Preview

Arms Control Disarmament And Nuclear Non Proliferation

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1497 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Arms Control Disarmament And Nuclear Non Proliferation
Nuclear Pakistan: Arms Control and Disarmament
And Nuclear Non-Proliferation
Arms and weapons are considered to be essential for the security of the country. The basic aim of any country is security and survival and to serve security and survival, tools are required which are capacity and capability to build your weapons for defence. Arms and Weapons are used for two things aggression and defence which is dependent upon the policy of the country. Thomas Hobbes said, “Humans are by nature Brutish, Nasty and violent”, So weapons in the hands of human beings who are brutish, nasty and violent can’t be guaranteed and that means devastation and war.
Arms control and disarmament and nuclear non-proliferation are relevant concepts to each other. The only objective is the survival of the humanity, to reduce the atrocities, war and to maintain peace. Arms control and Disarmament are the major aspects of the international politics today. If we see back last 10 years, the agenda of disarmament includes different concepts and different dimensions;
1) Reducing the chances of war and stabilizing the chances of prosperity.
2) Maintaining and expanding non-proliferation regimes that restrain the spread of nuclear weapons.
3) Constraining the spread of long range cruise missiles.
4) Banning chemical and biological weapons.
5) Restricting the size and composition of the conventional arms.
6) Creating regional confidence building measures and banning certain classes of non-nuclear arms like landmines.
These are the basic objectives of disarmament and nuclear non-proliferation regimes. The international powers like; America, Russia, China their national security policy revolves around that and for that purpose even during the cold war period they had started START (Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty) and even CWCs (Chemical Weapons Conventions) and throughout the cold war most of the treaties were initiated bi-lateral and then they converted to multi-lateral. The realists have the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    U.S World History 05.06

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Despite the fall of the Soviet Union 19 years ago in 1991, the issue of nuclear arms, besides terrorism, remains one of the chief security concerns in the contemporary world. Accordingly, the following issues concerning nuclear arms remained unresolved security concerns.Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. These events not only brought about the surrender of the Japan and an end to World War II, but they also helped shaped the nature of international politics for the next six decades.The atomic bomb is the crudest form of a series of powerful nuclear weapons to be eventually developed and come into existence. Both superpowers, the United States of America and the Soviet Union, eventually built massive stockpiles of nuclear weapons during the Cold War. This escalation of nuclear arms possession led to…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Comparison of the 1938 Munich Crisis and 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis and the Role of Nuclear Arms…

    • 2601 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scare

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In addition to the reduction in weapons, the number of countries which were developing, had developed or were seriously discussing nuclear programs has dropped since the 1980’s. This was due to a combination of factors that still determine such decisions today, including security, expense, need for status or prestige, internal politics and other factors.…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pf con case

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Subpoint A – Nuclear proliferation is an action fueled by fear and if there is increase in military force interference, that fear will be legitimized. According to the article “Why Countries Build Nuclear Weapons in the 21st Century” by Zachary Keck, “Iran’s nuclear program is better explained, then, by the rise in the potential conventional threat the U.S. poses to the Iran.” As many countries are, Iran was obviously intimidated by the massive military force of the U.S. and made the decision to begin proliferating nuclear weapons. And if the U.S. uses military force as an act to prevent nuclear proliferation, that goal may not be fulfilled.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Tonight, consistent with our obligations of the ABM treaty and recognizing the need for closer consultation with our allies, I'm taking an important first step. I am directing a comprehensive and intensive effort to define a long-term research and development program to begin to achieve our ultimate goal of eliminating the threat posed by strategic nuclear missiles. This could pave the way for arms control measures to eliminate the weapons themselves. We seek neither military superiority nor political advantage. Our only purpose--one all people share--is to search for ways to reduce the danger of nuclear…

    • 5226 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Guns are I the military and they help us win wars, without guns or bombs we wouldn’t be able to protect ourselves. And we can use guns to protect use from criminals and intruders…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lettow, Paul Vorbeck. 2010 Strengthening the nuclear nonproliferation regime. New York Council on forgein Relations. Print…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A fundamental component of the proliferation debate revolves around the perceived or alleged efficiency of nuclear deterrence. Proliferation optimists argue that, “more may be better” because nuclear weapons increase the cost of nuclear conflict, ultimately deterring states from engaging in nuclear warfare with a nuclear-armed state (Suzuki 2015). Optimists argue that nuclear deterrence works reliably, thus there seemingly less to be feared from nuclear proliferation and beneficial to a state to…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the second amendment was made, giving us the right to bear arms, the founding fathers wanted the people to have equal arms to the army, they wanted us to be able to fight off our own military. This is because they never wanted America’s government to become tyrannical over it’s people. They wanted A fail-safe so that if the government tried to take away the rights of the people, the people could fight back if left no other option. Throughout history there have been nations whose people were not armed because they did not fear their own government, only to be trun on and wiped out. The most notorious even of this nature was when the Nazi party disarmed the Jewish population giving then no way of fighting back, before throwing them into death camps. Our right to bear arms form a barrier between us and the greed and oppressions of any government. “The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles.” ― Jeff Cooper, Art of the Rifle, Cooper Enforces that evil people or tyrants can and will be stopped if the militia of the people is well armed, but that the people of the militia must still have an eye for freedom. In times of peace this freedom sits dormant, but the knowledge of their existence keeps any tyrannical movements far away from America. This is why the first thing all tyrants do is disarm the civilians and why we should never give up our right to bear…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For instance, the fear of a nuclear conflict that arose between the two superpowers after the event of the Cuban Missile Crisis. This led to one of the earliest agreements on nuclear arms control which included the Nuclear Test-Ban Treaty in 1963 (“Détente and Arms Control”). The formal agreements made between the two superpowers assured the security of the people against a possible nuclear attack which benefited both sides. Further negotiations continued with the Conference on Security and Cooperation. They emerged with an act that “recognized political borders, established military confidence building measures, created opportunities for trade and cultural exchange, and promoted human rights” (“Détente and Arms Control”). It presented both sides willingness to agree upon economic, and humanitarian solutions regarding the tensions between them. However, the era of Detente came to an unsatisfying halt. Public dissatisfaction and the continued competition increasingly manifested as they further intervene in the third World (“Détente and Arms Control”). It ended in a stalled progress on arms control and brought them back to the brink of confrontation. In conclusion, Detente was an event that showed vast improvements in the use of aid to create common…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Americans are named as firearm lovers of guns, and are thought to be utilizing guns as toys or as equipment during sports yet what individuals appear not to know is that these have an exceptionally incredible risk to the coming generations (Squires, 2012). Nations, for example, Mexico which run by drug cartels and high murder rates are less equipped than the United States. This brings up the issue in the matter of why Americans want to have more weapons than nations that are braced by war and high murder rates. The US government has put resources into an exceptionally solid civilian army and which is sufficiently capable of shielding Americans from both outside and inside attacks.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arms Limitations Talks

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The arms limitations talks played a big role in reducing tensions during the Cold war for example the United States and the USSR, helped relieve the public about an outbreak of a nuclear war and significantly reduced the number of nuclear weapons in the world.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Calls upon the UN to encourage the governments in the region, through different resolutions or reports, to formulate a clear long-term national strategy for complete disarmament;…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Waltz and Sagan

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages

    _ Not only do nukes deter attacks on the homeland, they deter attacks on any vital…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gun Control Agreements

    • 2827 Words
    • 12 Pages

    The NPT has three pillars: non-proliferation, disarmament and peaceful uses of nuclear energy (The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty). However, some countries that signed onto it have violated the treaty. For example in 1999, the United States stored weapons in 27 countries, which goes against Article I of the treaty, which states “not to transfer to any recipient whatsoever nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices.” The recipient countries that signed the treaty were considered non-nuclear weapon states and violated Article II, which prohibits them to receive any nuclear weapons. There has also been concern that the entire purpose of the NPT is to police the activities of its non-nuclear weapon member-states (Jayaprakash 43-45). Although there are flaws in both types of agreements, there are more WMD treaties that are successful. WMD pose more of a threat to nations, and countries are doing their best to destroy and prevent the use of these…

    • 2827 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays