Aristotle Just And Unjust Essay

Lastly, one of the many well-known philosophers in history, is Aristotle (384 BC - 322 BC), who believed in more of a natural institution. Aristotle was heavily influenced by Plato, but disagreed with some aspects of his philosophy. However, Aristotle agreed with Plato’s theory, in which humans are political animals, but what sets humans different from animals, is that humans can reason. Hence, this forces people to live according to their reason rather than their passions. The downside of this ideology, is that the thoughts on a particular topic one would have, would be significantly different from other people, thus there reasoning on what is just and unjust can also be different. As a result, if a leader cannot distinguish the wrong in an unjust act, society would not be able to protect people from evil individuals, resulting in a dangerous society to live in. Moving on, Aristotle thought humans fall into one of three
As a result, the validity of this theory contradicts the sole purpose of law; which is to keep people safe and protect one’s rights. A prime example where this Aristotle's theory is at fault, is the Holocaust, where Adolf Hitler was responsible for the annihilation of over six million Jews. Even though, Adolf Hitler was academically smart in his younger years, his understanding of what's right and wrong was totally different compared to other people. Thus, a community that lives by natural law, can easily be persuaded if an atrocious leader decides to combine reasoning, force and fear to manipulate a society into carrying out wrongful acts against other people. Overall, a community that believes in natural law and theories linked to Aristotle, can cause corruption and disorder, which will not turn out good in the long