Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Aristotle – Nicomachean Ethics

Good Essays
1347 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Aristotle – Nicomachean Ethics
Aristotle – Nicomachean Ethics
Book I
1. What does it mean to say Aristotle’s ethical theory is “teleological?”
In Aristotle’s world, nature, which is made up of matter and form, is teleological, meaning it has an end or goal. For example, the telos of an acorn is to turn into an oak tree. At first something has its potential and then it makes the choice in life to actualize that potential, by virtue, and be the best it can be. There is an aim and purpose to everything and a purpose to everything.

2. How does Aristotle argue that there must be at least one final good/end? What is it?
Aristotle argues that everything we do is for some purpose and all our actions aim at some goal or end. We naturally aim at the good or in other words, “that at which all things aim.” The final end is to be happy which is also considered to be the highest good.

3. What is Aristotle’s definition of happiness?
The definition of happiness is eudemonia, meaning the realization or actualization of unique human capacities. Happiness is a complete and sufficient good, this implies that it is desired for itself, that it is not desired for the sake of anything else and it’s stable.

4. Explain the “function” argument. How does Aristotle prove that there is no higher good for man than doing human things well?
According to Aristotle, humans are by nature rational animals. The best human life will be a life of activity in accord with reason. A good human life is when you are being the best human you can be. A life in accord with reason is a life of virtue. This will lead to the ultimate end in happiness.

5. Give a description of the various “parts” of the human soul. Why is knowledge of the soul important? NOT SURE ON THIS ONE!

Book II
1. What is a “virtue?” How does Aristotle define it? Be able to list four Aristotelian moral virtues and their corresponding excess and deficiencies.
A virtue is made up of genus, a general category, and species, a specific difference. The genus of virtue is made up of emotion, capacity and characteristic. Everyone has character which is a settled state or disposition.
4 Aristotelian moral virtues
1) Temperance
2) Prudence
3) Justice
4) Courage

2. Explain how moral virtues are acquired.
We become good human beings by doing good actions. The result of habits and practicing to be good are moral virtue and these must be developed early. We must be able to train the soul by doing activities that will help it.

3. Explain Aristotle’s doctrine of the mean. Explain how a virtuous passion and a virtuous action are (a) relative to the individual and yet (b) objective.
The doctrine of the mean tells us about the structure of virtue. The appropriate amount of passion to feel on any given circumstance is some point between two extremes where the extremes are vices and the intermediate point is a virtue. They are objective because everything must aim for a mean.

4. What does Aristotle mean when he says “the virtues are implanted in us neither by nature nor contrary to nature”? NOT SURE ON THIS ONE!

5. List and explain the three additional characteristics (besides habit) required for virtue.
1) You must know what you are doing
2) You must choose to act virtuously and choose to act because the action is good
3) Your action must spring from an unchangeable character

Book III
1. Explain the difference between voluntary and involuntary action.
Voluntary action – We receive praise or blame. Source of action is within oneself and it is in their power to act or not. It is done with nothing making you do it.
Involuntary action – We are pardoned or sometimes even pitied. Actions done under constraint or do to ignorance. You are forced to do this.

2. What does Aristotle mean when he says “what seems good to a man of high moral standards is truly the object of wish”?
What is good for a person differs with different characteristics and what makes a man of high quality is the ability to see the truth in every moral question.

3. Explain what Aristotle means when he says: “That no one is involuntarily happy is true, but wickedness in voluntary.”
No one is involuntarily happy and if we don’t accept that wickedness is voluntary, we must contradict the conclusions at which we have arrived. We must deny that man is the source and begetter of his actions. If conclusions are accepted, then all actions in which the initiative lies in us are in our power and are voluntary.

Book VI
1. What are “intellectual virtues?”
Dispositions of our mind to know the truth. And a kind of wisdom acquired by teaching.

2. Explain what “practical wisdom” is. What does a person of practical wisdom know? Explain the role of practical wisdom in moral virtue. How is it connected to happiness? Why is it not possible to have moral virtue without practical wisdom?
Practical wisdom is also known as prudence. To split up the two words, practical means action and wisdom means knowledge/ intellect. Knowledge about what is good in a particular situation and being able to perceive what it is good to do. It is the capacity to act in accord with the good of humanity. A person with practical wisdom knows what happiness consists and has a general knowledge of what happiness is.

Aquinas – Treatise on Law
1. What is Aquinas’ definition of “law?” Explain each “part” of the definition.
1) An ordinance of reason (If you want A, do B).
2) For the common good (Benefits everyone).
3) Made by the one who has care of the community (Authority).
4) Promulgated (Made known to people).

2. Explain Aquinas’ distinction between “human acts” and “acts done by a human.” Which one constitutes moral actions?
All human acts are voluntarily, but not always with choice. Human acts are acts done by a human being but not vice versa. They are moral acts (right or wrong) and subject to moral law. They are actions a human performs as human. Human acts are directed toward our ultimate end (happiness). Acts done by a human are ones that come from reason and are chosen through deliberation. They are anything a human may do.

3. What is “eternal law?”
God’s big picture for the world (Ultimate law giver) It is the final end that we can’t entirely know but encompasses everything through a divine providence.

4. What is “natural law”?
Our participation in the Eternal law when you do things of your nature.

5. What is “divine law”?
God’s revelation to us in the Bible (10 Commandments)

6. What is “human law”?
Civil Law (Legislature) An example is traffic law. This is to coerce people into acting properly in order to have peace. Laws are there to help people become good. People follow this because it is good for society. To be right, all human law must come from reason and must flow from the natural law (makes it just).

7. Explain how the four different kind of law are related to one another. NOT SURE ON THIS ONE!

8. What is the first precept of the natural law? How does Aquinas arrive at this first precept?
The first precept/ rule of natural law, which is self-evident, is “do good, avoid evil.” Something can’t both be and not be at the same time, in the same respect. It is the law of non-contradiction.

9. When is a human law just? When is it unjust?
Human law is just if it accords with natural law. It satisfies all the requirements to be a law in the first place. A human law is unjust if it fails to meet any of the criteria of law (has no power).

10. (a) How is Aquinas’ moral theory similar to Aristotle’s moral theory? (b) How is it different? IM GUESSING THIS IS THE LONG ESSAY

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Aristotle’s beliefs on living a good life start with careful deliberation of the ends and the means. Suppose I want a laptop--the laptop is my goal, purpose, or end. I can do various things to get the laptop--such as earn, steal, borrow, or save. These things are known as my means. The means I decide to use depends on which is more convenient and which leads to the most benefits. Contemplating about the end goal that we are pursuing, and the means we use to reach that goal is practical thinking. However, this type of thinking does not come to fruition, until purposeful action occurs; which is acting with some purpose, goal, or end in mind. This purposeful action is compared differently with thoughtless action, which is an action with no purpose…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle believed that we as humans have natural obligations that provide happiness. Happiness consists of pleasure and the capacity to develop reasoning.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Please respond to the questions in bold. All your responses to this assignment should be based on the information given on “Was Aristotle Right or Wrong?”…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Book 1, Aristotle states “but in every activity and undertaking, it is the end, for it is for the sake of this that they all do the rest” (Arist. EN 1.7, 1097a21, trans. Rowe). By excising this rationality for goodness, it ultimately leads to happiness, which is the reason for all action. Here, Aristotle supplies his teleological perspective that humans are goal or purpose oriented. For businesspersons, the goal could be considered to supply goods and services while adding value to all stakeholders. Although, Aristotle would argue that the goal of the businessperson is not an end in itself, rather it is a subordinate end that creates means to higher ends. Thus, to understand how to be a good person, one must understand the higher end purpose, happiness, which is pursued for its own sake. Aristotle's conception of happiness focuses on the activity of success and fulfillment (Green, R. M. G. A., 2013, p. 9). Aristotle considers happiness as an activity. For the businessperson this could mean receiving a promotion. Happiness is not a single activity, rather it is the consistent exercise of reason and appropriate virtues that lead to success and fulfillment (Green, R. M. G. A., 2013, p. 10). The virtues…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    PHI2000 The Good Life

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Aristotle believes that one’s accomplishments in being happy are the driving force to a “Good Life”. The good life creates a happiness that relates to one functioning well and reason. Aristotle believes that it takes time, hard work and restraint to get to the employ the habits of reasoning and according to him everything has a purpose (Rachels and Rachels, pg 54). Aristotle states that “Good” has rightly been defined as “that at which all things aim” and that people identify happiness with living well or doing well (Sommers & Sommers, 2010).…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the quest to find out what is the ultimate human good, Aristotle dedicated Book 1 of the Nicomachean Ethics to provide an account of what is the ultimate human good, and what it consists of. This essay will examine why Aristotle thinks that eudaimonia (happiness), is the ultimate human good. Through this discussion, we will see Aristotle suggest four central views which are critical to eudaimonia being the ultimate human good. Firstly, one has to live a life according to one’s function. Secondly, natural, virtuous activity is required in order to live a life of happiness. Thirdly, one requires possessing external goods such as wealth, power and friends in order to be happy. Last but not least, in order to live a life of happiness, one has to live a whole life in accordance to virtue in order to determine if the person lived a happy life.…

    • 1794 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis P. Pojman's Analysis

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Aristotle was Plato’s prize pupil who discussed the types of moments where moral correctness may be applied to certain events, nature of virtues involved in the sound morality of humans as well as the ways to achieve happiness in one’s life. The overall question that Aristotle tends to ask himself and try to answer is the question that pertains to human character and personality, what do we as humans need to do, to be considered as a good person. Aristotle explained that every activity has a final cause and purpose at which it aims to achieve and he argued that since there is not an infinite amount of goods, there has to be one type of good that is the highest and most important which humans strive towards. He continues to describe this ultimate good and decided that it could be called happiness, however the only puzzling question left is, what is happiness? Due to its existence in so many forms it is tough to describe happiness as one true thing…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Virtue, Aristotle suggests, involves finding the 'mean' between the two extremes of excess and deficiency. Not mediocrity, but harmony and balance. If we achieve this, he thinks, then we will be psychologically content. For example, as good humans, we should try to be reasonably courageous, but not ridiculously reckless or absurdly timid. Apart from courage, the other moral virtues are listed as: temperance, liberality, magnificence, magnanimity, proper ambition, patience, truthfulness, wittiness, friendliness and modesty.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Social Responsibility

    • 1604 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In Aristotle’s theory of morality, Nicomachean Ethics, he surmises that all human activities aim at some end or good. There are three types of good, sensual (pleasure), political (noble virtues for citizens), of life of thought (contemplation) (Arthur & Scalet, 2009, p. 51). He states “every scientific inquiry, and similarly every action and purpose may be said to aim at some good”. What he is saying is that everything has an end point which is something good. Everything we want to accomplish is for some good. The ends are many, and he goes on to say the end of the medical art I health, the end of the shipbuilding is a vessel, the end of strategy is victory, and the end of economics is wealth. One piece, to point out is Aristotle states there is a final end. For example some may think of money as an end, however, without something to purchase, money is meaningless. Working for example is an action not a goal, work is not the good, so what is the supreme end, what are you working to attain? “Perhaps happiness is the supreme good” (Arthur & Scalet, 2009, p. 52).…

    • 1604 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle was a greek philosopher who wrote the book “Nicomachean Ethics”. Aristotle’s view of human natures centers around humans achieving happiness. Too him happiness is our highest goal in life. Aristotle points out that most people in this world have a false view of what happiness really means. Most think of it as physical pleasure like eating, sex, or honor. These people have an imperfect view of what it means to be alive and what it means to be happy. The reason people have a false idea of happiness is because they lack virtue. Virtue is behaving in the right manner. Such as being courageous in life or being a coward. If one is courageous they will find happiness in being such while the coward would find happiness in the opposite but that is a false happiness. Aristotle takes the reader through the true meaning of being alive. He talks about many different aspects of achieving the good life and being happy; he stresses on topics like eudaemonia, classes of goods, and our telos and function in this world.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philosophy 120w

    • 1079 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Human function is necessary for our well-being. Defined as an activity of the soul based on thinking and reasoning human function is also known as being the best good when it comes to happiness, because it is complete (7). Aristotle compared how our happiness is so essential to our lives the same way it is necessary for a plant to live a purely nutritive life and an animal needs to live a life based on sense perception and desire (intro.) Every one of us has a function, but it is different from person to person because it is solely based on reasoning. The following example comes from page 9 in the text: “The function of a harpist is the same as the function of an excellent harpist.” Both harpists want to play the harp, well, but how they accomplish this goal comes from their personal thinking and reasoning. We live based on all decisions personally made coming from this practical reasoning, when these decisions are completed, happiness will come to us. Reading on,…

    • 1079 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aristotle believed that every object has a specific purpose and function and that its supreme good is to fulfil that purpose. This includes humans, Aristotle believes that humans also have a purpose and function so when it fulfils it then it reaches supreme good like other objects. He believes that the supreme good for humans is to reach eudaimonia which is to live a good life to help you flourish. He saw this as the final goal is to flourish so all the actions they do is to help them reach this in the end. This is where natural Law comes in.…

    • 1800 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The basic idea behind Aristotle’s book is that the ultimate goal in life is to achieve true happiness. This particular idea makes the most sense to me. “Happiness, then, is found to be something perfect and self-sufficient, being the end to which our actions are directed” (Aristotle, Page 15). This quote states that happiness is the final, the end and all other things will lead up to this. Happiness is stated to direct our actions because people all want to be happy. This idea gives people the feeling of “self-sufficient” because no other person can make another person achieve the ultimate good because it is all dependent on the person. Happiness is a perfect thing because no one truly knows what it is until they reach it themselves. The idea of happiness is subjective around the world given the different cultures so it is impossible to even begin to describe specifically how to reach the ultimate good. He also says "Since happiness is a certain sort of activity of the soul in accord with complete virtue, we must examine virtue; for that will perhaps also be a way to study happiness better" (Aristotle, 16). Happiness is a virtue and in order to know happiness then you need to have an idea of what a virtue is. Virtue is the behavior showing high moral standards. Moral standards are important in all culture and especially in the Geek culture because of the gods who…

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He says in his writing “be the highest good and the condition of all the rest, even of the desire for happiness”. (Immanuel Kant,9) Although happiness is what we all want, it is more important do always do the good for the good and not for the benefits of what is the outcome. Aristotle believes we do good for the happiness but Kant believes we need to just do the good for the good and if it makes us happy, good. Although they may seem a little different, with Kant more worried about the good and Aristotle worried about the happiness that comes from the good they are both needed to be…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Is life really about the 'money', the 'cash', the 'hoes', who has the biggest gold chain or who drives the shiniest or fastest car, who sells the most albums or who has the most respect? Aristotle challenges views, which are similar to the ones held and shown by rap artists such as Jay-Z and the Notorious B.I.G., by observing that everything in the universe, including humans, has a telos, or goal in life. He states that the goal of a human life is to achieve happiness or eudaimonia. I believe that Aristotle is completely correct in his reasoning of the purpose of human nature. He even explains how happiness is different for every person, and each different type of person has a different idea of eudaimonia. He then goes on to talk about how a person must do all things in moderation, not doing the excess but at the same time doing just enough. This idea, called the "golden mean of moderation" was the backbone support to Aristotle's idea of human telos because it concluded that living a virtuous life must be the same for all people because of the way human beings are built.<br><br>Aristotle argued that the goal of human beings is happiness, and that we achieve happiness when we fulfill our function. Therefore, it is necessary to determine what our function is. The function of a thing, or its telos, is what it alone can do, or what it can do best. Like the function of the eye is to see, Aristotle declared the human being as the "rational animal" whose function is to reason. Thus, according to Aristotle, a happy life for human beings is a life governed by reason. <br><br>Aristotle believed that a person who has difficulty behaving ethically is morally imperfect. His ideal person practices the "golden mean of moderation." He believed that this moral virtue, of which happiness comes from, is a matter of avoiding extremes in behavior and finding the mean between them. Aristotle conceives happiness not primarily as an exercise of virtue in private or with friends, but as…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays