this world was immutable (unchanging) and that it was only a world of ideas and concepts that made every object like what it is. For example there are lots of different types of cat. He believed in the world of the forms that what makes a cat a cat existed there and is imprinted onto our souls allowing us to identify all the different types of cat as cats.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato adopted persuasion by argument to provide an explanation about the societal issues. Therefore, he believes that proper steps have to be taken in order to persuade other groups. Firstly, Socrates strives to use three arguments to support just life in that a just man is good and wise while the unjust person is bad and ignorant. Injustice produces disharmony preventing effective actions, while justice helps one to live a much happier life. It shows that one will choose to be just rather than unjust due to the outcomes that result from both just and unjust behaviors. Plato depicts that evil is not the basis of strength, but of dissolution and discord.…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato’s Republic begins with a debate on the subject of morality. One by one, Cephalus, Polymarchus, and Thrasymachus put forth their definitions of morality and one by one, they come up short. None survive the merciless scrutiny of the author’s mentor, Socrates.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato believes that education is the surest way to an ideal society. In today’s society education is atopic brought up in debates quite frequently because it is important that the youth are educated so they can fill in jobs and run the country when they are older. This does not mean everyone gets an education, for there are many countries where education can not be afforded or is not the best. Yet in today’s school system students are not treated for their full potential.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato understood that there are concepts that we can all recognise in various things, for example the concept of beauty. We all recognise beauty in art, nature, people, or music, and we all understand the idea when we hear the word used. Although we can all recognise beauty, our opinions of what classes as beautiful are widely varied and subjective. The conclusions Plato drew from this is that beauty must exist, otherwise we would not know it at all. This is the Perfect Form of Beauty. However, we must have only partial knowledge of it or we would not have subjective opinions.…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In book II of Plato’s Republic, there is a discussion between Glaucon, Adeimantus, and Socrates. Glaucon and Adeimantus states that justice belongs to the class of goods, which we welcome for its own sake and for its consequences. Glaucon, then, picks Thrasymachos’ argument, that is better to live an unjust life than just life. In this dialogue, Glaucon challenges Plato to proof why be just is better than being unjust. For Glaucon human being is by nature competitive, for Plato human nature is either good or bad.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato and Moral Authority

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages

    After reading Plato’s Apology and Leviticus 17-27, I found several differences in the way people are judged for the crimes they have committed as well as, by what are actually considered crimes or sins. I want to explore these differences by asking two questions to each reading: What kind of behavior constitutes as a sin or a crime? What is the source of moral authority behind laws and legal judgments?…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    are right and wrong no matter the content of the act. It should be completely wrong to not treat everyone with respect based on who they are. Race, religion, sex and even medical diagnosis shouldn’t matter. Plato was an absolutist and he thought that as well as things being right and wrong, he thought that goodness itself really exists even after life itself. The highest form, the form of goodness had brought up the question of ‘What is goodness itself?”. Plato thought that goodness itself was the highest form of reality, which is an objective or absolute thing that existed eternally, beyond our limited world. He valued goodness very highly, comparing it to having the same importance that the sun has. We can look at this as having values and realizing that everything is important and good as well as all people. All people have a meaning to our society. We are all different because if we was all the same, we would be complaining of how bored we was. Plato thought that every moral situation was either right or wrong, and that our minds which were “distorted between pleasure and pain” could not perceive circumstances correctly, because we could not…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato believed that reality is more than what we sense around the world (e.g. taste, smell, hear, see and touch), he believed that behind these physical realities lies a perfect version of them in which he called Forms and that the greatest thing we can learn is to have knowledge and understanding of them. Plato’s theory means that what we can sense around us (for example a chair) is just a mere shadow of the perfect version which exists in the world of Forms. The perfect version of a chair is one in which for fills its purpose e.g. to be comfortable and to be sat on. Plato believed that everything had a perfect Form, from objects such as pens and books to things such as beauty and justice. He believed that to experience the world of Forms we had to become perfect philosophers.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thrasymachus Vs Plato

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In his writings he has describes two contrasting views of the important issue that is ultimately asking the question, why be moral? Plato and Thrasymachus represent the different and some-what opposing ideas on this topic of morality and self interest. Thrasymachus believes that the right thing to do is act unjustly or unmorally because one should always proceed to act in one's own self interest. He states, "Why should I be moral when it is not in my interest to be so?" This is called egoism proper. In his mind the perfect life would be to have a great reputation for living in perfect justice while being completely unjust. This would constitute a life of benefits, pleasure and rewards of injustices while still maintaining the reflection of a good…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Philosophy Hamlet Exam

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Plato’s moral theory consisted of the concept of the soul and the concept of virtue as function. To Plato, the soul has three parts; reason, spirit, and appetite. The reason we do things is to reach a goal or value, our spirit drives us to accomplish our goal, and our desire for things is our appetite. The three virtues that must be fulfilled to reach the fourth, general virtue are temperance, courage, and wisdom, which correlate with the three parts of the soul. In order to achieve inner harmony, every part of the soul must be fulfilling its proper function.…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Plato Defends Rationalism

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Plato was a highly educated Athenian Philosopher. He lived from 428-348 B.C. Plato spent the early portion of his life as a disciple to Socrates, which undoubtedly helped shape his philosophical theories. One topic that he explored was epistemology. Epistemology is the area of philosophy that deals with questions concerning knowledge, and that considers various theories of knowledge (Lawhead 52). Plato had extremely distinct rationalistic viewpoints. Rationalism is the claim that reason, or intellect, is the primary source of our fundamental knowledge about reality (55). By examining Plato’s philosophical position on the three basic epistemological questions, as well as analyzing his ability to justify the three anchor points of rationalism, it is clear to see that Plato was successful in defending rationalism.…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato's Ideal Society

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages

    plato's utopia had several features, but he basically tried to make a perfectly just society. in the republic, he examines a few concepts of justice, including justice being telling the truth and repaying your debts, doing good to friends and harm to enemies, and justice being what is in the interest of the stronger. he rejects all these ideas eventually and says that justice is based on a society's natural division of labor. for example, workers perform optimally when they are specialized- a construction worker can't possibly have expertise in medicine, likewise a doctor cant possibly have expertise in trade. also, each person is naturally suited for a certain task. for example, if you're really smart, you're better off being a lawyer than a landscaper (of course, these aren't the examples he gives, i'm just trying to simplify). so, to plato, each person has their own area of expertise that they must focus on. this is a prerequisite for justice, and justice results when everybody does only their designated role and doesn't interfere with the designated roles of others. the way in which he hopes to establish this is through education.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle vs Plato

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Plato felt that there are two different levels of reality compared to Aristotle who felt that there was only one level of reality. Plato’s way of thinking always came from ideas from within that were applied to the outside world as opposed to Aristotle whose ideas came from the outside world and then were applied within. These contrast ideas were a result in Aristotle believing that there is one level of reality. He believed that there was only one world, and that forms existed in particular things. Aristotle felt that everything was matter, and certain kinds of matter were composed into different things. He believed that form did not have a separate existence, but existed in matter. Plato, however, believed that there were two levels of reality. Physical and mental were two different things in his eyes. Physical is what is real and you can see and/or touch, and mental is what seems to be real but cannot be seen such as air. Plato believed that there are “two worlds” and that everything real has a form but does not symbolize that form.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Plato's Timaeus

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The philosophy of the early medieval world was a radically different philosophy than that of the Greeks. As a result of this modern philosophy appears to be split at times between the Greek’s thinking and the medieval thinking. This leads to the ultimate complication of reading and interpreting Plato. What do we as modern readers and modern philosophers understand Plato to be explaining, and what did Plato as a philosopher of Ancient Greece understand himself to be explaining.…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics