Preview

Aristotle's State

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
693 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Aristotle's State
In the Politics, Aristotle states that it is clear “that the state is both natural and prior to the individual” (Politics I.1, 1253a18). In saying this, Aristotle means that if an individual were to be separated from the state, he no longer has the function and capacity which defined him before. He reasons that the individual would not be self-sufficient away from the state. Aristotle gives the analogy of a hand being severed from a man’s body. The unattached hand would still be referred to as a hand by name, but it would not serve the same function as a hand attached to a body does. It is in order of metaphysical analysis that makes political communities prior to individuals.

Certain things are not part of the state because they are either incapable (he gives the example of a dumb animal) or because they have no need for the state (he gives the example of a god). However, man needs the state in order to be sufficient.

A life of community is foundational and essential to human existence. To Aristotle, happiness is the end that man want to attain; and the only way to attain that life is by living virtuously in the presence of others. Human beings’ growth and development tend toward the end point of living within a political community.

Aristotle states that man is born with practical wisdom and virtue at his disposal. In order to utilize his wisdom and virtue most effectively, he would use them according to the law and justice. Justice is a feature of the state. Therefore, organizing a political community with the virtue of justice for people to participate in is the best way according to Aristotle.

Aristotle argues that certain people lack the rationality to rule themselves. Women and slaves are permanently subordinated, and they need to be ruled by others. “The slave is wholly lacking the deliberative element; the female has it but lacks authority; the child has it but it is incomplete” (Politics I.1, 1260a11). Aristotle argues that slaves and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Several Greek city-states had the government form of an oligarchy, where the small group of people wield the ruling power. They were considered the highest class as political power was shared amongst the group (Carr). The groups were formed based off of aristocratic birth or wealth (Carr). Unlike this class, the lower class citizens in the oligarchy did not share the same rights as they lacked full political rights and were not eligible to rule (Carr). They are thus excluded from voting or having any type of say for any political decision for the city-state Furthermore, the right to vote or to be eligible for power was based off of wealth in this government form. In contrast to this government for his city-state lived under, Aristotle explores…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    On the Athenian way of thinking, a good political community is one in which citizens live a good (happy, fulfilled) life.…

    • 3000 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In light of an Aristotelian teleology, MacIntyre (ano) argues that our life qua human life, the flourishing life, cannot be attained without the existence of, and our own contribution to, the political structures of the common good in local communities. In fact, the best possible life, he emphasizes, is impossible to realize without reference to a shared pursuit of any higher common good. This means that, the structures of the common good play a fundamental role in the attainment of both individual and communal goods. Goods that are realized through a variety of shared, cooperative practices and activities oriented by the exercise of virtues. In proposing the politics of local community as a different form of political life and political organization…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    government they want to live happily. As Aristotle said, every human has the capacity to distinguish between what is good or bad for the city and it is something that came since a person was born with their natural instinct. They just need the practice and that is the public education that in the city is implemented with virtues. Aristotle is also concerned that human beings are not perfect, or excellent, or always be good, a person can be bad also and it is the natural sense of life. “It follows that there cannot be a single excellence common to all the citizens” (Aristotle 92). Aristotle studies the human behavior in order to create this functional constitution with the needs of the people and the weakness of the human to heal every aspect…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another Ancient that makes the case that the regime or polis makes collective meaning, order, and justice possible is Livy. In his book, The Early History of Rome, Livy uses the history of Brutus to show the relationship between individuals in a polis and politics. Brutus’ political views tied directly with how he wanted Rome and its citizens to act and behave. He wanted to empower his citizens and give them strength during conflict or struggle. Brutus believed that if the people who occupy Rome are strong and powerful, Rome will also be. This is direct correlation to Aristotle in the fact that the polis and individuals who make it up are almost synonymous. This relationship is important in the fact that the model citizen in a regime and polis…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle a Greek philosopher born in Macedonia in 394 BC has different forms of viewing politics. He describes the polis, or city, as a koinonia, or political association, and he proclaims that all relations, like all thoughtful human acts, are shaped with the objective of accomplishing a particular good. He says that being part of a polis is the only way someone can be a part of a great life. Because politics are necessary for this Aristotle says, "Man is by nature a political animal."(Aristotle 90). As part of the books discussion of the economy a city-state needs, Aristotle defends the system of private property and argues against extreme capitalism and says that slavery is necessary in order for society to function and democracy as being…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I agree with Anthony J D’Angelo’s belief that “without a sense of caring there can be no sense of community”, because the an inclusive environment is cultivated by people and their involvement. In other words, the sense of community is formed by the people's interest or care towards the subject,movement, idea, or organization and its members. People's actions propagate similar, but varied beliefs and grow ideas into movements.…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aquinas Vs Hobbes

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages

    One of Aristotle’s most prominent teachings in “Politics,” is the interpretation of the state of nature. “It is evident that the state is a creation of nature, and that man is by nature a political animal.” (I. 2. 153a.) From this statement, it is clear that human beings are innately political, regardless of the setting they are in. One example he gives to support his argument is that the hand of a body is similar to an individual of a city. This analogy demonstrates the relation of one functioning part that is attached to the whole and complete functioning system. A functional hand is only used when the entire body is operating correctly. Similarly, the city is comprised of multiple individuals each with specific duties to create a collection of different parts with different functions, all working simultaneously together for the city. The goal is to pursue the common good of the city, even when it conflicts with one’s self-interest. The common good gives people the opportunity to reach the highest form of virtue and requires the whole community. Another example…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The life in Ancient Israel was based on covenants and spiritual loyalty to the god which led to the unequal leadership of a single person. Aristotle perceived such leadership as insufficient since he thrived on an idea of Polis, in other words, a perfect community of households in which all individuals had a purpose. Likewise, Aristotle considered the involvement and purpose of citizens to be detrimental for having a prosperous nation. However, the people of Ancient Israel were ignorant in terms of economy, leadership and self-government and they needed an individual to preside over them.…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lastly, one of the many well-known philosophers in history, is Aristotle (384 BC - 322 BC), who believed in more of a natural institution. Aristotle was heavily influenced by Plato, but disagreed with some aspects of his philosophy. However, Aristotle agreed with Plato’s theory, in which humans are political animals, but what sets humans different from animals, is that humans can reason. Hence, this forces people to live according to their reason rather than their passions. The downside of this ideology, is that the thoughts on a particular topic one would have, would be significantly different from other people, thus there reasoning on what is just and unjust can also be different. As a result, if a leader cannot distinguish the wrong in an unjust act, society would not be able to protect people from evil individuals, resulting in a dangerous society to live in. Moving on, Aristotle thought humans fall into one of three…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ‘The state (as defined by Max Weber) is an organisation that successfully claims a monopoly of the legitimate use of force in a given territory.’- the state‘s authority may be backed by violence if necessary. ‘Territory is clearly central to Webers definition - the state claims to be dominant within a defined territory or within a country’s borders.’…

    • 1629 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In many ways, the way political economists, and by extension, many of the rest of us, think about economic inequality today is influenced by what Aristotle wrote about economic inequality almost two and half millenia ago. In and of itself, this is somewhat remarkable. But more importantly, Aristotle’s idea that the problem with economic inequality is that the poor, if they gain power, will soak the rich remains both pervasive and persuasive. On this reading of Aristotle, economic inequality is ‘bad’ because it provides an incentive for the poor to upset the equilibrium of a political community. While this line of thought can certainly be found in the Politics, in the next section I argue that it represents only a part of Aristotle’s thinking.22…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pericles Quotes

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “An Athenian Citizen does not neglect the state because he takes care of his own…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle Virtue Ethics

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The philosophy of virtue ethics, which primarily deals with the ways in which a person should live, has puzzled philosophers from the beginning of time. There are many contrasting interpretations regarding how one should live his or her life in the best way possible. It is in my opinion that the Greeks, especially Aristotle, have exhibited the most logical explanation of how to live the "good life". The following paper will attempt to offer a detailed understanding of Aristotle's reasoning relating to his theory of virtue ethics.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The people were the basis of power for the state, and could act to force change on the government if the social contract was not being upheld (APUS, 1). This social contract differed in terms between Locke and Aristotle, but they were similar in content, protection of liberty and from harm. These are fundamental rights that cannot be taken away or suppressed, if they are, the people had the duty to force change on the state. The people then were the central focus to both men, and had a responsibility to both themselves and to the society to make the best decisions, based on their moral reason and the assessment of their…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays