Preview

Assess the view that the Supreme Court

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1033 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Assess the view that the Supreme Court
Assess the view that the Supreme Court was the most important branch of the federal government in assisting African Americans achieve their civil rights in the period 1865-1992

Many people would agree that the Supreme Court was the most important branch of the federal government in assisting African Americans achieve their civil rights between 1865-1992. For example, the Supreme Court overturned African American convictions in the Powell vs. Alabama Case in 1932 and the Brown vs Board of Education case of 1954 proved to be a milestone in the strive for equality for African Americans. However, the roles of the Presidency and Congress cannot be overlooked as they also proved to be influential in the fight for equal rights as proved by the Emancipation Proclamation of 1865 by Abraham Lincoln and The Civil Rights Act which was passed by Congress in 1875. It may appear that the Supreme Court was the most important aspect of the federal government in assisting African Americans achieve their civil rights, but it is important to consider the roles of the other parts of the American federal government.

In 1932, the Powell vs Alabama Case reversed the convictions of nine black men who were accused of raping two white women. All the defendants, apart from one, were sentenced to death after a series of one-day trials and they were given minimal access to their lawyers before their trials which meant their defenses weren’t precisely planned. The convictions were reversed because the Alabama Supreme Court ruled that they weren't given a fair trial, they were denied legal counsel, and the juries excluded members of their race. This was a significant ruling because the Supreme Court had recognised that African Americans were being treated unconstitutionally, and the little rights that they did have, had been violated. This evidence shows that the Supreme Court was important in assisting African Americans achieve their civil rights because the Courts had accepted that African

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Tom Robinson’s case in To Kill A Mockingbird resembles many Civil Rights Cases, specifically in the case of Powell vs. Alabama. In Powell vs. Alabama, several young white men…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Brethren, co-authored by Bob Woodward and Scott Armstrong, is an in-depth documentary of the United States Supreme Court from 1969 to 1975, under the leadership of Warren Burger. The book attempts to present the reader with what "really" goes on in the Supreme Court. It describes the conferences, the personality of justices, and how justice's feel toward each other, items which are generally hidden from the public. This book is comparable to a lengthy newspaper article. Written more as a source of information than of entertainment, The Brethren is the brutal truth, but not boring. The storytelling is clearly slanted against the Burger court but the overall quality of the work makes…

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    render Jim Crow Laws unconstitutional. That decision began an age of Judicial Activism for the…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Scottsboro Trial and the trial of Tom Robinson are almost identical in the forms of bias shown and the accusers that were persecuted. The bias is obvious and is shown throughout both cases, which took place in the same time period. Common parallels are seen through the time period that both trials have taken place in and those who were persecuted and why they were persecuted in the first place. The thought of "All blacks were liars, and all blacks are wrongdoers," was a major part of all of these trails. A white person 's word was automatically the truth when it was held up to the credibility of someone whom was black. Both trials were perfect examples of how the people of Alabama were above the law and could do whatever they wanted to the black people and get away with it. In both trials lynch mobs were formed to threaten the black people who were accused. Judge Hornton tried many times to move the case to a different place so that a fair trial could take place and not be interrupted by the racist people. Finally was granted to move the case even though the lynch mobs threatened to kill everyone who was involved in the case if it were to be moved. In this essay the bias and racism in both trials are going to be clarified and compared to each other.…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Federal Court System contains three levels of courts: first, U.S district courts and various courts of limited jurisdiction (trial courts of general jurisdiction). Second, U.S courts of appeals (intermediate courts of appeals). Finally, the highest level of the three level federal court system is the United State Supreme Court. Today, the United State Supreme Court is located in Washington D.C.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the 1950s and 1960s, movements to obtain civil rights for black Americans have had historical significance. More justices were retrieved back then than it is today. Why is that? During the Civil Rights Era, African Americans obtain more justice than African Americans today, because of the greater number of citizen's involvement, boldness, and non-violent protests.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justices of the United States Supreme Court are strategic actors who strive to secure policy outcomes as close to their preferred outcome as possible. Accomplishing this sometimes requires justices to not always pursue their true policy preferences and sometimes it requires justices to ignore legal and policy questions. In this essay, I will analyze how justices were strategic in a few landmark supreme court cases.…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Case Study

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages

    That the Supreme Court exercises a policy making role has been an established fact ever since Maybury vs. Madison defined the Court’s role in judicial review of existing law. By choosing which cases to review and by establishing precedents by way interpretation of a law’s meaning and applicability the Court influences the course of action adopted not only by government but by individuals and businesses who consider the implications of the Court’s actions. In adjudicating disagreements of alternative interpretations of a law the Supreme Court establishes policies which have implications extending beyond the specific case in question and into social policy at large. In choosing which cases to review the Court calls attention to certain issues…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    After the Civil War had come to an end, African Americans in the South quickly made use of their new-found political and social rights, employing their right to vote from the Fifteenth Amendment and serving as prominent political figures (Tindall & Shi, 2010, p. 722). However, the formerly fervent commitment to Radical Reconstruction soon dwindled (Tindall & Shi, 2010, p. 739). Many of the advances toward civil equality were soon erased:…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Edward v. State case leads to the development of a legal tussle to justify self representation as part of the accused’s constitutional rights. After undergoing evaluation by two psychiatrists, Ahmad Edwards got diagnosed with schizophrenia and as a result a declaration was taken…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The part that shocked many people was there was no physical evidence connecting either McCollum or Brown to the crime scene. Only thing was a witness said they had suspicion, and that was it. When the two brothers were taken into custody they were interrogated hard. Brown’s brother didn’t have a lawyer present, and the police just kept interrogating him. Finally he decided he wanted to go home, and told a story on killing the girl. The police told Brown that his brother admitted to the murder, and so after five hours of hard interrogating he finally just signed a statement also.…

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Take an edge on whether or not or not you suspect the Supreme Court is attentive to popular opinion. Examine the extent to that popular opinion ought to have an effect on Supreme Court choices. Support your response with a minimum of 3 (3) samples of the perceived effects of popular opinion on Supreme Court choices.…

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assess the view that Booker T. Washington was the most important leader in the development of African American Civil rights in the period 1865 to 1915?…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Supreme Court Essay

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Supreme Court is the highest federal court in the United States. It rules over all federal courts and state courts when pertaining to cases that involve federal laws. Moreover, the Court has one Chief Justice of the United States and eight associate Justices that have been nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate. Amongst the Justices there are liberals, conservatives, and a moderate. The liberal side consists of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Justice Elena Kagan, and Justice Stephen Breyer. The conservative wing includes Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Antonin Scalia, Justice Clarence Thomas, and Justice Samuel Alito. There is also Justice Anthony Kennedy whom can be known as a moderate. He is most…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court has played a very important part in preserving the rights (and building them) of minority groups also. Politicians invariably sway their work towards the majority as it is the majority that will vote them back into power. This has been called the "tyranny of the majority" which has meant that the minorities have been left behind in the rush for votes. Chief Justice Marshall argued that there was no other institution in existence that could defend the rights of the minorities other than the Supreme Court. The 1954 decision of the Supreme Court is indicative of its power. Eisenhower had no great interest in reform in general and Congress was dominated by right wing southern Democrats who did not champion the civil rights movement. Therefore, only the Supreme Court could do this and the south’s educational policy based on segregation was overturned at a stroke. Enforcing it was another issue.…

    • 583 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays