Preview

Arguments Against Judicial Activism

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
101 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Arguments Against Judicial Activism
Hi Prof. Ronan,
I do believe that judicial activism can be dangerous if the decision is made by a judge based on a belief that can be harmful to a group, such as being prejudice to a specific race, gender, or age, just to be spiteful. I would like to think that wouldn’t happen today and that we have learned from history not to repeat that kind of behavior, yet I still see it today. A good example is the fight for gay marriage and rights for equal treatment for transgenders.
Thank you for posting, have a good week ahead!
-Melissa
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against The 4th Amendment
    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Arguments Against The 4th Amendment

    An influential government philosopher John Locke once stated, “Government has no other end , but the preservation of property.” The 4th amendment has an important part of protecting essential values. 4th amendment allows people to be secured in persons, houses, ext.Unless an issued search warrant ,probable cause or reasonable suspicion. For instance a precedent is Katz v Ohio this shows that the government can go too far with their search and seizure procedure.Today there are many cases in which the government is not using a search warrant when they are searching someone. Another reason is the writs of assistance case which established that the government does not take into consideration the 4th amendment for years the colonies got their ships searched and they were ran over by the government until the 4th amendment became a bill of right. How they established this case is they searched a ship for smuggled goods. I think that this is too far because they shouldn't be able to…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    To what extent has the Roberts Court witnessed a revival of conservative activism
    • 968 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To what extent has the Roberts Court witnessed a revival of conservative activism

    Firstly, a major principal characteristic of the Roberts Court is over turning congressional and state legislation in order to achieve conservative goals. The Roberts court is finding laws unconstitutional and reversing precedent, two measures of activism. But the ideological direction of the court’s activism has undergone a marked change toward conservative results. The Roberts Court issued conservative decisions 58% of the time in its first 5 years throughout all cases. The Burger and Rehnquist courts issued conservative decisions 55% and the lowest from the Warren courts, which issued conservative decisions only 34% of the time. The incline in conservative decisions gives evidence that there is a growing number of people who favour this strict and traditional form of court rulings and decision making as opposed to Roberts immediate predecessors who display a more modern and loose approach to the US political system…

    • 968 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Judges In The Supreme Court
    • 239 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Pros And Cons Of Judges In The Supreme Court

    As we know in the Article III of the U.S constitution says that all judges in the Supreme Court and Inferior Courts can have their jobs for the rest of their life. The reasons that the judges can lose their job is by retirement or if they have been accused of any crime.…

    • 239 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mcdonalds Vs City Of Chicago Judicial Activism
    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mcdonalds Vs City Of Chicago Judicial Activism

    Judicial Activism is when the Supreme Court is willing to change the public policy that has been put into place. Judges who practice judicial activism are considered policy makers. Many of the laws that are passed often depend on what the society needs as a whole. As Pacelle stated in his book, “It is important to note that though many people equate judicial activism with…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Great Compromise: The Judicial Branch Of Government
    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Great Compromise: The Judicial Branch Of Government

    The judicial branch of government interprets laws and administers justice. The judicial branch of government was established by Article lll of the Constitution along with other Federal courts created by Congress. This branch came about when statesmen who met in Philadelphia were followers of Montesquieu's concept that powers in politics should be balanced. John Locke's writings supported and made this principle stronger, this led to the judgment that there needed to be three equal branches of government, the executive, legislative, and the judicial branch.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Difference Between Judicial Restraint Theory And Judicial Activism
    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Difference Between Judicial Restraint Theory And Judicial Activism

    The judicial restraint theory is based off the idea that judges should limit the exercise of their own power. For example, it would make judges think before shooting down laws, just because they can, with the exception being that they are unconstitutional. The opposite of judicial restraint is judicial activism. Judicial activism is when judges make rulings based on politics or personal beliefs rather than the law itself. The main difference between these two philosophies is judicial restraint is a bit more ethical then judicial activism. Both Clarence Thomas and Sonia Sotomayor are minorities to the Supreme Court. However, they both have very different viewpoints when it comes to how their race and background play a role in their rulings.…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Cases: The Modern Civil Rights Movement
    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Supreme Court Cases: The Modern Civil Rights Movement

    The modern civil rights movement has been affected by three very important Supreme Court cases. The first infamous case was the Dred Scott v. Sanford decision which dreadfully took away the rights of African Americans. Then the case of Plessy v. Ferguson was held in 1896 which had a major impact on the civil rights movement. This case decided that African Americans were “separate but equal”. Then finally the last infamous case was the Board v. the Board of Education which overruled the case of Plessy v. Ferguson. These cases made a huge dent on the civil rights movement and the equality laws we have instilled today.…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    United State Supreme Court Research Paper
    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    United State Supreme Court Research Paper

    The Federal Court System contains three levels of courts: first, U.S district courts and various courts of limited jurisdiction (trial courts of general jurisdiction). Second, U.S courts of appeals (intermediate courts of appeals). Finally, the highest level of the three level federal court system is the United State Supreme Court. Today, the United State Supreme Court is located in Washington D.C.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Term Limit In Supreme Court Justices
    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Term Limit In Supreme Court Justices

    One of the major jobs for the federal judges is to protect the United States from the “tyranny of the majority”. Furthermore, even if the majority rules, the minority still has rights. Many components of the Bill of Rights, which the judges are called to enforce, are designed to protect the rights of the unpopular minorities. Being a Supreme Court judge is a difficult job, and even with life tenure, they are not completely immune from political pressure. They remain members of society; therefore it is difficult to allow things to happen even if they know it is morally wrong, but constitutionally…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Judicial Branch Essay
    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Judicial Branch Essay

    The Current Power of the Branches of Our Federal Government An Opinion Brandon Parrish Fairmont State University…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros and Cons of Judicial Review
    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Pros and Cons of Judicial Review

    is one of the sole purposes of the Supreme Court of the United States. Many…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Judicial Activism In Canada
    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Judicial Activism In Canada

    Judicial activism believes that judges assume a role as independent policy makers on behalf of society that goes beyond their traditional role as interpreters of the Constitution and laws. Prior to the enactment of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms in 1982, the duty of Supreme Court justices was to interpret law, not took it upon themselves to make law. Nevertheless, the Supreme Court justices play a more predominant role in shaping government policy and legislation today than they did prior to 1982. Judicial activism in Canada has produced results that have been perceived as problematic by legislatures. The potential for the Supreme Court justices to interfere with the making of government’s judicial-policy has led to differing opinions…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Judicial Branch
    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Essay On Judicial Branch

    Hamilton argues in the federalist No. 78, which branches of government, specifically the judicial branch and how it’s the weakest branch of government. Hamilton believes that the Judicial branch only has the power to judge on laws, but does not alter the actual final decisions on what the laws people need to uphold. Hamilton recognizes that you need all three branches to make a successful government function and that the judicial branch is the least powerful of the three. The legislative branch makes the laws, executive branch enforces these laws and lastly the Judicial branch needs to understand the laws that are being put forth. Being the least dangerous branch of government it still has its checks and balances being able to hold one another to be accountable for each other, but also as a Judicial branch can keep the other branches in alignment.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Supreme Court Vs Indecisive Government
    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Supreme Court Vs Indecisive Government

    We as an American society, seem to have unique views on how our government takes action. Especially many have criticized actions that the supreme court has taken throughout history. Can we really say we have an indecisive Government? Looking back in history, we can recall how the Supreme Court acted differently than how they act today. I think the Supreme Court used to act based on the context of history in past court cases. However, today I believe the Court seems to act on behalf of the well connected and powerful people. We as a society often proclaimed, that our government only “works” for the rich in some cases that's true. Yet in others the Supreme acts in favor of the people defending the purpose of the constitution, which is liberty and justice.…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Arguments Against The Fourth Amendment
    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Arguments Against The Fourth Amendment

    Is it acceptable for the government to search if it has no reason to suspect a person has done something wrong? Today’s application of the Fourth Amendment would surprise those who drafted it and not just because they could not imagine technologies like the Internet and drones. In the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, policing consisted of citizen patrols or a loose collection of sheriffs and constables, who lacked the tools to maintain order as the police do today. That said, to determine if the right to privacy is a threat to our national security, I reviewed the Fourth Amendment, the government’s use of surveillance, and arguments for as well as against its use.…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics