Preview

Arguments Against Trophy Hunting

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1575 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Arguments Against Trophy Hunting
According to a Wall Street Journal article, Africa’s elephant population dropped more than 30% from 2007 to 2014 due to poaching and trophy hunting (Anderson). That means over 100,000 elephants were killed in seven short years. Trophy hunting is when hunters kill animals for money, bragging rights, and their own greed. This can cause drops in population or affect the ways animals survive. Even though it is major and causes so many problems, trophy hunting is looked past as if it is not an issue. Trophy hunting should be illegal because it depletes animal populations, reduces tourism, and is inhumane.
People who oppose this idea believe that hunting helps to raise the population of the species. Former Executive Director and President of the
…show more content…
It makes wildlife an asset to local communities, which secures survival of at-risk species” (Anderson). They say if hunting is done within reason, it shows how valuable the species is and can raise awareness to save them. However, this just makes it more likely for people to want to kill them for their own needs as they now know what it can be used for. For example, according to English Archbishop William Booth, elephant’s ivory can be worth over $200 a kilogram and is in high demand (Booth). Once hunters know this, they will only want to kill the elephants more. Another reason they support trophy hunting is because they think it is inevitable no matter what they do. Teacher and author Terry Hanmer writes, “Humans are not the only enemies animals have and all animals do not always get along” (Hanmer 53). Animals prey on each other more than humans hunt, so the humans believe that their hunting does not matter as much. While this may be true, hunting animals is not a natural process and it can affect their way of life by killing their leaders and ruining their environment. For instance, in a pack of wolves, killing the alpha wolf affects every wolf. In 77% of of cases studied, a pack dissolved because their leader was killed. When a pack …show more content…
In a recent poll 100 people were asked “Should trophy hunting and poaching of all animals be illegal?”. More than ¾ of those people responded with yes. Many said they thought it was cruel to kill animals and some were worried about the extinction of the species (Lundie). There is not a “humane” method of killing… many land animals face fatal injuries causing them to suffer for many days rather than killing them instantly (Gunn). Thinking it is more moral, many hunters only injure the animal to get what they want instead of killing them. That animal will have to learn to survive with any injury they face, but most will not survive. When an animal is injured, it is harder for them to take proper care of their children and make sure they are alive too, meaning they might die as well. Additionally, in a Wall Street Journal article, Terry L. Anderson asks the reader to “picture dozens of elephants with their tusks, ears, and feet dismembered… left to die” (Anderson). These elephants are torn apart for their body parts and are left to die. Elephants grieve very similarly to humans. They shed actual tears, hold funerals, and some have even died from the grief of family or friends dying. When an elephant in their herd dies, they surround it and sway together, crying. The deaths of these elephants affect the other elephants so much.Furthermore, as an expert informs, “Tusks are the elephant’s teeth — it extends into the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    It’s important to recognize how much of this goes on because animals play an important role in our world. To make them suffer even more than they already have to is outrageous. “Inhumane Suffering One of the most controversial aspects of hunting is the prospect that an animal may be suffering from a long and painful death,” one article says while talking about this specific issue. It comes to show that animals are greatly affected when hunters kill them. Another article heavily discusses Cecil’s death saying, “the killing of Cecil has sparked an international outcry and a backlash against big game trophy hunting.” Cecil was a lion in Zimbabwe who was the hot topic for his death and is the perfect example of the suffering of animals because he was one of many animals who experienced a death from this…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hunters obey the laws enacted to protect the animals including game and non game animals. Hunters respect the animal they are hunting. It is fair chase and the animal becomes food for the Hunter and his/her family. Like it or not, we by nature are predators. AS of nowhunters, are the most efficient way to keep animal population under control. Since we have intruded into the animals area, there is less room and natural food for large populations. Larger populations means disease and hunger. Poachers kill animals illegally. They do not obey the laws. They kill for profit because some PEOPLE like to buy the tusk, furs, etc of non game and protected animals. Don't put the blame on Hunters, but the buisness owners that finance the Poachers with their illegal…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many majestic animals have been the targets for poachers, and poachers, being the dumb people they are, don’t know the difference between animals they can and can’t hunt, and end up making them extinct! Hunting is interfering with nature, and at this rate, we will continue to make many species extinct! Some may see hunting as a way of removing overpopulated animals, but there are none of those right now! Hunting not only hurts animals, but it will end up hurting ourselves as well!…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When we think of a worldwide catastrophe, we usually think of earthquakes, ice age, and nuclear war. But one that should be recognized with much more severity is poaching. As international editor Richard Swift observed; “We are pushing a hundred species a day, four species an hour, into evolutionary oblivion”. Hunting and capturing animals has been practiced even before recorded history. Where this can be understandable to most in a survival perspective, there are people in this world who abuse this action and slaughter animals for other disrespectful reasons or no reason at all. This is identified as poaching and it should indisputably come to an end.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Benefits Of Hunting

    • 2943 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Hunting is a practice which has thrived through the centuries from the beginning of man to modern day civilizations. When the first colonists sailed to these lands and established the America that we know today, hunting was a skill they needed to master very quickly in order to survive. Since that time, hunting has sprouted a multi-billion dollar industry, fueled by millions of Americans who continue the tradition. Hunting has emerged as an outdoor sport, enjoyed by many. Like all sports, hunting has its brands, idols, and traditions. It has its rules and regulations, and penalties for not following them. Yet, unlike most other sports, hunting has a significant opposition from millions of people and groups across the nation. It’s argued that…

    • 2943 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Benefits Of Hunting Essay

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Public debates about trophy hunting often centers on the question of the morality of recreational hunting or the extent to which the money paid by sportsmen seeking a trophy animal provides a conservation benefit to the overall population of game animals and the rural economies where the game is hunted. Bears, cougars, deer, foxes, and other animals who are chased, trapped, and even killed by dogs during hunts are not the only ones to suffer from this variant of the “sport.” Hunting for fun destroys property and injure or kill horses, cows, dogs, cats, hikers, and other hunters (Trophy…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Many of the animals are so tame that people can walk right up to them. They have no chance.” States Lena Masr. These animals have been have been raised around people knowing nothing about getting shot, so when they actually trust someone the trust gets taken away along with the animals lives. If exotic hunting were to be a thing it should at least be in Africa where the animals can run and attempt to get away from killed and/ or harmed. Lara Logan states “A Texas hunting ranch is not the same as being in a reserve in Sagal.” ”The future for Oryx’s is Africa… not Texas.” Hunters waste so much money paying to hunt animals, however if people were to hunt they should be hunting in Africa where the animals can run away rather than being trapped in a cage. If anything hunting a caged animal is pointless, “People who kill them are cowardly.” Exclaims Lena Mesri, hunting these animals or any animals in general is pointless unless it is for survival purposes or any other logical…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hunting Research Paper

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Hunting is a common activity all around the world, and if performed properly, can have many benefits to us and the rest of the planet. The art of hunting has been around since the beginning of time. Living off of the land used to be a necessity across the world, until the mass production of food came along. In America, people do not usually need to hunt to survive. However, the population of animal species needs to be controlled. Too many of one type of animal can cause a drastic change to any ecosystem. Food supplies decline quickly, leaving many animals without food. Hunting can help keep the population of a group of animals at a good number, making the lives of the other species easier. Hunters and fishermen are some of the most prominent demographic groups, and have an annual economic contribution of $70 billion (Eaton). Taxes from this also benefit the habitat by funding wildlife control (Gibbons). Hunting contains many positive effects on the world and the things living in it. Some people have negative views on this activity, but the amount of positive affects it has on society overbears the negative ones.…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics of Hunting

    • 1723 Words
    • 5 Pages

    To my family, and myself, the idea of hunting means that food is going to be on the dinner table. It means that we are going to kill an animal, butcher it ourselves, and eventually eat the meat of our harvest. It is an appreciation of the wild animals; the ones placed on this Earth to roam the hills and graze the grass, rather than the ones grown in barns and factories. It means utilizing every part of that animal to our best ability, and wasting nothing. We even go as far as to donate the brain and heart of the deer to the local high school for use of dissection in science laboratories. We appreciate the animal in every way we can. It has given us everything (literally) that it has, and we will respect this animal for a time far longer after it’s depart from Earth.…

    • 1723 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Cecil the Lion Killed By American Dentist” was the headline that rekindled the controversial debate over trophy hunting. This debate is better represented by Goodwell Nzou’s article “In Zimbabwe We Don’t Cry For Lions” than in the passage by Alexis Crosswell “5 Reasons Why Trophy Hunting is Not Conservation.” Trophy hunting is the killing of animals specifically for the purpose of keeping a portion of the animal as a prize. Since the death of Cecil the Lion, the sport has come under significant fire from the media and sparked heated argument. Nzou has the stronger argument than Crosswell’s specifically because: it recognizes that humans personify deadly animals, the writer of “In Zimbabwe We Don’t Cry For Lions” has personal experience with the subject and that Goodwell Nzou explains that American priorities are more concerned with animals than starving people.…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To do our part in keeping balance to the populations we’ve offset. As Kristof put it “it’s an abdication of environmental responsibility to eliminate other predators and then refuse to assume the job ourselves. In that case, the collisions with humans will simply get worse.” I also found myself in compliance with Kristof’s assumption that people these days would look at hunting more as a barbaric action rather than a necessary one for ecological balance. Looking at both sides of the opinion of hunting in today’s society the authors makes it clear that he doesn’t expect the idea to make sense to people who may hold an ignorant stance when challenged with his proposal. Kristof was sure to include this when talking about where people may stand on this topic in an everyday life setting “Granted, hunting isn’t advisable in suburban backyards, and I don’t expect many soccer moms to install gun racks in their minivans.” I believe his humorous tone while explaining his opinion of the need to kill animals in to achieve positive environmental results is appropriate in the way he expresses the logical irony of his claim. A Claim made strong by ending it with a real example of how this problem can literally come crashing into our homes of not dealt with in the right way, the way the Author deemed as a logical…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hunting Should Be Allowed

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Hunting is beneficial to our society and therefore should be allowed. Historically human beings have been pursuing wild animals to provide their families with food, clothing, and shelter. In modern times the need for hunting for survival has lessened because of the development of animal husbandry and agriculture. There were times in history worldwide when hunting became profitable and hunters began killing animals for their fur, skins, and meat. Then it became necessary to put regulations in to effect to preserve wildlife as well as to somewhat appease the critics who felt hunting should be illegal. Three main reasons why hunting should be allowed is to regulate the amount of wild animals, so that areas do not become over populated by them. Another reason is that hunting is a major money making industry. The third main reason is that hunting for sport of food is an exciting and educational experience for hunters of all ages. In John Clare’s poem “The Badger” we see hunting at its worst and a major turnoff due to the unethical and cruel nature of the townspeople engaged in the hunt. Poems like these motivate people to be anti-hunting but if we look closely at the benefits of hunting it overrides such negativity and we can plainly see the benefits.…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hunting can be used in many different ways that all have a positive effect on the environment. Hunting is helpful in many positive ways to keep the environment clean and healthy. Hunting has been used since the beginning of time and has always been here. Throughout the years, there have been many different groups of people that are pro-hunting and many different groups that have been against hunting. Since hunting began, many of the people who are pro-hunting has kept the environment clean and healthy. Hunting has many positive effects on the environment that are beneficial. Some of these benefits include but are not limited to the large economic benefit to the wildlife conservation through hunting equipment taxes, hunting license sales, and usage fees. Other benefits of hunting is all the money that is spent yearly by hunters on equipment, hunting trips, and guide services. Hunters also contribute highly to keeping the environment clean and healthier by donating and contributing large sums of time and money to hunter run conservation groups that work to help increase natural wildlife habitats and populations (Hunting Benefits 1). An environment that is considered to be “good” would be one that involves situations of activities that maintain wildlife at current levels. Which means hunting is positive for the environment because the hunting community helps ensure that the wildlife populations of all the different types of game is kept in good conditions and can be proven to survive from this generation to the next (Gibbons 1). This means that hunters have to keep a variety of natural habitats to be kept intact, unpolluted, and undisturbed by unnatural forces. All of which hunters support these efforts (Gibbons 1). Wildlife hunting in all aspects plays a major role in helping keep the environment as clean and natural as…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Doctoral student in molecular and cellular biosciences at Wake Forest University and member of the African Nzou clan, Goodwell Nzou, in his opinion contribution to the New York Times, effectively claims that trophy hunting is not as bad as Americans are making it out to be. First, he supports this claim by asserting that lions are considered killers in African villages. Nzou uses cause and effect to appeal to pathos when stating, “When I was 9 years old, a solitary lion prowled villages near my home. After it killed a few chickens, some goats and finally a cow, we were warned to walk to school in groups and stop playing outside. My sisters no longer went alone to the river to collect water or wash dishes; my mother waited for my father and older brothers, armed with machetes, axes and spears, to…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This article talks about the benefits of both the environment and the people themselves. It…

    • 2129 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics