Preview

Assess the View that Stalin's Policy in Eastern Europe was mainly Defensive in Nature

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1731 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Assess the View that Stalin's Policy in Eastern Europe was mainly Defensive in Nature
Assess the View that Stalin’s Policy in Eastern Europe was Mainly Defensive in Nature

Stalin’s policy in Eastern Europe can be construed to seem very defensive; however arguments can be made to suggest that there were alternative motives to his desire to expand Soviet influence in the Eastern nations. The legitimacy towards a defensive claim is due to the critical nature of the Nazi invasion of Russia during the Second World War, which was through countries such as Poland and Czechoslovakia. Therefore Stalin’s fear of further invasion, especially in a nuclear world as proved by the Americans in Japan, allows his policy to be justified. This is only to a certain extent though because there were instances where some might argue that Stalin’s policy took a much more aggressive turn towards the expansion of Communism. Despite these two radically different attitudes regarding Soviet policy, action and response of the USA and Soviet Union suggest a misunderstanding of each other’s aims for the future of Europe, thus creating a rift between the two resulting in the Cold War. Stalin’s attitude is arguably mainly defensive due to the destruction of the Soviet economy, infrastructure and population during the Second World War. Over 20 million were killed, but this wasn’t the only instance where Stalin’s trust was betrayed. Source A points out these events that took place over the course of the former half of the 20th century: “the West had poured thousands of troops into Russia between 1917 and 1920, refused to cooperate with the Soviets during the 1930’s, tried to turn Hitler against Stalin in 1938, reneged on promises about the second front and in 1945 tried to penetrate areas Stalin deemed crucial to his security”. From this long extract, it seems completely justified that Stain’s policy would be defensive. Furthermore, his intentions in Eastern Europe did not surpass that of the territory which he had been given. Source B backs this by claiming that “The Russians

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Gaddis Cold War Summary

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Gaddis re-examines the Cold War with new information from all around the globe, creating a “new” cold war history. Gaddis pinpoints the start of the Cold War as 1947 and notes “the regime, personality, and ideological explanations for the Cold War point to an underlying defensive motivation: the need to expand and assert control to save Stalin and the Soviet Union.” (Lebow, p.628) Gaddis also sustains that Stalin’s personality and paranoia influenced events. It seems the “new” cold war history is actually the same as the “old” cold war standpoint because Gaddis concluded: “who then was responsible [for the Cold War]? The answer, I think, is authoritarianism in general, and Stalin in particular.” (Gaddis, p.294)…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1945 and 1946, there were increasing debates within the United States government over how to deal with the Soviet Union. Should the United States now see the Soviets as an "evil empire" that threatened to undermine the peace and freedom of an American-led "free world"? The influential 1946 memo to President Truman said that the Soviets were a global threat to peace. It said that the Soviet Union had a secret plan to conquer the world and spread communism throughout the world. The Soviets refusal to accept American leadership and a global democratic, capitalist community of nations, demonstrated that capitalism and communism could not peacefully co-exist. The Soviet domination of Eastern Europe after World War II and the continuing Soviet military build up was proof that the Soviet Union was threatening global peace and security…

    • 1024 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Cold War was dominated by American and Soviet tensions. Each power’s actions influenced the response of the other. Therefore, the focus of America often became the focus of the Cold War in general. Specifically, the Cold War was not concentrated on countries that were threatened with communism, but on America’s fight against them. There are events America was uninvolved in that were still part of the Cold War, such as the 1956 Hungarian Revolution, but they were still influenced by US policy. In Hungary, America’s decision not to step in led to the revolt’s suppression. Therefore, the interpretation is mistaken on an important point. In truth, the actual realities of the Cold War were based on political decisions in…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The long term issues of their ideological rivalry which was present between the USSR and the West since the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917 was a significant contributory factor in the development of a hostile relationship between them. The great power rivalry was evident during the years of 1917 to 1941; the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917 saw the rise of Lenin which meant a rise in Communism. It can be said the Soviet foreign policy was driven by communist ideology rather than national security. This was a threat of a totalitarian state. Ideology of Marxism was alien to the USA as left wing politics were unheard of; this was especially threatening as Marxist ideology saw the destruction of capitalist societies such as the USA. Its egalitarian values and its attacks on the freedoms held to be so important in a Liberal Democracy.…

    • 1792 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alliance: Cold War Essay

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages

    3. “The Cold War was caused by fear, not aggression.” To what extent does this view explain how the Cold War developed between 1945 and 1949? (2001)…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Warsaw Pact Significance

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Tensions had long been brewing between the eastern bloc and its frontrunner and big brother, The Soviet Union and the western powers primarily led by the United States of America. Fissures had appeared between the old allies over Germany, Korea as well as ideological, diplomatic and military operations. These culminated in the final divide between east and west, Communism and Capitalism, international revolution and economic interest; this divide was formalized through the North Atlantic Treaty Organization or NATO and the later formation of the Warsaw Pact in the east. This essay will examine the roles of both NATO and…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Korean War Containment

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Since even before the end of World War II, tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union began to plague their alliance. As soon as the Soviet Union threatened to force smaller nations under their communist sphere of influence, the United States adopted what was called a policy of containment. It was an effort to bring to a halt the Soviet Union’s potential for forcing other parts of Asia into communism. The first policy of this effort was the Truman Doctrine of 1947, which…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    setting up in that part of the world was something the United States could live with.” The US was rather more concerned for a mutual benefit and wanted a working relation with the USSR. The U.S. were most interested in the west Europe, they wanted to introduce there ideology, demarcation, by trying not to collaborate, “,” Roosevelt-style—that is, by trying to work hand-in-hand with each other on whatever problems turned up. Instead, they could get along by pulling apart.…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Quite recently, I was presented with the opportunity to visit the Soviet Union. During my visit, I discovered many horrific and deceiving things about the Soviet Union leader, Joseph Stalin. Stalin, has been lying to the world, and the people of the Soviet Union agree.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People feared being taken by the Secret Police in the ‘bread trucks’ and of being sent to the Gulag in Siberia where survival in the brutal conditions was highly unlikely. At one point at least one in twenty people were in the Gulag, and as a result, the country ran largely on slave labour. Although many argue that Stalin prepared Russia for the war, it also should be noted that he killed off at least 50 per cent of the army officers during the Purges out of pure paranoia, leaving the army brutally unprepared for war. The some accomplishments and advances are therefore overshadowed by the loss and suffering. Most people were unable to even reap the benefits while dying, locked in the Gulag or living in a state of constant fear. And if Stalin had been on the “wrong side” in the war would he still be viewed by the world as the same man? In fact many believe that he was just as bad as Hitler himself. Slaughtering millions should not be overshadowed by the few positives and should not just be just diminished to a means to an end for the greater good of the…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Source 2 And 3 Essay

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Source 3 by Stalin is more valuable than Source 2 by Churchill in explaining why the Soviet Union wanted to establish control over Eastern European States. Churchill does not ‘directly’ state any reasons why the Soviet Union wanted to establish control over Eastern European States. Stalin’s speech’s topic is basically explaining this. In order to come to a conclusion, it is important to analyse the historical context of the sources, whilst also considering who it is addressed to and what the emphasis of the Sources is.…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the definitive factors of Stalin’s Russia is the mass array of terror he cast over his nation during his tyrannous reign which was fuelled by purges of people from all walks of life; this stemmed from kulaks on the collectivised farming to ‘saboteurs’ in the industrial aspects who were said to be at fault for un met quotas. Stalin held his country in peril, but for what reason? Ultimately it can be regarded as a disproportionate amount of fear and suspicion blinding Stalin in extenuating paranoia thus leading to the terror seen in the years from 1936-39. Although this is not the full reason, it must also be taken into account the economic difficulties and external threats faced at the time, so Stalin’s fear is not the full reason to the extent of the terror.…

    • 2055 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The split between Josip Broz Tito, leader of Yugoslavia, and Joseph Stalin, head of the Soviet Union, is arguably one of the most watershed moments in Soviet history. It was a sign of a rising and powerful Yugoslavia, the first break in the Eastern bloc, and inspired a shift in Soviet policy and political thought. Focusing on the timespan from 1941 to 1948, I claim that, though the break between the two leaders was caused by a variety of factors, the root cause was Stalin’s prioritizing of foreign relations with the West. Stalin’s attempts to appease the Western powers went against Tito’s interests in spreading Yugoslavia’s influence. This is particularly true regarding Tito’s involvement in the Greek civil war, and his relations with Albania. It was a shock to Tito, and to the rest of the world, that Stalin decided to placate the West rather than side with Yugoslavia on these matters.1 However, realistically speaking, the Soviet Union was in no position to provoke the Western world post-World War II. Therefore, it is my thinking that the main source of friction between Stalin and Tito stemmed from their disagreements in prioritizing good relations with the West.…

    • 5450 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Soviet

    • 2357 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Soviet foreign policy throughout the period from 1919 to 1945 is confusing and often contradictory. By the 1920’s the Bolshevik communists found themselves the leaders of a former Great Power which was pulled by conflicting tendencies. On the one hand, communist ideology preached a world-wide “worker’s revolution” whose goal was the dissolution of all nation-states. On the other hand, Russia needed the support of other nations in order to rebuild its political, economic and military power. The result is a foreign policy which is best described as schizophrenic as the Soviet leadership aided and abetted revolution aimed at destroying the traditional international order while also trying to maintain a place in that same system.…

    • 2357 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Submitted To

    • 3008 Words
    • 10 Pages

    This term paper is exploring a nuclear policy of two major powers during the cold war and this paper also examines the military strategies applied by two different ideological blocs to counter each other.…

    • 3008 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays