Preview

Arguments Against Juvenile Justice

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
564 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Arguments Against Juvenile Justice
Juveniles’ Justice There are times we hear of young children committing crimes. Crimes those are punishable by either life sentences or death row. Over the course of time society has been more compelled to find out why the child has acted out in such a malicious way. But before new psychological studies we have in our system children who have spent their life in prison over a bad choice or something that they could not control. Preceding the suggestion of juvenile-justice advocates the Supreme Court decided 6 to 3 this week in favor of Henry Montgomery, who was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole for killing a Baton Rouge deputy sheriff in 1963, when Montgomery was 17. Monday's verdict offers a chance of freedom for as many as 2,500 prisoners in a related situation. (McGrough) Throughout the United States of America, numerous of adolescents have been punished as …show more content…
Justice Anthony Kennedy said in his majority opinion: “Those prisoners who have shown an inability to reform will continue to serve life sentences. The opportunity for release will be afforded to those who demonstrate the truth of Miller’s central intuition — that children who commit even heinous crimes are capable of change.” (McGrough) Showing we can be comfortable with this assessment without adopting the credulous view that juvenile killers assume no accountability for their offenses because “my brain made me do it.” Clearly most minors don’t execute vicious crimes, and those who do must pay some price. Lessened amount for the realistic or ethical contemplation doesn’t mean any amount at all. Also, some killers who performed their crimes when they were young maintain to pose a risk to society decades later, and judges and parole boards can take that into

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Position paper

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Juvenile delinquency is becoming one of the most debatable subjects in the media not only in America but also all over the world. Some think that we must be severe with the youth that commit violent crime but others think that we should treat them as youngsters first, then as criminals. In “Adult Crime, Adult Time” attorney Linda J. Collier tries to convince the reader that young criminals are to be treated like adult criminals if they commit violent crimes. Timothy Roche and Amanda Bower in the article entitled “Young Voices from the Cell” defend a different point of view saying that young criminals should be treated as young people who suffer from psychological disorders. I disagree with Collier’s argument and I defend the idea and arguments discussed by Roche and Bower because I think that young criminals commit such atrocities because they are young and don’t realize the gravity of their acts, and because many of them suffered from psychological disorders that can be cured with therapies.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order for juveniles to fully understand the affects and consequences to what they have committed, adult sentencing is a better and effective consequence. This is because juvenile sentencing is too lenient for kids and youths who commit heinous crimes. For example, “little girls who rob a bank was given a 26-years-to-life prison term,”(56) stated Margie Lundstrom in “Kids Are Kids-Until They Commit Crimes”. The sentencing of 26 years to life was understandable because these were little girls committing a…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Juvenile Justice

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In recent discussion of Juvenile Justice, a controversial issue has been whether juveniles should be tried as adults in adult courts for heinous crimes they have committed. On one hand, some argue that they should not be tried as adults and do not deserve harsh sentences but as children seeking help. On the other hand, however, others argue that those who commit such heinous crimes ought to be punished no matter the age. The juvenile court was created to handle juvenile offenders on the basis of their youth rather than their crimes. The purpose of juvenile court is treatment and guidance rather than punishment. Juveniles don't have the knowledgeable or moral capacity to understand the consequences of their actions; similarly, they lack the same capacity to be trial defendants. Juveniles today are more knowledgeable and cultured at a younger age; they understand the implications of violence and how violent weapons are used. It is irrational to argue that a juvenile, who sees the effect of violence around him in the news every day, does not understand what killing really is. The fact that “adolescent killers” know how to load and shoot a gun or use a knife to kill is an indicator that they understand exactly what they're doing.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Juveniles Serving Life

    • 4252 Words
    • 18 Pages

    The issue of juveniles serving life sentences, for non homicide offenses, is becoming a recognizable problem in the state of Florida and across the country. This punishment became enacted within the federal, state, and local judicial system when courtrooms and prosecutors were given permission to utilize prosecutorial discretion when deciding to send a juvenile to an adult court. Supreme Court Justice Kennedy felt this process was wrong when he stated: “there is no statutory differentiation between adults and juveniles with respect to authorized penalties” (Re, R.M., 2011, p. 367).…

    • 4252 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juveniles who commit heinous crimes are capable of change, so convicting them as adults and giving them a life sentence doesn't allow them to do so. In Gail Garinger’s, “Juveniles Don't Deserve Life Sentences”, Garinger states the the 79 juveniles in the US who are convicted to a life sentence, are seen as unchangeable and no one cares what becomes of them. But from personal experiences of being a former judge, Garinger had see first hand the juvenile's capacity to turn themselves around. If a juvenile were to be convicted to die in prison, they would be never be given the opportunity to show their change. They should be given an opportunity to show their growth and maturity, but life in prison denies them that. Life in prison denies these young individuals the access to…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Juveniles have been incarcerated in secure facilities since 1974. Juveniles are committing more heinous crimes and citizens have advocated for tougher penalties on crime. They want justice for the violence perpetrated on their families, businesses and communities. The Juvenile Justice system is charged with simultaneously protecting the public as well as reforming those juveniles who are convicted and sentenced to secure facilities. Barry C. Feld (1995) believes that there is a “desire to "get tough," fueled in part by frustration with the intractability of crime, that provides political impetus to transfer some young offenders to criminal courts for prosecution as adults and to strengthen the sanctioning powers of juvenile courts”(p.966).…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juvenile Justice has been a prominent controversy in present day society. We can observe how the majority of crimes committed are being perpetrated by adolescents. The disputation arises on whether the Supreme Court justice should abolish mandatory life in prison for pubescents who commit the immorality of murder or authorize the punishment with parole. Although many can challenge this contrary issue, I concur with ideology of the Supreme Court ruling that juveniles who engage in murder could not be sentenced to life in prison due to the protection the 8th amendment granting defense from cruel and unusual punishment.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    German Singer Q’orianka Kilcher once stated this quote about juveniles. “I think it's important for us as a society to remember that the youth within juvenile justice systems are, most of the time, youths who simply haven't had the right mentors and supporters around them - because of circumstances beyond their control.” This quote approaches one of America’s biggest question about juvenile justice. Should minors who have committed heinous crimes against the American Society be tried like an adult and given punishments like life in prison? This question was answered in a Supreme Court ruling that stated juveniles couldn’t be sentenced life in prison because minors were still minors, regardless of their crimes. However, despite this ruling,…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At this time an estimated of 200,000 youth are sentenced, tried or incarcerated as adults every year across the United States, and nearly 10,000 youth is detained or incarcerated in adult jails and prisons. Some studies show that juveniles who are held in adult facilities are 38 times more likely to commit suicide and are at the risk of being sexual victimized. Do we really want that to happen in our prisons? And, if they are sexually victimize what makes us think that they won’t do it to others? In 2008, the Juvenile Department found that transferring young offenders to the adult criminal justice system does not protect the community and markedly increases the likelihood that young offenders will reoffend. (U.S. Department of Justice and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2014).…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Civil Injuction Process

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Before the modern era, youth who committed crimes in the Western world received no preferential treatment because of their age. These children were adjudicated, punished, and confined alongside adult offenders. In more recent years the juvenile justice system has maintained different priorities than those that exist in the adult criminal justice system. However, there are still many get tough advocates of law and order, many of whom are fed up with violent juvenile crime, that are increasingly questioning the philosophy that underlies the juvenile justice system in America. Many people call for harsher punishments while others call for better rehabilitation programs for youth offenders. This paper will focus on the differences between the adult and juvenile justice systems, and whether rehabilitation or incarceration is the best method to assist in reducing the juvenile crime rate and help today’s youth become contributing members of society.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    More than twenty years ago, youth violence reached an all-time high and America lost faith in its youth. Legislators across the United States responded to the crime spike by lowering the minimum age to be tried as an adult. Rehabilitation in juvenile facilities was no longer a valid option for violent offenders. Locking up these vicious criminals was the only reasonable alternative. However, harsher laws do not lower the crime rate, sending these children to prison does nothing to benefit society. It merely teaches youths to become better criminals and takes millions of dollars out of the taxpayers’ pockets. Juveniles should not be forced to face the harsh reality of adult criminal court and prison, but should be tried and sentenced as juveniles.…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This scenario has been played out in America’s courtrooms many times over the years. Every year in the United States, children as young as thirteen are sentenced to die in prison. It’s called life without parole (LWOP, JLWOP for juveniles). It is estimated that thousands of children have been sentenced to life without the possibility of parole for crimes committed at an age when they are not considered responsible enough to live away from their parents, drive, make decisions related to their education or medical treatment, vote, leave school or sign a contract. Children under the age eighteen cannot legally use alcohol, serve on juries or be drafted, because they are presumed not to have the capacity to handle adult responsibilities (Labelle, Phillips, Horton, 2006). These differences are recognized throughout the world, and incorporated into many international human rights documents.…

    • 3430 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of the most controversial issues in the rights of juveniles today is addressed in the question, Should the death penalty be applied to juveniles? For nearly a century the juvenile courts have existed to shield the majority of juvenile offenders from the full weight of criminal law and to protect their entitled special rights and immunities. In the case of kent vs. United states in 1996, Justice Fortas stated some of these special rights which include; Protection from publicity, confinement only to twenty-one years of age, no confinement with adults, and protection against the consequences of adult conviction such as the loss of civil rights, the use of adjudication against him in subsequent proceedings and disqualification of public employment (Kent vs. US 1966:1055). These special rights and immunities exist so that the justice courts can provide measures of guidance and rehabilitation for the child along with protection for society. However, there are some youths who are extremely dangerous and do not respond to attempts to reform themselves. The question is, should established mechanisms for transferring or waiving juvenile court jurisdiction in these exceptional cases take away these special rights and subject the youth to the full range of penalties for criminal behavior including, in some jurisdictions, execution (Thomson vs. State, 1986:784) ? Should These juveniles who perform the same malicious acts as some adult capital offenders be subject to the harshness of the criminal courts and the finality of the death penalty ? This paper will discuss a history of capital punishment for juveniles in the United States, methods of transferring juvenile cases to criminal courts, and also my position on the subject and justice of justice of juveniles and the death penalty. The constitutionality of the juvenile death penalty reached a settlement in 1988 in the case of Thompson v. Oklahoma when four Supreme Court Justices reached the conclusion that: persons under…

    • 2058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    He’s thirty-three years old, waking up on a cold, hard bed, eating “nutritious” food, scared of the other inmates, knowing his life will end in prison, all for a crime he committed when he was fourteen. He knows that he has a lot longer to serve as he was given a life sentence. This man described, who was once a child delinquent, is like many other children in America who faced the same fate. Since the very first court case of a child murderer, the debate of whether children should be tried as adults has been a raging discussion.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court stressed that “Capital punishment must be limited to those offenders who commit ‘a narrow category of the most serious crimes’ and whose extreme culpability makes them ‘the most deserving of execution.’” The Supreme also solidified its decision based on the principle that juveniles lack maturity and understanding of responsibility. Juveniles are prone to be influenced by their…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays