Arguments Against Sharia Law

In terms of the legal ban of Sharia law. I think I’m leaning towards supporting the ban because the bill mentions that it should only be excluded from the legal courtroom setting as should not be used in forming legislative decisions. The bill does not infringe on being practicing from in the private sector and Muslims still have the opportunity to practice their beliefs in accordance to Sharia, it just can not be used in a court of law. Also I believe the ban may be more justified because it makes the Constitution the Supreme law of the law instead of specifically banning Sharia law. Unlike the Oklahoma Law, SQ 755, which specifically banned only Sharia law and was deemed unconstitutional because of how it was discriminatory against a specific religion. Based on certain things I have read and watched, it suggests that the two legal systems can not coexist and that many of their values infringe upon another. Therefore, suggesting to make the Constitution the supreme law of the land would clarify which rules to follow and which ones one should be held reliable to in a court of law and forming legislative decisions. With further readings, it appears An-Na’im
This source also addresses Muslim prejudices and how based on preconceived notions of Muslims and Islamic law could affect the way people seem about this law. Hussain also brings up the viewpoint of trying to assimilate other religious beliefs in with the law, such as Amish beliefs and separating from a school system. This outside viewpoint might bring information to the table so see what solution should be brought when dealing with Sharia law and hybrid solution to it. Lastly, this source will help because it gives support for how the first amendment can lead to culture profiling and how to balance the free exercise clause with protecting American