Preview

“As a comedy double act, what they do is more engaging than what they say”. To what extent do you agree with this view of the dramatic function of Vladimir and Estragon in Waiting for Godot?

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1574 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
“As a comedy double act, what they do is more engaging than what they say”. To what extent do you agree with this view of the dramatic function of Vladimir and Estragon in Waiting for Godot?
The fragmented, repetitive and obscure use of dialogue by the two derelict protagonists, Vladimir and Estragon, in Beckett’s existentialist drama, ‘Waiting for Godot’ is often not deemed as significant or as engaging as the action of the protagonists within this comedic play. As such, it becomes clear throughout the play that the repetitive action engages the audience through frustration due to its inconclusive and relentless nature that contributes to the meaninglessness of the play. This offers the conclusion that in fact, what they say and what they do are not in competition for significance, but are in fact dependently linked- one cannot exist without the other.

The desolation and isolation of setting, deeply black and existentialist dialogue and non-progressive plot within Waiting for Godot provokes the audience to use the comic action of the characters as a relief. The amusement of the audience can be the result of a feeling of superiority to Vladimir and Estragon as their action portrays them as depressed, lonely and bored, ‘Let’s hang ourselves immediately! ’The incongruous hellish landscape, accents and bowler hats are also the source of much entertainment for an audience who are usually at the higher end of the hierarchy of social classes. The demolishment of individualism within the characters allows Beckett to represent them as the exemplification of modern man and humanity as a whole, ‘Let’s contradict each other’. This intention of Beckett’s itself engages the audience as they deduce what Beckett notions are regarding society.

Beckett’s compelling play lies firmly within the genre of the irrational and illogical Absurdist theatre, or ‘theatre stripped bare’, through his lack of pre-destined role, lack of conflict and unorthodox action. This blackly humorous lack of substance within Beckett’s Absurdist drama evokes thought in the audience regarding their own situation and allows them to make comparisons between their lives and the lives of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    A short play is usually filled with a theatrical energy of diverse anthologies. The time allotted may be only ten or fifteen minutes, so it must be able to capture and engage the audience with some dramatic tension, exciting action, or witty humor. Just as in a short story, a great deal of the explanation and background is left for the reader or viewer to discover on their own. Because all the details are not explicitly stated, each viewer interprets the action in their own way and each experience is unique from someone else viewing the same play. Conflict is the main aspect that drives any work of literature, and plays usually consist of some form of conflict. In “Playwriting 101: The Rooftop Lesson,” Rich Orloff explores these common elements of plays and creates an original by “gathering all clichés into one story and satirizing them” (Orloff as cited by Meyer, 2009, p. 1352).…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    cyrano essay

    • 318 Words
    • 1 Page

    In this piece of literature Cyrano De Bergerac by Edmond Rostand exibits the plethora of ways dramatic irony has occured throughout the novel. Whenever the irony is demonstrated in the parts of a play, it applies a playful and entertaing toneto the play. We can see this occur many times in the play.…

    • 318 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After spending time listening and participating in my class’s interactive oral for Cyrano de Bergerac, my mind and thought process towards this play were expanded. I never realized how pyrotechnic Rostand’s writing truly is. This play contains so many symbols that allows the reader to connect with the story on a deeper level. The interactive oral gave me a chance to notice the little symbolisms that most people overlook, such as, a barrier that prevents Cyrano from professing his love to his cousin Roxane, meant to be shown through Cyrano’s rather large nose. There was also a realization about the differences and similarities of the culture depicted then and the culture now. The stereotypical gender roles seemed to be switched in the play then what…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare's 'Hamlet' remains at the pinnacle of high culture texts and the cannon as one of the most iconic texts in the modern world. 'Hamlet' is a deeply philosophical in which grapples with metaphysical questions- existential in nature that underpins the human ethos. It is through the highly charged language, textual integrity and use of meta-theatrical techniques that ensure the play's modernity and continuing resonance in society through multiple perspectives.…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Any critical evaluation of the play “Hamlet” must be chiefly concerned with the character of Hamlet. Unlike Shakespeare’s other tragedies, “Hamlet” is singular in purpose and scope-it is the story of one man’s personal and moral collapse under the weight of his own (and other’s) decisions, intentions and machinations. The play is not complicated with subplots and extraneous secondary characters, but is wholly focused on the man himself. This dedication to a singular dramatic intention paradoxically makes for “Hamlet” to be, subjectively, Shakespeare most confusing play. It is problematic in its protagonists’ inscrutability, his missing motives, his contradictory actions, and his utter implacability to settle into one stable character. Almost everything he does further contradicts him as an individual in the world of the play and as a dramatic character. For this reason my critical evaluation of the play is that it is artistically self defeating due to its own subversions of character and dramatic convention, and this should render it unfulfilling and disappointing as a dramatic performance. Paradoxically, the plays confusion renders it all the more infuriatingly readable-it is both alienating and enticing, a work which defeats itself in its own realisation and at the same time is only worthwhile and meaningful in this artistic enigma-the individual components should not work, yet it does strike a powerful emotional and dramatic resonance in its completion. Many aspects of “Hamlet” as a text are easily criticised-it is certainly a work with a large amount of problems. However, in a rather subversive and mysterious manner the play is a wonderful work of literature.…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this introduction to the play Stephan Greenblatt directly emphasises not only the depth but also the mystery about the main character of Hamlet. He points at the different impressions Hamlet makes on his co-characters and the spectator can only refer to these onstage interactions. A diverse character like Hamlet therefore leaves much space for interpretation.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare’s employment of dramatic struggle and disillusionment through his character Hamlet, contributes to the continued engagement of modern audiences. The employment of the soliloquy demonstrates Shakespeare’s approach to the dramatic treatment of these emotions. The soliloquy brings a compensating intimacy, and becomes the means by which Shakespeare brings the audience not only to a knowledge of secret thoughts of characters, but into the closest emotional touch with them too. Through this, the audiences therefore gain a closer relationship with Hamlet, and are absorbed by him because they are able to resonate with his circumstances, as he is faced with enduring truths of the human condition. Through these, the struggle and disillusionment of life, the world, women and himself are identified.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They agree on most topics among these ramblings, but never stop to realize that inconsistency of their ideas. In a way the play is thoughtless, but extremely flexible within its themes. By the end of the play there is not much gratification and transformation at all, there is consistency. The consistency of thoughts, often incoherent ones, but thoughts none the less that express life, whether it's far too convoluted or not. This play reminds us of an Albee play, or possibly even one of Beckett's work. There is an eyre of mystery within these words and the cracks are not filled by such. It presents the audience with ideas, most unconnected or incompressible. There is no doubt that this is a play of theory, not of…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Given this critical confusion, we might as well admit up front that we are not going to arrive at anything like a firm consensus on what the play is about and how we should understand it. However, wrestling with this play is a very important and stimulating exercise, because it puts a lot of pressure on us to reach some final interpretation (that is, it generates in us a desire to make sense of all the elements in it, to find some closure), and, even if that goal eludes us, we can learn a great deal about reading poetic drama and interpreting literature from a serious attempt to grasp this most elusive work. If one of the really important functions of great literature is to stimulate thought-provoking conversations which force us to come to grips with many things about the text and about ourselves, then Hamlet is a particularly valuable work.…

    • 12004 Words
    • 49 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hamlet is generally regarded as Shakespeare’s magnum opus, sometimes it is even referred as the highest literary product of human genius. Critics have always been argued on the interpretation of Hamlet and even after more than 400 years, yet these argues still going strong. One of the most controversial that topic for critics since the beginning is the interpretation of the third act of Hamlet, where many critics themselves baffle because normal interpretations will make Hamlet subsequent actions irrational and impossible to explain. Many will use insanity to explain Hamlet actions. However, we will presume that Hamlet is staying sane throughout the course of the story. This paper is an attempt at interpreting the purpose and significant of…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A text of timeless appeal is marked by effective construction of characters to support its main ideas. How is your personal response to Hamlet shaped by the interaction of these characters?…

    • 726 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tom Stoppard's Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead, a humorous piece of self-reflexive theater that draws upon Shakespeare's Hamlet as the source of the story. The actual device of self-reflexive theater is used so well in Stoppard's play that it reads like the love child of a play and a compelling critical essay. The play is academic yet conversationally phrased and it deepens our understanding of the original play but also criticizes it. The aspect of self-reflexive theater is used to comment on theater itself but also as a presentation of ideas and analysis that had previously had no place on the plot-centric set-up of stage and audience.…

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In reading Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead, by Tom Stoppard, and Waiting for Godot, by Samuel Beckett, one can see several dissimilarities between the main characters in each play. In Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are the two main characters who have been summoned to complete a mission for the king. The characters in Waiting for Godot, Vladimir and Estragon, also are on a mission. Both plays revolve around the men and their relationships with each other as time passes and they attempt to accomplish their goals.…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Romeo and Juliet Essay

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Throughout this essay I will analyse characterisation, stagecraft, language and context when exploring the themes of the play and when considering what the audience learns as a result.…

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “I can’t go on like this”, with this last phrase Waiting for Godot ends. Although it might not seem a lot by itself, when reading the whole play it is possibly to understand about what is the character of Estragon talking about. He and Vladimir have been waiting for a person called Godot to come and meet them, and as the first act of the play shows they have been waiting for a while and they pretend to keep waiting for him, even if he does not shows up for days. This play is strongly based in the repetition of their routine and patterns of each one of them.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays