Preview

Aristotle Friendship Of Pleasure Analysis

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
151 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Aristotle Friendship Of Pleasure Analysis
The second type of friendship that aristotle discusses is the friendship of pleasure . The friendship of pleasure is genreally seen builiding up between young people as thier relationships are based on pleasures and passions .Aristotle thinks the frienship of pleasure can be seen between a group of likeminded people shring same intesr , passion between lovers.It is diffrent from the friendship of utility as the people who are seeking frienship of utility they are genreally looking for benifits from the other person or trying to seek any advantage in a long term but friensdhip of pleasure is where one is seeking pleasure presently.Normally this type of realtionships that are based on passion are seen in youth which change constantly .Thus
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Praise Of Peer Pleasure Analysis
    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Praise Of Peer Pleasure Analysis

    GQ: What do I like about the Shea’s essay “In Praise of Peer Pleasure”? I like that it really puts a new positive mask over the negative outlook that peer pressure gets. The idea that peer pressure makes people do things that they don’t like rains true in this essay. However, these people are doing good things for themselves and others in return, without even realizing it. JW: In this essay the things that I was interested in were the studies, phycologist got people to do things just because they made people feel outcast. College students drank less, and homeowners used less electricity all this just because they were told that the average person uses less. The way I see it, I might be pulled into the same shared if I wasn’t aware of it.…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aristotle and Happiness
    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Aristotle and Happiness

    1. According to the text a full functioning completely happy person will be mentally, physically, spiritually, financially, professionally, creatively, and socially healthy & well rounded individual. Happiness involves being really alive and not just existing. Aristotle believes that a person should work hard doing what they love, they also shouldn’t devote their lives to acquiring riches since riches don’t provide happiness. One should also reject fame and public success to become happy as self sufficiency is believed to provide happiness. Happiness is a process starting from infancy. A happy life is a life where spiritual, physical and social needs are met under reason and moderation. I think Aristotle recipe of happiness involves a person making a conscience decision to do the right thing in all aspects of their life. I think the happiness he refers to is obtained by living a healthy life, being in tune with our psyche, having a career that we enjoy, having friends and family to love, and having enough riches to support ourselves without gloating about them.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Cicero On Friendship
    • 915 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Cicero On Friendship

    Cicero had multiple characteristics on friendship; however in this paper only three of his characteristics of friendship will be discussed. According to Cicero, friendship is founded on a moral and ethical base, and there is a relationship between virtue and friendship. Virtue is essential for friendship and friendship helps in maintaining virtue. Virtue is behavior showing high moral standards. Therefore friendship is based on virtue, and friendship helps achieve greater virtue. Cicero supports this in his text by saying “Those who place the ultimate good in virtue act the most splendidly, and virtue produces and contains friendship within itself, nor can friendship exist in any way without virtue.” (Cicero 8). When choosing friends, it would be best to pick ones with the same morals. However regardless of different cultures and lifestyles almost everyone has similar morals. We should all aim to get the most out of a healthy relationship that includes learning good morals and virtues.…

    • 915 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Friendships In Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics
    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Friendships In Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics

    In Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics, he states that there are three types of friendships that can be obtained- the friendship of pleasure, the friendship of utility and the friendship of good. The friendship of pleasure is a relationship based on the simple enjoyment of being around a particular person; the friendship of utility is a relationship based on convenience. In other words, this friendship has no real meaning behind it, other than this person is around this person frequently, so they might as well be friends. Lastly, the third category of friendship is that based on good. Friendship of good is the pure delight of one person and everything about that person. Good is the best form of friendship because it is the most virtuous. This…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Happiness Aristotle’s and the Stoics’ View
    • 1754 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Happiness Aristotle’s and the Stoics’ View

    Happiness is all around the world, it is a very genuine and important thing, and everyone wants to be happy. Being happy is what makes life worth living, and it makes life a lot better in every way possible. What makes people happy though? Are bodily and external goods necessary to happiness? I would say no because by which they can make you happy, they are not necessary for human happiness. It’s not what things you buy, the pain, the suffering, or enjoyment your body might get. Human happiness comes from somewhere else within the human. Comparing and contrasting Aristotle’s and the Stoics’ view of human happiness will help give a better clear and logical understanding on what really happiness is and why I believe that bodily and external goods are not necessary for happiness.…

    • 1754 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Pleasure Principle
    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Pleasure Principle

    The purpose of life has been discussed since the beginning. No one knows the meaning of life, and if they do, they’re not telling. Even trying to write off life as having no point doesn’t satisfy anyone; it doesn’t’ make a difference. Brittany doesn’t like the egocentric view that humans take as to say the answer purpose of life exists solely within themselves, not animals or other species.…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle: the Nicomachean Ethics
    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Aristotle: the Nicomachean Ethics

    In these two books, Aristotle talked about friendship. He started by stating what the three different types of friendship are. The first type is when it is based on utility. This type of friendship is all about getting a benefit from someone else, and it will change according to circumstances. If a person doesn’t get benefits from the other anymore, the friendship will cease to be present. Benefits don’t have to be the only ground for friendship of this type, but there are definitely clear benefits involved. One example of this type of friendship Aristotle gave was friendships with foreigners. The second type of friendship is based on pleasure. In this type, you find the other person entertaining, and it is more about the experience of being near the person than anything else. This type is common between young people because young people’s lives are regulated by feelings. These friendships come and go often, and the friend doesn’t bring much to the friendship. The last type of friendship is based on goodness. This is when two “good” people are friends for the sake of each other. Both people in this friendship wish for the good of the other, and this type of relationship is most durable. Aristotle considered this type to be the perfect friendship. He didn’t care for the first two types because they are both short-lived, and they are circumstantial (Pgs. 203-208).…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Cicero: on Friendship Analysis
    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Cicero: on Friendship Analysis

    Aristotle once said, “Friendship is a single soul dwelling in two bodies.” There are many things that go into the process of friendship. Some people deal with friendship one way while others deal with it in another way. Cicero had a lot to say about the different aspects of friendship in his time, but how would he view modern friendship? Some friendships Cicero may not be proud of; like the common relationships that are forced on in a classroom or work place and the lack of allowing nature to take control and make the friendships that are meant to happen. However, Cicero would be happy with the way the higher level friendships have developed in virtue and value.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle View on Happiness
    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Aristotle View on Happiness

    People have defined happiness as some kind of good of a human being. In Nicomachean Ethics: Book I, Aristotle defines happiness as the activity of living well, which in the Greek word is called eudaimonia. He tends to think that happiness is how we balance and moderate our lives to seek the highest pleasures, which he calls maintaining the mean. In the following excerpt from Book I, Aristotle talks about how happiness presumably consists in attaining some good or set of goods. “Now goods have been divided into three classes, and some are described as external, others as relating to soul or to body; we call those that relate to soul most properly and truly goods, and psychical actions and activities we class as relating to soul” (Book I pg. 7). He is saying that since happiness consists in attaining some good that there are three different types of goods that you can attain; an external goods, which consists of wealth or honor, goods of the body, which is health or physical strength, and lastly goods of the soul, which consists of knowledge, education, and friendship. Aristotle goes on to say how only certain goods are necessary for happiness. “It is correct also in that we identify the end with certain actions and activities; for thus it falls among goods of the soul and not among external goods. Another belief which harmonizes with our account is that the happy man lives well and does well; for we have practically defined happiness as a sort of good life and good action” (Book I pg. 7). He is saying that only certain goods such as health are the necessary preconditions for happiness and that other goods such as wealth is just something extra that help fill out a good life for a virtuous person, but the possession of virtue or excellence is the element of happiness. Aristotle also adds that humans seek different goods that make them happy compared to animals because humans have a rational capacity that when exercised perfects our natures as human beings.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle and the Pursuit of Happiness
    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Aristotle and the Pursuit of Happiness

    Eudaimonia stands for happiness in Greek. Aristotle argues that the highest good for human beings is happiness. He insists that every action performed by humans is to pursue happiness. Aristotle also argues that human action is always aimed at some end or good. This "good" may not be viewed as a good action or any good by others, but for the doer of the action ("good"), the activity will be perceived as good and that it will bring a favorable outcome. Aristotle also said that all of our actions resulting in ends or goods form a hierarchy. This hierarchy, incorporates a ladder of things, and this ladder would categorize things according to their importance. And the most important thing would be on top of the ladder, thus being the ultimate end. This ultimate end is what all the actions aim to reach at or achieve. [This end must be self-sufficient, it must be attainable and it must be what we want]1. Therefore, because happiness includes all these, then it must be the highest good. An example of this ladder could be a person working hard to lose weight or trying to stay in shape. The bottom step of the ladder is the person working out in a gym, but why is the person working out? To lose weight or maintain their shape. Why does the person want to lose weight or maintain their shape? To look good physically and to be healthy. Why does the person want to look good or be healthy? To be attractive and to lead a stress-less and a comfortable life. And why does the person want to be attractive and/or lead a healthy life? To have peace of mind and to be happy. This example shows that every action is aimed at some end and the ultimate end to the action is happiness. Therefore based on the circumstances, the highest good is happiness and happiness alone.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Plato vs. Aristotle
    • 2421 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Plato vs. Aristotle

    Numerous experts in modern time regard Plato as the first genuine political philosopher and Aristotle as the first political scientist. They were both great thinkers in regards to, in part with Socrates, being the foundation of the great western philosophers. Plato and Aristotle each had ideas in how to proceed with improving the society in which they were part of during their existence. It is necessary therefore to analyze their different theoretical approaches regarding their philosophical perspectives, such as ethics and psychology. This paper however will mainly concentrate on Aristotle's views on friendship and how it impacts today's society.…

    • 2421 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What Is Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics Annotated
    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages

    What Is Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics Annotated

    What I will use from this source are the different examples and explanations the author provides. The strengths from this article is the in depth focus on the different types of friendships and the…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Comparing Chapters 8 And Nine Of Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics
    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Comparing Chapters 8 And Nine Of Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics

    Within book 8 and 9 of Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, he proposes friendship is one of the most choice-worthy goods an individual can have (Aristotle 149, 1170a, section 7). However, in chapter 3 of book 8, Aristotle asserts the finest friendships are enduring insofar it is good, and the virtues remain the same. However, his proposal about the similarities of virtues doesn't seem entirely correct since people gradually change over time, but the relationship can continue to be good and individuals remain close friends. Problematically, Aristotle asserts if the characteristics of the friend were to change, the friendship ought to be dissolved since the peer can potentially become bad; unless the agent can return their friend to their original…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle Living a Human Life/Human Nature
    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Aristotle Living a Human Life/Human Nature

    Aristotle was a man of philosophy, science, and mathematics. He used these three tools to explain what he thought the purpose of being a human being was, and just what being a human being entailed. To describe what a human being was, he came up with many theories, which involved friendship, happiness, and human nature. He also believed that not everyone was a perfect human, meaning, there were things an individual must do throughout his or her life to achieve becoming a Good person and ultimately becoming a happy person. Throughout this paper, I will be explaining what a full human life really is and then critiquing some of Aristotle's beliefs about human nature. I may agree or disagree with some of his points. The fact remains, I will use my own views in many cases to defend my points because to me, that is the point of this paper and the class, to understand a way of thinking, and argue for or against that way through the use of philosophy and intellectual thinking.…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aristotle's Friendship Of Utility
    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Aristotle's Friendship Of Utility

    2. The friendship of utility Aristotle’s second type of friendship is the friendship of utility. In a friendship of utility, “people love one another because they are useful and only in so far as they are useful” (116). A damaged friendship of utility can be repaired with monetary compensation for the damage that was done – since all utility eventually amounts to money anyway. A friendship of utility will naturally end when one or both members stop being useful to the other.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics