Arguments Against Occupy

A positive conclusion is that the demonstrations put the democratic globalization movement on journalists’ agendas (Rauch et al., 2007).
Looking at the legal ramifications, Occupy were protesting on private properties that they were not supposed to but they had the consent of the property owner. They were also exercising their first amendment rights by having press conferences, rallies or demonstrations on public streets, sidewalks, in front of city halls, and city parks. While demonstrating, an employer can't take actions against employee-protester. Certain items should not be brought, it's legal to take pictures and videos in public spaces. In NY chalking on sidewalk or wearing masks are not allowed.
Occupy was under surveillance by the