Arguments Against Zoos
The general topic of discussion among scholars is that the health of zoo animals in Britain needs specific attention as a way to counter the increasing push for the banning of zoos. Most scholars tend to specifically address the causes of low health of zoo animals. The most common causes addressed are visitor interactions, types of enclosures, and a lack of opportunities for wild behavior. There are scholars such as G.R. Hosey and Gareth Davey who both feel that zoo visitors have a strong impact on animals’ health. Davey argues that visitors inflict high stress on the animals, but that the measure of the stress depends on a multiplicity of variables including type of animal, person and surrounding environment (Hosey). Davey, in contrast, argues
…show more content…
Scholars G.R. Hosey and Gareth Davey seem to overlook how the effect of zoo visitors could be turned positive as well as what is needed to stop the negative interactions between visitors and the animals. They do not cover the importance of governmental regulation on Britain zoos in order to make certain that they are meeting the minimum animal welfare standards. However, Paul Koene addresses how the prevention of the opportunity to act naturally has no effect on zoo animal health without considering animals that were not raised in the zoo but placed there further into adulthood. Each of these arguments contain gaps that lack information and other views of the issue. Scholars Chris Draper, William Browne, and Stephen Harris fill these gaps in their own research as they display their argument on the unsuccess of formal inspections in Britain zoos in regulating whether or not they meet welfare requirements. The research of these men not only covers all examined causes of low zoo animal health, but also narrows in on the originator of the issue: the lack of solid and strongly enforced rules and regulations. As successfully expressed in the research of these intellectuals, the laws and rules regarding Britain zoo animal welfare standards need to be better enforced and supervised
Scholars G.R. Hosey and Gareth Davey seem to overlook how the effect of zoo visitors could be turned positive as well as what is needed to stop the negative interactions between visitors and the animals. They do not cover the importance of governmental regulation on Britain zoos in order to make certain that they are meeting the minimum animal welfare standards. However, Paul Koene addresses how the prevention of the opportunity to act naturally has no effect on zoo animal health without considering animals that were not raised in the zoo but placed there further into adulthood. Each of these arguments contain gaps that lack information and other views of the issue. Scholars Chris Draper, William Browne, and Stephen Harris fill these gaps in their own research as they display their argument on the unsuccess of formal inspections in Britain zoos in regulating whether or not they meet welfare requirements. The research of these men not only covers all examined causes of low zoo animal health, but also narrows in on the originator of the issue: the lack of solid and strongly enforced rules and regulations. As successfully expressed in the research of these intellectuals, the laws and rules regarding Britain zoo animal welfare standards need to be better enforced and supervised