Preview

Aristotle's Politics: Oligarchy and Democracy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1952 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Aristotle's Politics: Oligarchy and Democracy
In Aristotle's Politics, he focuses much on the regimes of an oligarchy and of a democracy. Democracies exists when the free and poor, being a majority, have authority to rule, and have an equal share in the city. Oligarchies exists when the few wealthy and better born have authority and grant benefits in proportion to a person's wealth (1280a:10-30;1290a:5-10). Within each regime, there are the farmer, the working element and craftsmen, the marketing element and traders, the laboring element, the warrior element, the priests (Aristotle skips this sixth element but suggests this possibility), the rich, and the magisterial (1290b:40; 1291a:5-35). Within regimes are two distinctive classes and forms of government which are the well off and the poor. While the well off are few and the poor are many, these parts of the city oppose the other. Regimes are instituted accordingly on the basis of the sorts of preeminence associated with these which holds to be two sorts of regimes: democracy and oligarchy (1291b:5-10). Within the two regimes, there are several kinds of both the people and of the notables. Within the people there are the famers, those engaged in the arts, the marketing element, the element connected with the sea, the menial elements having little property, and the free element. Within the notables there are kinds distinguished by wealth, good birth, virtue, education, and whatever is spoken of as based on the same sort of difference as these (1291b:20-30). Aristotle defines five different kinds of democracy. First, everyone is equal by law regardless of wealth and majority rules. Second, there is a modest minimum property qualification to hold public office. Third, only the nobly born hold public office, but the law rules. Fourth, anyone can hold public office, but the law rules. Lastly, anyone can hold public office and the multitude rules, not the law. The last form is vulnerable to becoming a demagoguery of the majority

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Democritus was a Greek Philosopher born 460 B.C. in the city of Abdera, and died 370 B.C. He was born into a wealthy family and traveled the world extensively. He was known as the “laughing” philosopher, or the “happy” philosopher because he would constantly mock people, and laugh incessantly about his own jibes. Throughout his life he wrote over 70 books, however very few pages have survived the years. Some have said that Democritus blinded himself to better understand his own mind,however, because he had over 70 writings these conceptions of Democritus have been discredited. Democritus studied natural philosophy under his mentor Leucippus, who had a huge affect on Democritus's writings and publications as they were very similar to Leucippus own theories. It is difficult to distinguish whose theories belonged to who because very few documents have survived. However Democritus has been credited with most of them. His major contributions to science is his atomic theory,which was the basis on which modern atomic theory was developed.(http://www.iep.utm.edu/democrit/)…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2. Many of our terms for describing the distribution of political power are derived from the ancient Greeks, who were the first Western people to study politics systematically. A society in which political decisions were controlled by a small group was called an oligarchy, meaning rule by a few members of the elite, who generally benefited themselves. Another form of rule by the few was known as aristocracy, meaning rule by the most virtuous, the most talented, or the best suited to the position. Later in European history, aristocracy meant rule by the titled or the upper classes. In contrast to such a top-down form of control was the form known as anarchy, or the condition of no government. Anarchy exists when each individual makes his or her own rules for behavior, and there are no laws and no…

    • 4516 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    With an increase of vicious infighting amongst the aristocratic families, and the lack of social and political equality, tyranny began to emerge in Archaic Greece. Although tyranny is often seen negatively, the tyrants in the sixth and seventh century were popular and had the support of the citizens. This was due to the fact that the “aristocratic families were frequently violent and highly disruptive in society” (Pomeroy, Burstein, Donlan, Roberts, 1999, p. 107). Factious and ambitious individuals in the aristocracy often brought about struggles for power within their ranks. The aristocrats were seemingly unpopular during this period as they refused political equality to the landless traders and manufactures (Langer, 1952, p. 62). The peasants were oppressed by the aristocrats and fell into debt, which eventually led to slavery or exile. With the disaffection with the oligarchic rule, the citizens of Archaic Greece were supportive of the tyrants who were opposed to the aristocrats. They were also “willing to follow any leader who offered them a new deal” (Green, 1973. p. 69). As Aristotle stated, “A tyrant is set up from among the dēmos and the multitude to oppose the notable so that the people may suffer no injustice from them.” (Pomeroy et al., 1999, p. 108). As the friction between the aristocratic families became more violent, and the social and political issues became more adamant, tyrants established themselves in the polis due to popular support of its citizens.…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The people of Athens obtain the right to participate in public life through political reforms over the years; as at first only the wealthy few participated in public life. During the archaic period (around 800-500 BCE) power was only in the hands of the established wealthy landowning aristocratic class. Henceforth, the majority of the population were marginalized by the wealthy landowning class. This marginalization created resentment among the non wealthy class; and the resentment lead to social unrest that ultimately lead to Athens democracy system where all qualified citizens (and not just the wealthy) can vote. The developing democracy system was still rigged by the aristocrats “so that the majority (poorer classes) could not outvote the…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Several Greek city-states had the government form of an oligarchy, where the small group of people wield the ruling power. They were considered the highest class as political power was shared amongst the group (Carr). The groups were formed based off of aristocratic birth or wealth (Carr). Unlike this class, the lower class citizens in the oligarchy did not share the same rights as they lacked full political rights and were not eligible to rule (Carr). They are thus excluded from voting or having any type of say for any political decision for the city-state Furthermore, the right to vote or to be eligible for power was based off of wealth in this government form. In contrast to this government for his city-state lived under, Aristotle explores…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Government: There were three different types of Governments called Democracy, Monarchy, and Oligarchy. Democracy means, a government owned by people, or assemble. Administrators and leaders were voted and every citizen had a say. Monarchy is a non-married ruler like a king. In Athens a non-married ruler was called a Tyrant. Oligarchy is when the government is managed by a small group of people.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ancient Athenians had used an oligarchic constitution; it was not a good era to be stricken with poverty. The aristocrats dominated the peasants, so much so that the peasants were dependent on them. The poor worked the fields of the rich for a portion of the harvest, and if the rent was not met, their wives and children were seized in order to pay it off.…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After this, Socrates goes on to show that there are four types of regimes, listed in the order of most just to least just: aristocracy, timocracy, oligarchy, democracy and tyranny. Then he goes on to say how each develops from the other, and why each is just and/or unjust. Similarly, the men from each era represent the amount of justice in their souls. This in turn proves that the just man is happier than the unjust man.…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Democracy and Aristocracy often go hand in hand as they did in ancient Athens and were different than all the other systems. Not unlike how the United States’ education and social system unwittingly creates a form of aristocracy based on wealth, Athens’ democratic power was coupled with aristocracy ensuring the elected were those of wealthy families. This system was shown through ‘500 bushel men,’ ‘horse men,’ and ‘200 bushel men.’ This was not vastly different from the oligarchy in Sparta as their system also had much to do with wealth and social status; their weak monarchies were allowed on the Gerousia despite their age. However, Sparta was not a Monarchy because of the kings’ limited power. Monarchy and tyranny, not withstanding, did exist in Greece.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Democracy Dbq

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the world many societies are switching to democracies from the demand from the people in that area. One of the first democracies ever was in Athens, Greece. Even though they were the first democracy ever assembled, questions arose as to how democratic they really were. Opinions vary, but although Athens became more democratic over time, because of a series of reforms, it still was still more un-democratic then democratic. Therefore there power was too limited to be considered a true democracy due to the fact that poor people didn’t participate in government, and that only a small amount of people were considered citizens. In order to further analyze the issue, we can ask poor people their thoughts and their participation in government. Another source would be written history of the city, so they can see if the people were more satisfied under a democracy or a non-democratic state.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle truly believed that politics was a science that could be understood in the same way as anatomy or physics. Because of that he wrote this book to help people create a better more stable state. He starts by explaining the way in which a household is like a small state and clarifying the rules that must be put into place in regards to women, children and slaves all of which he seen as less than people with purpose. After dealing with this he begins his description of the different types of states, which he divides into six main primary forms. The first three that he would describe as proper states are monarchy, aristocracy and constitutional government. After that he describes the three corrupted forms as tyranny, oligarchy, and democracy. Monarchy is when one person who is the best in the state rules under the law for the sake of his citizens. This government though is often corrupted into tyranny where one person through strength holds his equals or betters below himself for his own benefit. Aristocracy is when the people who are above average join together to wisely run the state so that it might prosper. Often though it degrades into oligarchy where the power is all in the hands of a few who use the power to try maintain their position. Constitutional government is when people willingly submit to wise laws, which are put together to help the state. Democracy is its corrupted form…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Separation of Powers

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “The ancient political philosophers, particularly Aristotle, believed that a successful republic could best be achieved through a mixed constitution (also called a mixed government), whereby power would be divided among a sovereign, a legislature, and the aristocracy. Politically, this entailed the separation of powers into distinct branches of government so that one branch could prevent another from tyrannizing the majority. The tendency toward despotism and corruption, in other words, would be limited because of the checks placed on power.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Ancient Grecian culture there were various political systems in use depending on the city or Poleis. Today we shall take a look at the following systems monarchy, aristocracy, tyranny, oligarchy, and democracy, there were some others but these will be our focus. Interestingly enough while we think of ancient Athens as being a democracy it wasn't always so, it eventually evolved into a democratic nation, but between the 8th to 6th century, Athens was ruled by aristocracy and according to The Athenian Aristocracy (n.d), the constitution read as follows “Appointment to the supreme offices of state went by birth and wealth; and they were held at first for life, and after wards for a term of ten years. (Athenian Constitution 3.1)” Aristocratic families ruled and most of the Athenian citizens had no say in the rules that governed their everyday life.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ancient Greek Government

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The first form of government I will discuss is a monarchy. Monarchies are not as common as some of the other forms of government in ancient Greece. A monarchy has a single ruler (like a tyranny). The difference between a monarchy and a tyranny is that the head of a monarch receives his power through religion, it is believed…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Democracy first appeared in Ancient Greek civilisations, before being wiped out entirely and not returning to western civilisations only until approximately a hundred years ago. One definition given for democracy is a political system that allows the constituents and citizens of a country the right to fairly vote and contribute to the decision of which individuals are ruling and are the governing power. Not only that but also provides citizens protection from the state1. Another definition is given by Abraham Lincoln, in which democracy is viewed as being a "government of the people, for the people, by the people”2. Democracy is often seen as a Western invention, but has now spread across to countries all across the globe, and is seen as the most advanced and fair political ruling system to date. I will be assessing whether or not democracy is the best possible political system, where its faults lie and where it can improve.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays