Top-Rated Free Essay

Assess the moral arguments and political actions of those opposed to the spread of slavery in the context of two of the following

Good Essays
Assess the moral arguments and political actions of those opposed to the spread of slavery in the context of two of the following:

The Missouri Compromise

The Mexican War

Compromise Of 1850

Kansas-Nebraska Act

The moral and political actions of those opposed to the spread of slavery in the context of The Mexican War and The Kansas-Nebraska Act are very conflicting. With the upset in balance of the Mexican War, antislavery activists were upset about any potential compromise while with the Kansas-Nebraska act, they settled with the idea of them being in a state of popular sovereignty.

The acquisitions of the Mexican War triggered an upset in the balance of free and slave states. The solution of extending the Missouri Compromise line of 3630' angered both proslavery and antislavery activists. It upset the proslavery activists because it conceded that Congress could bar slavery in some territories. It angered the antislavery activists because it would allow slavery in New Mexico and southern California. The issue was further aggravated by the acceptance of Texas as a slave state and it claming the eastern half of New Mexico, where slavery had since been outlawed.

The Kansas-Nebraska Act reflected the actions of those opposed to slavery by declaring the territories as a state of popular sovereignty, or slavery by the discretion of the territory. The issue that lay within the proposed bill was that Nebraska lay within the Louisiana Purchase and north of the Missouri compromise line of 3630', a region closed to slavery. Unless concessions were made, southerners would have little incentive to vote for this bill. The organization of Nebraska would simultaneously create a potential free state and further upset southerners due to the increase in chances for a northern rather than a southern railroad to the Pacific. The ideal concession to appease the south was to point out that the Compromise of 1850 had applied the principals of popular sovereignty to the New Mexico and Utah, territories outside the Louisiana Purchase and hence unaffected by the Missouri Compromise thus proposing that the Compromise of 1850 had taken the place of the Missouri Compromise everywhere. The concession was widely attacked by southern congressmen and the bill was viewed as a plot to turn the territory into a "dreary region of the despotism, inhabited by masters and slaves." These attacks by antislavery northerners united the south by turning the bill into an issue of sectional pride as well as slavery expansion.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    By this time, so many more Northerners had become opposed, morally, to slavery and had spoken out against. Many people were opposed to slavery because the white families had a very hard time competing against the inexpensive labor of the slaves and could not rise above to grasp what everyone wanted, the American dream. When the Kansas-Nebraska Act was put into place in the hopes that popular choice would make Kansas a slave state and Nebraska a free state which would maintain balance and would also organize even more territory coming in from the Louisiana Purchase in order to further the railroad construction. This conflict instigated dramatic change in addition to the change created by negating the Missouri Compromise Line. Because it repealed the Missouri Compromise in which slavery was not to expand north of the 36’30 line and also because many in Kansas were thoroughly against slavery, both morally, and for their financial well-being which led to the event known as Bleeding Kansas where bloodshed had become evident over the dispute, this change also involved the end of peaceful compromise. Those opposed to the spread of slavery like John Brown went to Kansas and killed pro-slavery Southerners. Those who thought the political strategy of popular sovereignty would maintain balance were proved wrong when the territory became chaotic.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Causes of the Civil War

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The issue on slavery was one of the causes of the Civil War. Slavery and slave trades had become a big part of the South’s economy. During the 19th Century, the North worked hard on abolishing slavery, which they thought was a disgrace to the Union. Compromises were proposed working toward an end to slavery. One of the compromises was the Missouri Compromise, which made Maine, a free state, and Missouri, a slave state, and everything above the 36° 30 north latitude free. Other compromises such as the Compromise of 1850 did please both sides. The Compromise included admitting California as a free state and interstate slave trade to be abolished which went in favor of the North. The Compromise also went with the South when it included stricter fugitive slave laws in document 7, the Kansas Nebraska Act, made it possible for new states to decide if they were going to be free, or slave states. The North and the South were far from settling the slave issue.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bleeding Kansas

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 set the scene by allowing the new territories of Kansas and Nebraska to decide by popular sovereignty, an idea advocated by US Senator Stephan A. Douglas, if they would be free or slave states. The government assumed that few slave owners would attempt to settle in Kansas and make it a slave state, because it was thought to be too far north for profitable exploitation of slaves. Instead, it resulted in immigration to Kansas by activists from both sides, which began the bloody wars of slavery which lasted from 1854 to 1858.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    sample orr and ozark mo

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages

    During the elections of 1860, the United States was divided by decisions concerning slavery. The Missouri territory came to the United States as part of the 1803 Louisiana Purchase. The House of Representatives put forward an amendment to the admission of Missouri that would prohibit the introduction of slaves into Missouri and freeing the children of slaves at the age of 25. The Senate passed the bill admitting Missouri without the amendment, but it was rejected by the House, pushing the controversy into 1820. The Great Compromiser, Henry Clay, proposed the following elements of a sectional compromise: That Missouri be admitted to the Union as a slave state (as the population of the territory apparently desired).That slavery was to be prohibited from the new American territories in the Louisiana Purchase north of 36/30’ north latitude (the southern boundary of Missouri). States to the south of the line (the new Arkansas Territory) would decide the slavery issue for themselves. Missouri became the 24th state on August 10, 1821. The Missouri Compromise was canceled in 1854 with the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    2012 Apush 40 Essays

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages

    3. Analyze the ways in which supporters of slavery in the nineteenth century used legal, religious, and economic arguments to defend the institution of slavery…

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, the Missouri Compromise of 1820 established the slavery line that allowed slavery below it and forbid slavery above it. It also gave the South another slave state in Missouri and the north a free state in Maine. Although each region gained a state in the Senate, the south benefited most from the acquisition because Missouri was in such a pivotal position in the country, right on the border. Later on with the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854, Missouri had a big role in getting Kansas to vote south because many proslavery Missourians crossed the border into Kansas to vote slavery. The Missouri Compromise also helped slavery because the line that was formed to limit slavery had more land below the line than above it. Therefore, slavery was given more land to be slave and therefore more power in the Senate, when the territories became state. In effect, the north got the short end of the stick and the south was given the first hint of being able to push around the north. The interesting thing is, the north agreed to all these provisions that would clearly benefit the south.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Sectionalism

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 1850 the law was passed with a strict interpretation, if a runaway slave escapes to a Northern state, they can be captured, and be returned to their Southern owners. Southerners were beyond happy with his new law, mostly because these cases were put under the jurisdiction of the federal government, so Northerners had to oblige to the law. Also, if a free African American is captured they were denied the right of trial by jury, so any African American could be put into slavery. Northerners felt they were useless, due to they could not do anything about Southerners traveling to free states to capture African Americans, so slavery contributed to further dividing the Nation into two. In hopes of Southerners seeing the wrongs of slavery, Harriet Beecher Stowe, a Northerner, wrote Uncle Tom’s Cabin. A fictional story that follows the life of a slave named Tom, showing the horrors of some slave owners and what slaves dealt with in their lifetime. Northerners were impressed and pleased with Stowe’s story, but Southerners were horrified by the writing thought it was vicious propaganda. North and South not seeing eye to eye on the issue of slavery, only brought more sectionalism to the Nation. Slavery issues continue into 1854 with the Kansas-Nebraska Act, Stephen A. Douglas introduced a bill in hopes of expanding slavery, that would split the Nebraska territory into two, the Nebraska Territory and Kansas territory, and allow the settlers to decide whether slavery is permitted or not, also known as popular sovereignty. Northerners saw this as giving into slavery, ironically President Pierce signs the bill into a law. An event occurred because of the signing, Bleeding Kansas, “Border Ruffians” arrived from Missouri in hopes of winning Kansas for the South and antislavery farmers from the Midwest migrated hoping for a free state. Soon enough fighting broke out between the two groups,…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Missouri Compromise, one of the most known agreements in American history, was an attempt presented by Henry Clay in calming sectional division between the Northern and Southern states over the issue of slavery. While the Missouri Compromise found a temporary solution in regards to representation resulting in twelve free states and twelve slave states(G), it also, however, ignited the strong feelings, opinions, and justifications of two opposing sides and "heralded" the future unsuccess of the Union. No longer could our forefathers postpone such an imminent issue as was done during the infancy of the United States government. The Missouri Compromise was a success in a sense, not merely because of its contents, but rather because it caused people to voice their angered opinions about slavery, unavoidably causing the government to realize the importance of finding a genuine solution to the reality of slavery if the future of America was to survive and truly be united.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Kansas-Nebrask Act was an 1854 a bill that mandated "popular sovereignty" -giving settlers the choice to decide whether slavery would be allowed or not. Making each state a pro-slavery state or an anti-slavery state. The pro-slavery and anti-slavery states later caused huge peridos of viloence in the time line like the Bleeding Kansas, and was a major part in the reason the…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1850's Dbq

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Mexican War was one of the most influential events that contributed the increasing separation of the union. Much conflict arose on whether Texas and California should be free or slave states. One of the men who tried to resolve this conflict was Henry Clay. Along with Stephen Douglas, he drafted what came to be known as the Compromise of 1850. It declared California a free state, abolished the slave trade in D.C, gained the New Mexico territory (which was to be organized through popular sovereignty), rearranged the Texas boundary, and passed the Fugitive Slave Law. Although it seemed like a good plan, it had flaws, which disappointed and angered many people. The people of Texas were angered because, a large portion of their land had been taken for New Mexico (Document A). It seemed that what angered one group, made the other happy. This was all because of the growing disunity over the ridiculous question of slavery.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act

    • 833 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Kansas-Nebraska Bill showed a fallacy in the Compromise of 1850's ideal of popular sovereignty. Popular sovereignty had given each territory the right to chose whether or not it would allow slavery. The problem was that Kansas and Nebraska lay within the land acquired under the Louisiana Purchase. Under the Missouri Compromise, slavery had been forbidden in all territories in the Louisiana purchase- from latitude 36°30' north to the order with Canada. Southern politicians demanded that the 36°30' law be removed. With a slight notion of the consequences of such an action, Douglas included it in is bill, which was passed in May of 1854.…

    • 833 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The debate over slavery arose again after the Mexican-American War, when Congress had to decide the status of new territory acquired from Mexico. Although the Constitution gave Congress no ability to rid the nation of slavery, it allowed for Congress to determine the qualification future state's admission. This made it possible for a majority of either section to manipulate a new state's status through making the abolition or the protection of slavery necessary for the state to become organized. An earlier compromise in 1820, was the result of a struggle for sectional control over the status of Missouri. Congress choose to appease both sides by admitting Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state. The compromise created a westward line dividing the…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the major exports of the south is cotton, and while the north invested in factories and railroads, they invested in slaves to tend to their crops. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 stated that all territories about the 36’30 line must enter as free states, and all territories below must enter as slave. They also enter as pairs, one free/one slave, to keep balance. Many inventions, such as the Cotton Gin, led to an increased need for slaves. All the while, the North was moving away from slavery for both moral and economic reasons. Popular Sovereignty allowed citizens of each new territory to vote and decide if their area would be slave or free.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Compromises

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act is when a lot of the contentment on both sides began to fall apart. Senator Stephen A. Douglas, responsible for passing the Compromise of 1850, wanted a railroad running west through Chicago. The problem…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    While there had already been tension building between the North and the South, the addition of new territory added new fuel to the fire. If the new states that emerged from the Louisiana Territory were all free, then the balance of power in the U.S. Senate would tilt decisively against slavery or vice versa . From the moment that the expansion of the United States emerged, there was conflict. Eventually after many years of debate the Missouri Compromise came to be in 1820. The Missouri Compromise was devised by Henry Clay . It was an attempt to defuse the tension causes by the addition of the Louisiana Purchase. It gave the pre-slavers the decisive state they needed to hold their position in congress. After much debate was had about which states would be free or slave states with the addition of the Louisiana Purchase, a compromise was worked out. To appease both sides Missouri would be admitted as a slave state and Maine (which used to be apart Massachusetts) would have the status of a free state, and minus Missouri, slavery was to be excluded at a certain latitude . With the Missouri Compromise; all states south of Missouri would be slave states and all states north of it would be free. The addition of Missouri as a slave state just ignited the already hot debate about the legitimacy of slavery. While the Louisiana Purchase would eventually help to…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays