Preview

Assess The Arguments In Favour Of Parliament In The Uk

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3353 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Assess The Arguments In Favour Of Parliament In The Uk
‘In the United Kingdom Parliament is supreme in all legislative matters; a written constitution could never be introduced because it would always be subject to express or implied amendment or repeal’

‘Parliament is the only body which can make laws in the United Kingdom (UK), and is therefore sovereign. No other authority can over-rule or change the laws which parliament has made. Political commentators often say that parliament can do "what the hell it likes" in terms of law making. This by and large means that the government of the day can pass legislation easily through parliament as long it has a strong, supportive majority in the House of Commons.’ So if, for example, Parliament had passed a law stating that all newborn boys had to be killed, or that all dog owners had to keep a cat as well, there might well be an enormous public outcry, but the law would still be valid and the court would, in theory at least, be obliged to uphold them. The reasoning behind this is that the Parliament, unlike the judiciary, is democratically elected, and therefore ought to have the upper hand when making the laws that every citizen has to live by.
‘The United Kingdom does not have a codified (written) constitution, unlike France or the United States, and this has a …show more content…
The Preamble to the Parliament Act 1911 removed the House of Lord’s power to veto legislation passed by the House of Commons, and since thereafter there has been no constitutional mechanism by which the House of Common’s supremacy can be
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Assess the strengths of the UK constitution (25 marks)
    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Assess the strengths of the UK constitution (25 marks)

    One strength of the UK constitution is the flexibility that it has, for the reason that the constitution is uncodified or unwritten and is therefore not entrenched in law. Due to the fact that the UK’s constitution is uncodified or unwritten, it has an opportunity to modernise itself to the ever changing society or any other new circumstances that may arise. An example of the flexibility of the UK’s constitution is the recent implementation of the Same Sex Marriages Act (2013). This was brought in due to the number of LGBT people that wanted to get married, but, because of the current laws that were in place, could not. This shows one of the ways in which the constitution does modernise itself in terms of society. However, the flexibility that is expressed by the fact that it is unwritten may in fact be manipulated if the ability to change the constitution were to “fall into the wrong hands”. For example, if somebody completely left wing or completely right were to come into power, they could effectively manipulate the system and change the constitution to suit them and their supporters. While this argument is an effective argument, it is doubtful that the government of today will allow a person, hypothetically with close-minded views such as these, to be put in any place of power. Overall, today’s government, in terms of flexibility does not stand a high risk of being manipulated, as there are appropriate measures in place to stop this from happening.…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The case for Britain retaining its uncodified constitution remains extremely strong
    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The case for Britain retaining its uncodified constitution remains extremely strong

    The British constitution itself is flexible as it allows the constitutions to evolve and generally adapt to the changing society. Compared to the US whose constitution is described as ‘rigid’; through the struggle of being able to amend constitutions; for example, the ‘right to bear arms’ amendment, which basically gives registered citizens the right to keep and bear arms (weapons). The topic of amending this constitution is very controversial, however due to the constitution being codified the process is very difficult, as is it entrenched and has been a part of the US culture for centuries.…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    ‘the Absence of a Written Constitution ... Enables Constitutional Change to Be Brought About Within the United Kingdom with the Minimum of Constitutional Formality.’
    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages

    ‘the Absence of a Written Constitution ... Enables Constitutional Change to Be Brought About Within the United Kingdom with the Minimum of Constitutional Formality.’

    (2) No other person or body can change or repeal legislation which Parliament as enacted…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Assess The Effectiveness Of Law Making Through Parliament
    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Assess The Effectiveness Of Law Making Through Parliament

    The parliament makes laws in future. Which means they think ahead of what the world’s developing to and thinks of what new laws will be needed for society once this is done it allows society to know what the law is and how it will apply to them.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    To What Extent Does the Parliament Hold the Executive to Account?
    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages

    To What Extent Does the Parliament Hold the Executive to Account?

    Parliament does not govern, but its role is to check or constrain the government of the day. Many therefore argue that parliament’s most important function is to ‘call the government to account’’, there by forcing the members to explain their actions and justify their policies. There are three groups within the UK parliament, the House of Commons, the House of Lords, and the Monarchy. The HoC consists of 646 MP’s and each MP is elected in a local constituency to gain a seat in parliament. The House of Lords consists of 721 peers, there are approximately 600 life peers where as there are only 92 hereditary peers. The Lords spiritual are the second smallest group of the Lords. They are bishops and archbishops of the Church of England, and now only 26 remain. Law lords are the final group to make up the House of Lords. There are only 12 of these, and they focus on judicial work, which is carried out through the Appellate Committee of the House of Lords. The final group that can hold the government to account is the monarchy. The monarch is often ignored as part of parliament, which is understandable as the Queen is normally entirely ceremonial and symbolic. As a non-executive head of state, the monarchy symbolizes the authority of the crown. Parliament holds the government to account by scrutinising and overseeing what the government does, and this is the key to ensure a responsible government.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Upper House Case Study
    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Upper House Case Study

    Question one asks if it is within the power of the Parliament to repeal or amend sections 21 to 36 of the British North America Act, 1867, to remove any reference to an Upper House or the Senate. The second question ask if it is within the authority of the Parliament to enact law that would alter any of a list of characteristics of the existing Upper House. The list of possibly amendable areas included, (a) changing the name; (b) changing the numbers and proportions of members; (c) changing qualifications required; (d) changing the tenure of members; (e) changing the method of selection, including options such as allowing the provinces to choose or direct election; (f) to allow bills to be approved after the approval of the House of Commons, even if they were not approved by the Upper House, after a period of time (p.…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    To what extent has British constitution been effectively reformed since 1997
    • 842 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To what extent has British constitution been effectively reformed since 1997

    Modernization is one of the key ways in which the British constitution has been reformed since 1997. Under this falls the House of Lords reform. This reform entailed the 600 hereditary peers of the House of Lords being cut to just 92, allowing the second chamber to be much more democratic. However this is the only part of the reform which has taken place over the last 13 years, and there has been no reform for a fully elected second house – something that would be extremely beneficial to British politics. Until an elected House of Lords is achieved, the second chamber is not democratically legitimate, as the people or representative does not appoint it. Due to this, many consider the House of Lords extremely unaccountable and a massive flaw in Parliament. However, the creation of the Supreme Court means that the House of Lords is no longer the highest court of appeal, meaning that the currently unelected House of Lords is not as much of a problem. A way in which modernization has been effective is in reforms to the way the House of Commons is run; the increase in use of Westminster Hall for debates, the publication of bills two weeks in advance to increase scrutiny and the changes to Prime Minister’s Question Time. The latter reforms have in fact strengthened the UK constitution, in contrast to the reform to the House of Lords, which was essentially ineffective.…

    • 842 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Well Does Parliament Perform Its Various Functions?
    • 1529 Words
    • 7 Pages

    How Well Does Parliament Perform Its Various Functions?

    Parliament is designed to hold the executive accountable; therefore it goes about this by various means of government scrutiny, such as Prime Minister’s Question Time. In addition, Parliament is expected to perform a legislative function, creating the process of a bill becoming a law after undergoing many stages between the House of Commons and the House of Lords. Finally, Parliament is also required to be representative of the nation, with constituencies creating a strong local link between the electorate and their MP.…

    • 1529 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The UK Constitution is no Longer Fit For Purpose. Discuss.
    • 1184 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The UK Constitution is no Longer Fit For Purpose. Discuss.

    due to its uncodified nature. Some see the UK constitution being uncodified as a weakness, where…

    • 1184 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    To What Extent Is Parliament an Effective Constraint on the Executive?
    • 1614 Words
    • 7 Pages

    To What Extent Is Parliament an Effective Constraint on the Executive?

    The first means available to parliament in scrutinizing the government is the debating and ratification functions of the House of Lords. After a bill has been proposed by the House of Commons, it is sent to the House of Lords for intense debate and discussion. After this has happened the House of Lords can pass the bill reject the bill absolutely or send the bill back to the House of Commons for amendment in its current state. However since the passing of the of the Parliament Act in 1997 the House of Lords has the powers only to delay the passing of legislation for 1 year until which point the legislation must be passed. Therefore it could be argued that the House of Lords does not act as a successful check on legislation initiated by government, as it has only the power to suggest amendments to bills and lacks the legal jurisdiction to enforce amendments to bills. One of the clearest and most commonly used examples of a way in which parliament acts as a limiting factor to the powers exerted by government exists as the size of the government’s parliamentary majority. Strong governments with large majorities such as those of…

    • 1614 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Parliament A Constitutional Relic
    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Why Is Parliament A Constitutional Relic

    Parliament is the supreme law-making body in the UK. This means that there are no constitutional restrains on legislative powers. This also includes the fact that courts are under an obligation to give effect to legislation passed by Parliament and not question statutes. Most importantly, Parliamentary Sovereignty is not a constitutional relic. This is simply because UK courts cannot strike down Act of Parliament. First assertion of Dicey is that Parliament’s legislative competence is unlimited. This was shown in Mortensen v Peters (1906). In this case, it was held that parliament is supreme over international law and UK courts felt bound to apply the UK Act, even though it was in contravention of international law. Another case that illustrates…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    influences on parliament
    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages

    influences on parliament

    Some legislation is passed as a response to pressure from the European Union of the European Court of Human Rights. The UK signed up to the European Convention on Human Rights in 1950 and the Treaty Establishing the Community (the Treaty of Rome) in 1972. This meant that we would have to accept pressures from Europe to pass certain laws when they arose. When an EU directive is issued the government must ensure that it is implemented in English law. Sometimes our law is sufficient and no change is needed. Sometimes it is best to make the necessary changes from primary legislation. In this case a bill must be…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    ‘the Constitution Is No Longer Fit for Purpose’
    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages

    ‘the Constitution Is No Longer Fit for Purpose’

    A constitution is a set of rules that seeks to establish the duties, powers and functions of the various institutions of government. The constitution creates limited government so the government is checked and restrained therefore providing protection for the individual and their rights. the UK constitution is uncodified, which means that it is not all written down in one document therefore entrenched creating a higher law like that of America; it is split into several different locations, statute law, common law, conventions, works of constitutional authority and EU law and treaties. This means that the UK constitution is not entrenched or codified and sources such as common law and convention are not written down but are traditions and customs, the way government has always done things. The constitution is fit for purpose as it worked during the 2010 election when the outcome saw no overall winner and a coalition was created, it allowed for this to be done in just 5 days where as a codified constitution would have been much more ridged and have taken longer to work around or amend.…

    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    House of Commons Effectiveness
    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages

    House of Commons Effectiveness

    The House of Commons can be seen to be effective in the cases where it has defied the government. Although this happens infrequently there have been cases where Commons has voted against government. A Good example of this is when Blair’s plans to extend the detention of terrorist suspects to 90 days were blocked.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How Are Civil Liberties Better Protected Since 1997
    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How Are Civil Liberties Better Protected Since 1997

    In comparison to countries such as France and the USA, the UK’s commitment to civil liberties was weak. During the US declaration of civil Independence the US made amendments to its constitution,; their bill of rights became largely made up of civil liberties, including the right to freedom of religion, speech etc. And the French Revolution led to the establishment of the Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen (1789). Whereas, the UK has traditionally been reluctant to give basic rights and freedoms explicit legal expression. Instead, it relied on the freedoms that were supposed to be embodied in the common Law belief that ‘everything is permitted that is not prohibited’. However, in recent years, the protection of civil liberties has increasingly fallen to the courts, due to the wider use of the power of judicial review and the introduction of the Human Rights Act.…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics