Preview

Assess The Contribution Of Marxism To Our Understanding Of Society

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2534 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Assess The Contribution Of Marxism To Our Understanding Of Society
Assess the contribution of Marxism to our understanding of society
[33 marks]
Marxism is a macro/structural approach to society, meaning that it looks at the large-scale societal structure for answers about how society works and operates. They believe that structure is categorised into two kinds of structure; the infrastructure and the superstructure.
They believe the infrastructure is made up of the economic base and is made up of the social relations between the producers and who owns the means of production. The superstructure however is made up of the social institutions of the modern day society. These can include agents of social control such as the family and the education system. Considering this it’s easy to see that they believe the superstructure is imposed around the infrastructure.
Marxism at it’s core, is about the class struggle, however, between the two groups isolated in the Infrastructure. Those whom own the means of production, and those whom use the means of production. The groups are called the Bourgeoisie, or ruling class, and the Proletariat, or working class. Most of the Maxist perspective is based on observations of the fast paced development of the western world, particularly the Capitalist countries however, as that is what they blame most, if not everything on, because they believe in the Capitalist society, the owners of the means of production, the Bourgeoisie, continually seek to exploit their labourers, the Proletariat for profit.
They believe both groups have power, however;
The Bourgeoisie have the power to man and crew the State, and they believe the Proletariat have their labour power, which they sell to the Bourgeoisie in return for a wage. This wage is often considered minimal, in order to maximise profit for the Bourgeoisie. Karl Marx said that this was one of the causes of economic crisis’ in society, and that crisis’ will continue to occur until Capitalism is abandoned, or until the system literally collapses on itself.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marxism is the political and economical theories of Karl Marx, which later developed into the basis for communism…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The bourgeoisie, as Marx has described them are not revolutionary simply because it is in their best interest for things to remain as they are. For the workers, both socially and geographically divided; a gap that is constantly fluctuating in modern times, to compete for smaller and smaller wages that are losing their…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marxism is a theory which sees all society’s institutions as helping to maintain class inequality and capitalism…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marxism is a useful conflict theory in helping us to understand why there was obedience, particularly in the past in society. Marx was seen as an economic determinist, as he believed that the functioning and running of society was based upon the economy. Because of this, Marx says that is why there was a divide between the proletariat (working class who have only their skills to sell) and the bourgeoisie (the ruling class who own the means of production). The bourgeoisie cannot operate without the proletariat, as they cannot produce products, and similarly the proletariat cannot operate without the bourgeoisie, as they need them so they can be paid a wage and feed their families. Therefore, even though the Bourgeoisie were exploiting the proletariat and the proletariat could have walked away to stop being exploited, they never walked away as they needed the money. On the other hand, this can be viewed from a different perspective. The reason why these people may have not left their jobs is because they could have been in a state of false consciousness, whereby they were unaware of their exploitation by the bourgeoisie. This helps us to understand society as the Marxism theory provides reasoning on how the bourgeoisie were able to exploit the proletariat, which in turn fuelled capitalism and allowed the ruling elite to maintain their profits. It is also relevant to today’s society, as it helps to explain why many people who are in a hard laboured, low paid job (e.g. Factory workers) do not leave, despite hating their job, and this is because they need the money to survive.…

    • 2098 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    the Functionalist view that industrial capitalist societies are meritocracies and that every ones’ position in society is based on talent and hard work. Bowles and Gintis suggest ideas for why this is the case. They bases their theory around the idea of education being an ideological state apparatus. Bowles and Gintis’ theory is based on the ‘long shadow of work’ and the legitimating of inequality.
When speaking of the ‘long shadow of work’, Bowles and Gintis are referring to the strong relationship between social relationships at school and at work – they believe this helps education to play its major role in reproducing a labour force with hardworking, disciplined workers. Educations do this through the hidden curriculum and the correspondence theory. The hidden curriculum relates to many features of the workplace. An example of this would be that in school the hidden curriculum teaches students to abide by rules and accept punishment, this corresponds to the workplace where students would conform to rules and not argue with your boss. People believe that society and the education system is meritocratic. Bowles and Gintis believe this to be false, as in reality it is legitimating the inequalities that exist in society.
Althusser sees education as an ideological state apparatus. This is where the government issues ruling class ideas through different institutions, or apparatus, in this case education is the main apparatus. This is needed by capitalism to transmit the idea that the inequalities in society are justified as society is meritocratic. This helps capitalism by preparing students for their future jobs. The working class are taught to accept their future exploitation in the workplace. Where as the middle class are prepared for management roles supported by their qualifications.
However, these views from the Marxists are merely ideas and theories, as…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Founded by Karl Marx, Marxism is a school of thought which explores the relationship between the upper and lower classes of society. It was taught through Marxism that the main cause for historical change was disputes between social classes. This social warfare stemmed from the belief that the state, or government, for as long as it has existed, has used its authority to oppress the working masses for the benefit of the wealthy few. The relationship between the proletariats, the working class, and the bourgeoisie, the rich, was posited as one of opposition and conflict. Marx believed that a successful capitalist-run society was impossible and doomed to fail.…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marxism is a conflict view that sees society as being based on class divisions and exploitation. Marxists argue that in society there are two classes – the bourgeoisie which is the ruling class and the proletariat which is the working class. The capitalist class owns the means of production and make their profit by exploiting the labour of the working class. This creates class conflict that could threaten the stability of capitalism or even result in a revolution to overthrow it. Social institutions such as the education system reproduce class inequalities and play an ideological role by persuading exploited workers that inequality is justified and acceptable.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marxism is a worldview and method of societal analysis that focuses on class relations and societal conflict. Marxist sociologists believe that economics are what determines society. These include things like: politics, religion, law and culture. Basically they think that the way goods are made and distributed determines the ways…

    • 601 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    unit 7 p1

    • 1140 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Marxism was introduced and studied by Karl Marx during 1818 and 1883. The Marxist view is based on the conflicts and interests of the society, it also strongly highlights on the importance of conflict in societies and communities. They also believe that economics are the bases of progressing and social life this can be achieved by struggling through social classes. The two classes that Marx discussed about were the Bourgeoisie and Proletariat. The Bourgeoisie class is a small powerful group who may have owned factories or own companies whereas the Proletariat is a poorer group of workers. The way a Marxists thinks is based on the financial structures and systems as well as social class meaning that these factors are vital in the Marxist view.…

    • 1140 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In sociology, Marxism explains social change and movements. Developed by Karl Marx in the mid-1800s, Marxism holds that in a capitalist society the owners of the means of production oppress those who work in them. For example, the people who own large corporations exploit corporate employees, who perform unrewarding work for little pay. Resulting class conflict leads to social change in the form of revolution, as the workers overthrow the ruling class. In general, social change arises from class conflict. Marx thought classes would disappear in a communist…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marxism, created by philosopher Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, is an economic system that criticizes capitalism. Many often think of Marxism as a type of socialism. Marxism is the foundation that communism is built on which says that one should live in a “socialist, classless society” (Marxism). Marx and Engels wrote a book entitle “The Communist Manifesto,” which encourages the working class to overthrow the upper class. He makes a point of saying that Marxism is against capitalism because it is an exploitation of the working class. He believed that a socialist economy would work far better with a big population than would a capitalist economy. Another important idea of Marxism is historical materialism. Marx believed that history was shaped by people’s materialistic ways of living. A person’s will to survive is shown by their want to acquire things to keep on living. Marx and Engels were the first to predict that industrial…

    • 1513 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the ages of mankind, economics has deeply influenced societies and governments. Feudalism, a government which is ruled by a king or queen, was the primary system throughout the world. These monarchies were terrible and eventually the citizens rebelled and overthrough the system. After putting an end to feudalism, the people were in need of a new system. During the 1700’s utopian ideolgies such as capitalism, communism, and socialism emerged. These three systems help society greatly and helped strengthen governments until the late 1900’s.…

    • 187 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marxism focuses on the inequality that exists in capitalist society and suggests ways that this inequality can be overcome (i.e. through evolution). It also suggests alternatives to the capitalist system.…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Using material from Item A and elsewhere assess the contribution of Marxism to our understanding of the role of education.…

    • 1665 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marxism shares in common with functionalism the macro structural approach to society, looking at it as a whole, however a key difference between the two theories is that marxism is a conflict perspective, that is the conflict of class between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat also known as the ruling and working classes. The work of Karl Marx in the mid 1800s constitutes the main body of this conflict theory, he wrote that the central institution of capitalist society is private property, the system by which capital (money, machines, factories and other material objects) is controlled by a small minority of the population, leading to opposed classes i.e. the bourgeoisie and the proletariat (Cohen 1978). Marxists believe that society is based on ascribed status which is given by birth or family background, therefore the bourgeoisie pass down their land and properties to their children, keeping the wealth in the…

    • 2075 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays