Preview

Aristotle's State Theory

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1940 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Aristotle's State Theory
Aristotle’s claim that the state is the highest, most developed form of social organisation is at the centre of one of his major works, ‘The Politics’ . His theory focuses mainly on the state as a natural progression, and draws upon two central themes; ‘the good life’ and human beings as ‘political animals’ . Whilst Aristotle does raise many valid points, he does not convince us that the state is the pinnacle of social organisation. Although the state may be the highest form of social organisation, Aristotle fails to demonstrate how an active, political life equals a ‘good life’. Aristotle’s major use of teleology is another drawback, which limits his argument in many ways. To illustrate these concerns it is important to analysis Aristotle’s argument in its entirety and to put it in its context. Also, a critical analysis of his two major themes, that of ‘the good life’ and man as a ‘political animal’, will allow us to understand where Aristotle does indeed fail.
Aristotle's 'The Politics' encompasses many themes and topics, some of which provide the basis for the state being the highest form of social organisation. Written during the fourth century BC , Aristotle’s work forms the basis for many arguments concerning philosophy and is still extensively used today. Aristotle claims that the state is a natural process, and in order to understand its complexity it is necessary to study the state in its “first growth and origin” . It is natural for human beings to live within the state and natural for humans to reach their potential within it. Furthermore, Aristotle also places a strong emphasis on good and evil in his work. The state is a natural process, and therefore it has a natural end, anything that disrupts this process is evil. Perfection is also important in Aristotle’s work, which can be achieved by man within the state. Aristotle’s teleological approach is highly important to his argument and reaffirms many of the points he raises. The good life is at the



Bibliography: Ackrill, J.L. Essays on Plato and Aristotle. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997. Arnhart, L. Aristotle on Political Reasoning: A Commentary on the Rhetoric. Dekalb: Northen Illinois University Press, 1981. Chappell, T. D. J. Aristotle and Augustine on Freedom : Two Theories of Freedom, Voluntary Action and Akrasia. New York: St Martin 's Press, 1995. Falcon, A. "Commentators on Aristotle". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-commentators/. Miller, F. “Aristotle’s Political Theory”. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-politics/. Mulgan, R.G. Aristotle 's Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977. Randall, J.H. Aristotle. New York: Columbia University Press, 1960. Reeve, C.D.C, trans. Aristotle, Politics. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1998. Sorabji, R. Aristotle Transformed: The Ancient Commentators and their Influence. New York: Cornell University Press, 1990.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    When comparing Hobbes,’ Sandel’s and Machiavelli’s viewpoints regarding which of Aristotle’s three main categories of knowledge is the most significant for establishing good political systems or making good political decisions, one must consider what each theorists considers to be a good political system and create a link between the two. The most important category of knowledge for establishing and making good political systems for Aristotle is practical knowledge, the purpose of politics is to produce good, virtuous citizens, the law promotes just actions, purpose of legislators is to establish good laws. The most important category of knowledge for Hobbes is scientific knowledge, the absolute sovereign represents the commonwealth of its citizens, the absolute sovereign must uphold their self preservation, and all laws…

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Several Greek city-states had the government form of an oligarchy, where the small group of people wield the ruling power. They were considered the highest class as political power was shared amongst the group (Carr). The groups were formed based off of aristocratic birth or wealth (Carr). Unlike this class, the lower class citizens in the oligarchy did not share the same rights as they lacked full political rights and were not eligible to rule (Carr). They are thus excluded from voting or having any type of say for any political decision for the city-state Furthermore, the right to vote or to be eligible for power was based off of wealth in this government form. In contrast to this government for his city-state lived under, Aristotle explores…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In light of an Aristotelian teleology, MacIntyre (ano) argues that our life qua human life, the flourishing life, cannot be attained without the existence of, and our own contribution to, the political structures of the common good in local communities. In fact, the best possible life, he emphasizes, is impossible to realize without reference to a shared pursuit of any higher common good. This means that, the structures of the common good play a fundamental role in the attainment of both individual and communal goods. Goods that are realized through a variety of shared, cooperative practices and activities oriented by the exercise of virtues. In proposing the politics of local community as a different form of political life and political organization…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    government they want to live happily. As Aristotle said, every human has the capacity to distinguish between what is good or bad for the city and it is something that came since a person was born with their natural instinct. They just need the practice and that is the public education that in the city is implemented with virtues. Aristotle is also concerned that human beings are not perfect, or excellent, or always be good, a person can be bad also and it is the natural sense of life. “It follows that there cannot be a single excellence common to all the citizens” (Aristotle 92). Aristotle studies the human behavior in order to create this functional constitution with the needs of the people and the weakness of the human to heal every aspect…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cited: Herrick, James. "Aristotle Rhetoric". The History and Theory of Rhetoric. Needham Heights: MA, 2001. 74-84.…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “There is such a thing as a man being too proud to fight” (“Citizens of Foreign…

    • 9661 Words
    • 39 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aquinas Vs Hobbes

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages

    One of Aristotle’s most prominent teachings in “Politics,” is the interpretation of the state of nature. “It is evident that the state is a creation of nature, and that man is by nature a political animal.” (I. 2. 153a.) From this statement, it is clear that human beings are innately political, regardless of the setting they are in. One example he gives to support his argument is that the hand of a body is similar to an individual of a city. This analogy demonstrates the relation of one functioning part that is attached to the whole and complete functioning system. A functional hand is only used when the entire body is operating correctly. Similarly, the city is comprised of multiple individuals each with specific duties to create a collection of different parts with different functions, all working simultaneously together for the city. The goal is to pursue the common good of the city, even when it conflicts with one’s self-interest. The common good gives people the opportunity to reach the highest form of virtue and requires the whole community. Another example…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * “Argument promises a payoff. You can see why Aristotle dedicated the rhetoric of decision making to the future.” – page 30…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Classical Greek Political Thought deeply focused on structuralizing the political institutions and perfected the allocation of functions among them. Whereas, Thucydides and Aristotle are two distinct personas who dedicated time to craft what is for them the relative best and grasping the truth for the early city-states. Providing a comparison between two identities requires a thorough research with regard to philosophy in life, technique in constructing arguments, and their contributions to the world, in politics to be exact. The purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive analysis with regard to the similarities and differences between the two aforementioned names. To argue, the researcher will provide discourse regarding six major…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main concerns in the works of Plato and Aristotle was understanding and knowing virtue and justice, and deciding who had the best qualities to lead. In both hands, the political community at large and how morals and politics intertwined were the concerns of Plato and Aristotle. Nicolo Mchiavelli, Thomas Hobbes, and John Lock challenge this assumption to a certain point, and familiarize their concerns about good government, order, and human nature. While many have argued that Machiavelli, Hobbes, and Locke are clearly distinguished from the ancient thinkers, this paper will argue that some of the ideas of Plato and Aristotle continued so for modern theorists. Primarily, this paper will recap the influences of Machiavelli, Hobbes, and Locke.…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the state is an organised community of individuals who cooperate and coordinate to live under a single political structure, good governance is necessary. Nicholas Machiavelli contrasts Plato's utopia attending a central problem of politics by practising power over individuals to achieve wellbeing to the state. This essay explores how philosophers approach the concept of power through the virtues shown in their respective works The Republic and The Prince.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Republic by Plato builds an ideal and complete city between Socrates, Adeimantus, and Glaucon. The ideal city distinguishes between justice and injustice by establishing four virtues which are wisdom, courage, moderation, and justice (372e). Each citizen has a specific role or art which they are required to fulfill, in order for the ideal city to function properly. However, the city is not self-sufficient because each citizen is "in need of much. (369c)" In contrast to Plato, Aristotle's Politics expresses a slightly different view of what an ideal city is. He does this through his creation of a polis. The polis consists of partnerships, between the citizens, in the villages and households which make the city complete (1252b125). In comparison to Aristotle, Plato's ideal city lacks certain elements. This includes self sufficiency and speech. In this essay, I will argue that Plato's ideal city is not sufficient for Aristotle's polis because Plato's city is not self-sufficient, while a polis is due to individual roles and the partnership of citizens. Moreover, Aristotle has a more democratic political view because the use of speech allows citizens to question their role and potential in the city.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stoicism And Skepticism

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Sabine, in the introductory essay, mentions the shift that occurred in the type of political organization after Aristotle’s death. Before, it was a city-state, or a polis construction. However, a change towards a larger scale political organization and expansion of ideals causes the polis. This political order is explained,…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aristotle

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle wrote the Nicomachean Ethics, portraying the significance of studying the realms of ethics and political science. In his work, Aristotle focuses on the theme of how human beings can attain the chief human good—happiness—at which everything aims. Aristotle argues that ethics, the study of moral character, and political science, the branch of knowledge and analysis of political activity and behavior, must be closely studied together in order to fully grasp the meaning of and obtain the good way of life.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle’s conception of man as a political animal is more persuasive because it presents a realistic model. The family is the most basic association, which extends and is developed into a political city. Family is not an abstract variable in the polis, political philosophy is founded on the family as a natural association (King 1998: 9). Reproduction is the most natural, instinctual human behaviour, ensuring the continuation of our species. The family is necessary for the perpetuation of the city, meaning that the city must support the family (King 1998: 10).…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays