Preview

Arizona vs Grant Case

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1824 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Arizona vs Grant Case
On August 25, 1999, acting on an anonymous tip that the residence at 2524 North Walnut Avenue was being used to sell drugs Tucson police officers Griffith and Reed knocked on the front door and asked to speak to the owner. Gant answered the door and, after identifying himself stated that he expected the owner to return later. The officers left the residence and conducted a records check, which revealed that Gant’s driver’s license had been suspended and there was an outstanding warrant for his arrest for driving with a suspended license. When the officers returned to the house that evening they found a man near the back of the house and a woman in a car parked in front of it. After a third officer arrived they arrested the man for providing a false name and the woman for possessing drug paraphernalia. Both arrestees were handcuffed and secured in separate patrol cars when Gant arrived. The officers recognized his car as it entered the driveway and Officer Griffith confirmed that Gant was the driver by shining a flashlight into the car as it drove by him. Gant parked at the end of the driveway got out of his car and shut the door. Griffith who was about 30 feet away called to Gant, and they approached each other meeting 10 to 12 feet from Gant’s car. Griffith immediately arrested Gant and handcuffed him. Because the other arrestees were secured in the only patrol cars at the scene Griffith called for backup. When two more officers arrived they locked Gant in the backseat of their vehicle. After Gant had been handcuffed and placed in the back of a patrol car two officers searched his car One of them found a gun and the other discovered a bag of cocaine in the pocket of a jacket on the backseat. Gant was charged with two offenses possession of a narcotic drug for sale and possession of drug paraphernalia the plastic bag in which the cocaine was found He moved to suppress the evidence seized from his car on the ground that the warrantless search violated


References: ^ "Law professor Tomkovicz writes brief for case in upcoming Supreme Court term". The Press-Citizen. 2008-09-29. http://www.google.com http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arizona_v._Gant

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Five minutes later Officer Reilly arrived on the scene and accessed the situation. With diligent research and a thorough investigation, the arrest of the defendants was reinforced by the owner ship of a .38 caliber pistol, a newly registered black Cadillac Sedan as well as a previous criminal record from…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arkansas V. Sanders

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Officer David Isom had already come in contact with the suspect before in January 1976 when he was charged with possession of marijuana. So officer Isom and 2 other police officers watched out for the suspect who arrived on time just like the informant told them. As the suspect left…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Court Essay

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As the Crown sated the facts, the Accused was arrested in September 13, 2011 for distribution of narcotics and prohibited firearms position. The offender was released on conditional sentence due to the judge was satisfied that the offender did not pose danger to the community. The offender has been on house arrest until the date of his trail and he breached his condition five times. On March 2nd, 2013 the accused was having an argument at home with his family and he decided to leave the house for a walk to cool down and the police spot him and ran his name through…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    So Aldo did his job and alert that in the driver's side door smelled drugs which give Wheatley probable cause so that the police officer to search Harris truck. The reason, the police officer use a warrantless search and arrest was because at the commission moment it was not feasible to obtaining warrant prior to the search and arrest. Aldo's alert investigation give substantial evidence that Harry has committed a crime that lead to the discovery of "200 loose pseudoephedrine pills, 8,000 matches, a bottle of hydrochloric acid, two containers of antifreeze, and a coffee filter full of iodine crystals- all ingredients for making methamphetamine." Once again, the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution allows the police officer like Wheetley to conducted a warrantless search to Harris's truck because in that circumstances it was likely that the evidence will be destroyed. As a result, the trial court permitted the evidence to be submitted at trial that most likely will confirm the charged of possession of pseudoephedrine against…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dlk Case Study

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Federal agents suspected DLK was growing marijuana in his home and scanned DLK’s home from outside with a thermal imager which is a device that detects warmth within the home. The results were consistent with the use of heat intensive lights used in growing marijuana indoors and based on the scan and other evidence, the agents were able to obtain a warrant which was used to search the home where they found more than 100 marijuana plants. Within the search and seizure case of DLK, the government did not go too far because they had suspicion, did not invade the privacy of the suspect, and there was danger of loss of evidence.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Terry V. Ohio

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A Cleveland detective (McFadden), on a downtown beat which he had been patrolling for many years, observed two stranger on a street corner. He saw them proceed alternately back and forth along an identical route, pausing to stare in the same store window, which they did for a total of about 24 times. Each completion of the route was followed by a conference between the two on a corner, at one of which they were joined by a third man who left swiftly. Suspecting the two men of "casing a job, a stick-up," the officer followed them and saw them rejoin the third man a couple of blocks away in front of a store. The officer approached the three, identified himself as a policeman, and asked their names. The men "mumbled something," whereupon McFadden spun petitioner around, patted down his outside clothing, and found in his overcoat pocket, but was unable to remove, a pistol. The officer ordered the three into the store. He removed petitioner's overcoat, took out a revolver, and ordered the three to face the wall with their hands raised. He patted down the outer clothing of Chilton and Katz and seized a revolver from Chilton's outside overcoat pocket. He did not put his hands under the outer garments of Katz (since he discovered nothing in his pat-down which might have been a weapon), or under petitioner's or Chilton's outer garments until he felt the guns. The three were taken to the police station. Petitioner and Chilton were charged with carrying concealed weapons.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On October 18th and 22nd of the year 1990, a Syracuse police officer was working undercover for the DEA and confidential informant Luther Gregory made purchases of cocaine from Morales. While the transaction was going down, Parke was outside the facility conducting surveillance. On October 30, 1990, Wallie Howard (the Syracuse police officer) was shot and killed during a cocaine “buy-bust.” Morales, Stewart, and Lawrence are tried and found guilty in a court of law. They attempted to appeal the conviction based on the defense of self-defense. They were denied but still able to be acquitted.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Facts: In September 2004, New Mexico police officers received a report that Larry Begay, the…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Journalist Peter Lance was pulled over early in the morning on New Year’s Day when Officer Bruno Peterson said he observed Lance’s car stopped at a green light for three to five seconds. Officer Peterson said he pulled on side of Lance and saw him looking down so he shone his light toward the car. Lance then looked at the officer then looked back down into his lap before looking up and driving through the green light. Lance was pulled over a block-and-a-half later and when the departments drinking and driving officer showed up and conducted the investigation. After conducting the investigation the arresting officer Beutel, reported that Lance failed his breathalyzer and field sobriety test. The case went before a judge and both sides presented their stories and evidence. After hearing both sides, the judge decided to dismiss the case saying Officer Peterson did not have probable cause to stop Peter Lance to begin with. (Meagher, 2011).…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chris Finish is a licensed driver who has owned his car for about six months. On the night of his arrest, he picked up Josh Kings at approximately 8:00 p.m. While double parked outside a store 24 police notice an expired inspection sticker on the defendants vehicle. the officer stopped them at approximately 10:30 p.m. After questions them for a bit the officer notices a handgun under the passenger seat. Both men denied any knowledge of the gun. The defendants lawyer moved for a directed verdict, The motion was denied, Chris is now appealing his conviction. John Kings has not been seen sense the night of the arrest.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This incident occurred inside 848 Summit Avenue #1. The location is a rear duplex to the rear of a long east-west driveway running along the north side of 844 Summit Avenue, which faces the street.…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Minnesota vs. Timothy Dickerson, two police officers parked in an unmarked car, outside of an apartment building known for trafficking contraband substances, did willfully and knowingly stop and frisk respondent due to suspicious and evasive behavior, exiting the twelve-unit apartment building. The officers felt that upon his exit and approach towards patrol car, and eye contact with one of the officers, he turned and proceeded into a side alley. Officers then pursued respondent feeling his suspicious and evasive behavior was probable of being criminal in nature. They pulled their car into the alley and immediately stopped and searched the defendants outer clothing finding no weapons. During the cursory search one officer testified that he had felt a cellophane bag containing crack cocaine later when weighed a total of 1/5th of a gram was found. The officers claimed it within their scope to search and seize what the officer suspected to be drugs inside the defendants clothing.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On 9/16/2017 at 1330 hours, I Officer Graves, conducted a traffic stop in reference to a speeding violation. Upon further investigation it was determined the driver, Tate, had a warrant for worthless checks. Tate was served the warrant and placed under arrest roadside. Tate appeared before Magistrate Rodgers and given a written promise to appear.…

    • 59 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Riverside police detective Kevin Townsend decided to conduct a probation search on George Roussell’s home. The detective was having a very time trying to figure out where the Roussell lived. The probation agency said that Roussell lived in Moreno Valley, but the court system said that he lived in Corona. Roussells DMV address was on a Gould street in Riverside, but all his recent information like the local utilities and phone company showed that he was living at 8123 Magnolia Avn. Apt. 85 in Riverside. Detective Townsend made the decision that the Magnolia apartments had to be his current residents because of the utility bills. He also believed that was his home because most probationers and parolees give false addresses so that they can avoid warren less arrest. Most probationers and parolees don’t know that the police have access to there utility bills. Police use there utility bills so that they can track the criminals down and find out where they live.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arizona v. Gant (2009) SCOTUS rule held that the Belton rule was revised as the justices stated that it did not give authority for the police officers to search an arrestee’s vehicle if the occupant had been arrested and therefore could not access the interior of the car. This implies that the police should only search the arrestee and places that could be reached. Gant could no longer reach the interior of his car, and there was no reasonable ground to suppose that a search would produce evidence to support the offense of driving on a suspended license. Gant v. Arizona established that a search of a vehicle after an arrest is permissible when the arrestee is not confined, and the passenger compartment is within their immediate reach.…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays