Structured interviews involve the interviewer following a set of questions, without the addition of anything that isn’t written down. The interviewer is given strict instructions and is told to complete each interview in the same order, word for word and cannot make any personal judgements. The practical advantages for this type of interview are that it is quick and fairly cheap in comparison to an unstructured interview. This is because the interviewer has to remain value free meaning that he/she is not allowed to ask any of their own, personal questions in response to the participant and each interview should last about the same length of time, if it overruns, then it could cost more money and become time consuming. In addition, the results can be easily quantified, as structured interviews use close-ended questions with coded answers. The practical disadvantage for this type of interview is that it may be time-consuming and may require a lot of money to employ dozens of interviewers and data-inputting staff.
Structured interviews are preferred by Positivists, including Marxists and Functionalists. This is because they believe society can be studied like a science, which means that they attempt to establish cause and effect relationship between the variables involved in this type of interview. They also favour quantitative data, as structured interviews provide the interviewer with the opportunity to identify the patterns and trends, as they can categorise the answers given to them by the respondent. This in turn allows for generalisations to be made, which could be then true for the entire population. In addition, structured interviews removes the risk of interviewer effect, as the interviewer has a limited role and just asks the questions created on their list, not making up new ones as they respond to what the interviewee has said, which could jeopardise the entire research. This in turn will help the interviewer to remain value free. Therefore, these factors outlined shows that structured interviews are strong in reliability and representativeness, which explains why positivists favour this type of research.
However, there are problems of using this interview. The initial problem is that interviewees have to force their views into the researchers’ categories. Often these categories are too narrow, overlap or are open to interpretation. Sometimes, some of the answers interviewees would like to give are not available. Therefore, this type of interview can be invalid for this reason. Furthermore, with a set list of fixed response questions and answers, there is still some interviewer effect and how the interviewee perceives the interviewer may well influence their responses. As a result, this could cause psychological harm and this is considered an ethical issue in this type of research that could have an effect on the validity of research.
Unstructured interviews do not involve a set list of fixed response questions. Instead, they are open-ended and free-flowing, which allows the interviewee to respond in their own words and raise issues whenever they feel it’s relevant to the research. There are practical issues of using this type of interview. The initial problem of using this interview is that it is time consuming; each interview can often last up to a few hours, especially if you are studying illiterate criminals or participants who have an impairment, which makes it difficult for them to articulate themselves and hold a normal conversation and it can take a long time to transcribe this data. In spite of this of setback, this type of interview is rich in qualitative data, which makes the data become valid in comparison to the structured interview.
Unstructured interviews are preferred by Interpretivists and Feminists. This is because they believe that the informality of the interview allows rapport to be built up. This means that the participant will build up trust and confidence with the interviewee. As a result, the interviewee is likely to open up to certain areas and this will enhance the validity of the researchers’ findings. This makes it a good technique for sensitive areas of sociology, such studying those women who are victims of domestic violence.
However, an ethical issue of this type of interview is that it can cause psychological harm to either the participant and/or the interviewee. Furthermore, these types of interviews can place anyone involved in danger, especially if you’re studying violent criminals. Therefore, the researcher must plan and make considerations before implementing this type of interview.
Additionally, positivists would argue that this type of interview could lack objectivity. This is because the interviewer usually uptakes a value laden stance in this type of interview. This means that his/her presence and the way questions are asked could affect the results of the research (e.g. leading questions). Furthermore, the interviewer’s facial expressions, body language and voice tone can all have an effect on how answers are given by the respondent. As a result of this, the interviewer may even offer their own opinions which may bias the results completely and bias may also occur during the detailed analysis process. Therefore, Validity and reliability are lowered because of the amount of bias that is endured throughout this type of research and this is why unstructured interviews are not favoured by positivists.
In conclusion, how valuable are interviews in sociological research? It depends on the sociologists’ theoretical position; positivists see the quantitative data generated by formal, structured interviews more valuable. In contrary, Interpretivists see the qualitative data generated by informal, unstructured interviews more valuable. In spite of this, there are always issues with either type of interviews. Therefore, the best solution to overcome them is to use both structured and unstructured elements as the research situation demands. Structured elements may be very useful in identifying patterns of behaviour whilst informal elements may be more appropriate in uncovering explanations of those patterns. This can be illustrated in Dobash and Dobash’s study on domestic violence, where they used both element s of interviews to research domestic violence.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Research on interviews has generally shown that standardized procedures are higher in their reliability and validity than unstructured interviews. Learning how structured interviews are constructed is an important component of the selection process, as is getting a “feel” for what it’s like to give and receive an interview. This case gives you an opportunity to do both.…
- 2288 Words
- 10 Pages
Powerful Essays -
A theoretical strength of the use of an unstructured interview is that it is high in validity, as in…
- 487 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Using information from item B and elsewhere, examine the usefulness of questionnaires in sociological research.…
- 1272 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The choice of data collection is important in any type of research study since it determines the accuracy of the results based off the study's goals. The choice of using telephone interviews could have been as result of the pressed time that a researcher has, or the lack of funds to do it at a greater level of efficiency. However, there exist advantages of using this mode in the collection of data. To start with, telephone interviews are basically cheaper to conduct than personal interviews. If the number of prospects are many and sparsely spread out, then the researcher would find that telephone interviews saves them time, which translates into costs. In addition, telephone interviews are best when faced with tight time constraints. From the convenience of any location with a signal, a researcher is able to contact the prospects easily. In terms of control and management, telephone interviews are quite easy to administer as the researcher is able to lead the way into getting information and…
- 882 Words
- 4 Pages
Powerful Essays -
One advantage of unstructured interviews is it produces valid data; valid data is data that is true to life, opinionated and cannot be analysed. This is an advantage because qualitative data is received, anti-positivists prefer qualitative data as it gives motives behind actions. However, valid data is not reliable as if you repeat the interview; you will not get the same results as human behaviour is unpredictable.…
- 373 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The interview was Semi-structured, the advantages of using this method were that, the audience is specifically targeted it is also the best way to capture how a…
- 1061 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Positivists are mainly interested in research methods that achieve their main goals of reliability, generalisability and representativeness, for this reason, they favour structured interviews as they achieve these goals. This is because structured interviews often have questions and answers that are standardised; they are reliable because they can be therefore replicated. Positivist sociologists also prefer to use structured interviews when conducting research because the pre-coded responses mean that quantitative data can be produced and so cause-and-effect relationships can be established. Also, structured interviews are representative and can therefore be generalised, because of the fact that they are often large-scale.…
- 562 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Unstructured interviews are a research method which entails a sociologist asking participants a series of open-ended questions in an unstructured format. This method has both strengths and weaknesses, but is overall preferred by interpretivists as it provided qualitative data and is highly valid.…
- 439 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The diamond-shaped structure begins in a very specific way, then more general issues are examined. Diamond structured interview concludes with specific questions. It is useful in keeping the interviewee’s interest and attention through a variety of…
- 259 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
There are also some disadvantages to unstructured interviews such as it takes time and can cost a lot of money; although this method is very effective at finding out detailed information about a person and their life, it can take a lot of time to conduct an interview and even longer as it is unstructured so the interviewer can ask as many questions as they like; it could cost quite a lot as you might need to hire an office to do so, and if you need to interview a lot of people over a few days the cost could rise very quickly. Also interview bias is another disadvantage; this means that the interviewer can ask questions that can influence the answer, which then affects the outcome of the results. Interviewer bias can be illustrated through the use of leading questions for example “Do you get on well with your boss?” this question can make the interviewee question…
- 579 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
There are two ways an interview can be written up. One is as a regular news story (either straight or narrative). The other is in a "Question and Answer" ("Q & A") format.…
- 523 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
An interview would be more structured activity; wherein interviewer can prepare a series of questions and prepare himself; whereas interviewee would not have any idea about the questions and therefore they would be unprepared and this effect the interview in various ways.…
- 715 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Semi-structured interviews are used when the researcher knows what questions he or she wants to ask, but doesn’t no know what answers to expect. In semi-structured interviews, questions are asked in the same order in each interview, and responses to these open-ended questions may be probed so that the interviewee has the freedom to respond as he or she wishes. The important point is that unstructured interviews or guided interviews are methodological strategies to be used within qualitative methods –methods that are theoretically based and have a particular perspective that guides the data collection, analysis, and…
- 587 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
There are various problems that occur when using a type of interview, but whichever one the sociologist is using, different problems will amount. There are four main types of interviews. They are; Structured interviews, Unstructured interviews, semi-structured interviews, and group interviews.…
- 1134 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Structured interview is a specific set of questions that can be asked to any person to help diagnose an abnormal psychological disorder. Before I began my structured interview I read through the set of questions to get the flow of the interview. I also tried to imagine what a person might hold back about and made some side notes on how I would try to encourage the patient to give more information. I have not given many formal interviews such as the structured interview. If I were to become a clinician I would probably prefer the unstructured format. However I did learn several things about clinical interviews and there were things that I did and did not like. In the following paragraphs I will describe my trial experience.…
- 976 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays