Preview

Aristotle's Artistic Proofs as Applied to the "Declaration of War" Speech by Franklin D. Roosevelt

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1885 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Aristotle's Artistic Proofs as Applied to the "Declaration of War" Speech by Franklin D. Roosevelt
Francheska Sanchez
Professor Mary Mathis
ENGL 101C-H1
November 2, 2006
Aristotle 's Artistic Proofs as Applied to the "Declaration of War" Speech by Franklin D. Roosevelt
Aristotle, although having lived thousands of years ago, continues to make an impact in our society with his contribution to Western thinking and his famous "art" of rhetoric. He remains to this day, one of the most influential philosophers in the history of rhetorical study. One of his most prominent works is his "Rhetoric", a book that "confronts scholars with several perplexing questions" (Herrick 74). "Rhetoric" is divided into three books that discuss the "domains of rhetoric, the rhetorical proofs that Aristotle is so famous for and matters of style and arrangement" (Herrick 74). One of the most important contributions of Aristotle 's "Rhetoric" is his idea of artistic proofs, which are used to persuade an audience. Since developed in the fourth century BC, these proofs still continue to be utilized by rhetoricians to this day through the Aristotelian method. There are three components that comprise the artistic proofs. These are "(1) logical reasoning (logos), (2) the names and causes of various human emotions (pathos), and (3) human character and goodness (ethos)" (Herrick 82). Although all parts of his work are instrumental to rhetoricians and scholars everywhere, I will focus on the profound impact of Aristotle 's "artistic proofs" to the art of rhetoric and use Franklin D. Roosevelt 's December 8, 1941 "Declaration of War" speech as an example of how they 're put into practice as a persuasive mechanism in today 's postmodern society.
Roosevelt used the artistic proofs in his emotionally charged speech to persuade the nation that it was worth going to war with Japan. He used all three rhetorical components in his rhetoric. Within the speech were (1) a concise and logical argument, (2) an appeal to the emotions of the people by Roosevelt, and (3) his credibility as the President



Cited: Herrick, James. "Aristotle Rhetoric". The History and Theory of Rhetoric. Needham Heights: MA, 2001. 74-84. "Pearl Harbor Attack". The 2000 Encyclopedia Britannica. 21 Oct. 2006. . Roosevelt, Franklin D. "Pearl Harbor Address to the Nation". / "Declaration of War" speech". American Rhetoric. 21 Oct. 2006. .

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Athenian Oath is intended to be the first thing you see when you enter the Maxwell School of Citizenship. The glow of the shiny letters strike you as a bronze statue of George Washington in-between the text faces the door. The purpose for both the text and the statue is that it is supposed to define citizenship and show what the founding principle the Maxwell school established itself from. However, when further analyzing both the text and the scenery that it is presented on, it is clear that there are multiple rhetorical devices at play in the presentation of this message. The first is the context of the Athenian oath.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Throughout President Franklin Roosevelt’s Pearl Harbor speech, he uses various devices to appeal to the audience listening. Although, the most effective excerpt from the speech is when President Roosevelt depicts the resilience and determination of the United States to fight back, both figuratively and metaphorically, “With confidence in our armed forces - with the unbounding determination of our people - we will gain the inevitable triumph - so help us God” (paragraph 17). By accentuating the unity of the nation with “our” armed forces and “our” people, Mr. President utilizes both pathos and parallelism. Pathos is exerted by the use of the pronouns “our” and “we”, in which Roosevelt includes himself with the rest of the Americans involved…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, Franklin D. Roosevelt did a truly amazing job addressing both the nation and Congress because he did not focus on only one audience. He clearly addresses both audiences when he says, “I believe that I interpret the will of the Congress and of the people...” he takes both opinions into consideration. By doing this Roosevelt gives equal importance to the nation and to Congress, which helps him get a positive response from both audiences. This shows that he successfully informed the nation and Congress about the war and both audiences understood. He accomplished two things at once because by addressing both audiences in one speech he shows that he had them both in mind. He did not include the kind of language that the nation would not understand just because he was talking to congress. Also he did not deliver the speech on a manner that would not be appropriate for Congress he used just the right language that would be understood by both audiences.…

    • 644 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Of the modes of persuasion furnished by the spoken word there are three kinds. The first kind depends on the personal character of the speaker; the second on putting the audience into a certain frame of mind; the third on the proof, or apparent proof, provided by the words of the speech itself.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dialectic Vs Rhetoric

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Page

    One more prominent figure in the classical history of rhetoric is Plato (428-347 B.C). Plato believed that the purpose of philosophy was to discover truth that should be independent of any special calculation of interest; he was suspicious of rhetoric because he thought it lacked any concern with a truth that was separate from the speaker’s interest. An opposition therefore developed in the classical period between rhetoric and dialectic (1), dialectic gave equal weight to both sides of an argument, while rhetoric was concerned with persuasion from a particular perspective rather than presenting a balanced point of view. For Plato, rhetoric was deceptive, because it only showed a perspective that fitted with the speaker’s point of view.…

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Exceptional persuasive writings must contain a well executed use of Aristotle’s Rhetorical Appeals ethos, logos, and pathos. Patrick Henry’s “Speech in the Virginia Convention” and Benjamin Franklin’s “Speech in the Convention” are two tremendous examples of these appeals, however, Patrick Henry’s speech is the better of the two. In his speech, Henry is trying to convince the convention that war must be declared against Great Britain. Meanwhile, the context of Franklin’s speech is that he is giving his support of the Constitution. Henry’s speech uses logos and pathos better than Franklin’s speech does, although Franklin uses ethos better than Henry. Since Henry uses two of the three appeals more effectively, his speech is superior.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nevertheless, readers and scholars alike continue to study these antiquity pieces into the modern age. Despite of their clashing prospects, the two share a commonality in that they both contain entheymatic arguments that which engage the emotions of their audiences to persuade them into believing their appointed arguments. By examining how each writer, Chief Seattle and John Locke structured their works in relation to the appeal of their intended audience, this paper will show how Chief Seattle’s ‘Speech to the U.S President’ proves to be the more effective enthymematic argument rather than John Locke’s ‘Of Property’. This claim will be supported through Aristotle’s definition and favor of the enthymeme as a crucial feature in the study of rhetoric. By means of Aristotle’s of description of the enthymeme and critical analysis of each work, evidence will validate that Chief Seattle’s speech proves to be the most…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetoric is the art of discourse. In some specific situations, it is an art to improve the capability of writers or speakers expression. It could help people to reach the purpose of inform, persuade, and motivate with the particular audiences. As a significant subject of formal study, rhetoric has played a crucial role in the Western tradition in the past many decades. There are two famous people—Plato and Aristotle that have made huge contributions on developing Rhetoric and delivering the concept of rhetoric from different perspectives. As comparing the view of Aristotle and Plato on rhetoric, it obvious that Aristotle builds on Plato’s views to some extent;…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Donald Trump Rhetoric

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Famous philosopher and poet, Aristotle, once described, “[rhetoric] may be defined as the faculty of observing in any given case the available means of persuasion. This is not a function of any other art.” Thus, rhetoric is a form of clear, perceptible language which leads its observers to make a specific and calculated conclusion. Many consider politicians to be the most avid users of rhetoric, constantly trying to convince audiences to vote or certain way or to shift the national political agenda in a direction that fits their means. In many cases, politicians are accused of being liars or untruthful for doing so. Contrary, others consider politicians to be masters of languages, constantly formulating methods to make their arguments more…

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fdr Infamy Speech

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On December 8, 1941 President Roosevelt addressed the nation. The Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor. President Roosevelt’s demeanor from the start of his speech set the tone for the entire final portion. The opening sentence was given slowly and…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bibliography: Antonello, P. and R. Farneti. "Antigone 's Claim: A Conversation with Judith Butler.” Theory &…

    • 3041 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    References: Aristotle. Rhetoric [On rhetoric. A theory of civic discourse] (2007) (G. A. Kennedy Trans.). (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.…

    • 4331 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Albert Einstein Speech

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Albert Einstein uses the rhetoric device logos to make his argument much more effective to his audience. For example “ General fear and anxiety creates hatred and aggressiveness.” Using diction he is able to better describe an often seen human reaction. The words “ anxiety” and “aggressiveness” are used effectively and really allows the audience to see and make the connection of the logic used in the argument presented. Also the use of foreshadowing can be seen as he uses this quote to setup for the important, bigger picture later in the speech. Einstein’s use of logos through diction provides an excellent use of rhetoric.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Classical Arguement

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The chapter, “Visual Rhetoric: Images as Arguments,” uses a wide variety of idea to help supports different claims. It gives quotes, images, and comparisons to help a writer give credibility to their claim. I chose a quote by Napoleon Bonaparte to help persuade my readers. He is a famous conqueror from history, which gives his appeal to men credibility. He had to persuade thousands to fight and die for him, so I can use his words to help sell hair products. It also appeals to emotions which is part of the same claim I used in the paper.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Four naval ships, Mount Rushmore, Teddy bears, eight movies including the Night at the Museum series, and one of the best turn-based strategy games, Civilization 6. All these things are forever linked by one man, Theodore Roosevelt. Throughout his life, he displayed numerous leadership traits that unquestionably prove he was a Visionary and Ethical Leader not only in battle, but also in his political career. The specific traits covered in this paper will touch on his use of inspirational motivation during his “crowned hour”, his use of diversity during his political appointments, his refusal to worry over image when carrying out his duties, and how he used intellectual empathy when preparing his men for…

    • 1882 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays