Preview

Arguments Against Genome Editing

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1017 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Arguments Against Genome Editing
From a moral, social, and economic standpoint, I feel that Genome Editing wouldn’t be beneficial for future generations. I believe that we as a society should not utilize genome editing because it defeats the idea that everyone is unique and that by deleting certain genomes, it may result in them losing certain characteristics. We realize that certain disabilities may everyone different and may not have them struggling with something they love or that they wish that they didn’t have their disability. Their disability in a way, makes them who they are and they wouldn’t want to change that. However, we also have to take in account of how expensive this procedure is and how not a lot of people may be able to afford this. Hence, I believe that …show more content…
I feel that genome editing takes away the mystery of life and how everyone is unique because of their genomes and how they were naturally born. Many people believe that disabilities hinder that person’s life and that they are never happy with their life as a result of their disability. However, “[o]ne study3 found that half of people with serious disabilities ranked their quality of life as ‘good’ or ‘excellent’. ”(Hayden 4). This shows how they are happy with their lifestyles and that they wouldn’t want to change a single thing. Also, when mothers are pregnant, they are able to see if their child has a disability or any type of disease. However, some people decide not to know if their child has a disability or not because they don’t care about that and will love their child no matter what. For example, “Ethan Weiss doesn’t see a child with a disability. He sees his daughter making the most of her life, given all her strengths and challenges. And he knows that wouldn’t change a thing.” (Hayden 4). It shows how some people don’t care if anyone has disabilities and that everyone is special in their own way. Thus, from a social viewpoint, genome editing may not be the best option for the future generation, but it may help cure diseases that harm people’s

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Genetic coding plays a big role in life expectancy. There is still a lot of research to be done and test to be performed, thus making genetic coding unsafe for the time being. Until further research is performed, we do not know the life expectancy of someone who has been fully genetically modified, nor do we know about any health problems related to genetic coding. As genetic coding is researched and tested more, maybe one day it will be safe and legal to…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dna Dbq Analysis

    • 229 Words
    • 1 Page

    I do not think we should change human DNA and genes to make “better” people. God created people the way they were for a reason. We don’t need to try to control people’s characteristics. I don’t think people or governments should get to decide if they are going to genetically modify their kids. Genes are a set of instructions that determine an organism’s appearance (OI). They are found on chromosomes (OI). Humans have 23 pairs of chromosomes (OI). Scientists have been able to find a gene that makes people not feel any pain (Doc. 2). People are thinking about altering genes to make babies smarter (Doc. 4). There is also the possibility of altering genes to prevent illnesses (Doc. 3). Some genetically modified kids could have aggression…

    • 229 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is amazing to think that we can choose how our kids will be. Do we want to raise generations of fools or generations of intellects and scholars? Of course we want the latter. We do not want our futures in the hands of incompetent beings, which is why genetic engineering is such a plausible solution. Right now, genetic engineering control is in the hands of government which is where it needs to stay. The ability alter the chemical make-up of a population or food is too much power and responsibility for one person to hand, which is why it needs to be in the watchful eye of our government superiors. We have trusted our government to directly deal with issues we as Americans would rather ignore like war and discrepancies regarding the value of money over the past; consequently, this emphasizes my main idea, which is that genetic engineering should be monitored and overseen by our…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the begging people will be against it, over the years people will turn over to the change but is that a good thing? If modifying a baby has its good side then it should also have it bad sides. Right now on earth we have over 7 billion people and if everybody besided to start having Designer Babies there will be no individuals why?.. Because everyone will be this extremely intelligent, mega strong non-aging human being. We are not all meant to be the same. If you have a bad gene wear your bad gene. The fact that people can make newborns in to technically robots, is something to think about. Having a Designer Baby means you can choose what your baby looks like,acts like,if they have any allergies if they look more like mom or dad if even if they look them at all. But what would that mean for our future? If all kids become Genetically Modified no one would be different we would all be the same wouldn’t it, because if we all become the ultimate human with zero flaw, there would be individuality. Im talking about shape,strength, intelligents those are all different levels in every human being on earth, if you go in and make everyone's levels has high as they can be, we would be no different than robots. “It is true that Genetic Engineering can cure many diseases but it can lead to new ones as well. How do we know for sure that mixing DNA to…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Modifying genes could be a way of preventing unwanted traits or enhance characteristics (Against Designer Babies, Sheldon Krimsky). Unfortunately, CRISPR is a first generation tool, so there is no possibility no damage will be done to the baby. As well as no security, the baby will not have any life-threatening defects, as it is known that “curing” one disease causes another. In fact, this will create a bad relationship between parents and children (The Ethnic of ‘Designer Babies’, Tia Ghose), since the children have no choice in being modified. Using babies to alter their characteristics is using them as science experiments since there are over one hundred genes that account for each trait and fifty genes account for three percent of one gene (Against Designer Babies, Sheldon Krimsky). With many parents willing to allow these experimentations to occur on their baby, it will come at a huge…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The key argument in favor of the human genome project is based on its potential for treating individuals severely affected by their condition. Genetic bases for many diseases have been proven,which makes the human genome project very important for understanding how to treat, and even cure some of these diseases (Friedman & Schustack, 2005) A ideal example is Lesch-Nyhan disease, which is distinguished communication deficits and involuntary self-injurious behavior. Males who have this disorder have to be restrained frequently to prevent them from inflicting serious damage on themselves. Most of these individuals have their have teeth removed to keep from biting their lips off. If we have a new medical genetic technology that will cure this…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How would you feel if I told you that the food you're eating was made in a science lab? Genetically modified organisms, or GMOs, are the outcome of a laboratory process where genes from the DNA of one species are extracted and artificially manipulated into the genes of an uncorrelated plant or animal. Crops are often genetically modified to be resistant to pesticides so farmers would be able to spray them without harming the crop itself. However, there are many consequences regarding consumers’ health and environmental problems. Many people question the safety of consuming genetically modified organisms. Companies should acknowledge that their product is genetically modified by placing a label on the product because customers have a right to know. Furthermore, there are several serious health complications that may rise to the consumer. And finally, genetically modifying organisms should be limited by being placed in a controlled environment to prevent contamination with other species because it can be harmful to the environment in several ways.…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    CBS News airs a lot of news, like new findings in science and technology, entertainment, health, sports, and crime. The guest speaker was Eric Schadt who is the director of the Icahn Institute for Genomics and Multiscale Biology at Mount Sinai Hospital in New York. I will be using this source to explain my counter argument on how Gene Editing can be a good thing. Gene editing has evolved into switching out one mutated gene for a healthier gene, instead of how they used to just discard of an embryo altogether. This is revolutionary because we can cure the embryo before it is born of a laundry list of different diseases, with the only catch being that they need to be a single gene. If it is not a single gene it makes it much more difficult because scientists would need to change an entire genome, this is not yet possible for science. The diseases that could be cured include Huntington's Disease, Cystic Fibrosis, Tay-Sachs disease, as well breast cancer. Not to mention that there is a hope that scientists will be able to help people live longer. This was an interview on CBS News which leads me to believe that this is a primary…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This quote from Nikola pretty much stated that Eugenics is already present in his day and age and by 2100 it will be something common and done on a regular basis. Furthermore as our development in the medical field advances the process of genomic alteration will be less expensive, safer and more efficient. My position on this topic is more in the middle as I will only be behind it as long as the practices are ethical and the patient is in consent of the operation.…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While there are amazing advances in genetic engineering, opponents of gene editing cast a grim light on new technologies that put the human race further to the ability to change the genetic makeup of the human genome. When the ability to edit the human genome became realized, skeptics immediately voiced their opinions on how outrageous the thought of manipulating the human genome was. To manipulate the human genome was to change the past and hinder natural selection, the cornerstone of evolution. Opponents of gene editing like Josephine Quintavalle stated, “The commodification of children in reproductive technology is turning parenthood into an unhealthy model of self-gratification rather than a relationship where unequivocal acceptance and love of the offspring, an ideal of…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against Eugenics

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Even though eugenics can improve someone’s life, the government should not be allowed to decide if future children have good or bad genes because we are not completely sure what is necessary and what is not and you are altering something that was naturally…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I think that there is a pretty mixed batch for support and opposition for the Human Genome Project. The HGP is a complex project that has ethical, medical, and legal ramifications. From a scientific point of view, the benefits of HGP are enormous. Arguments for HGP could include; expanding our knowledge of gene expression, discovering means of diagnosis and treatments for untreatable genetic diseases, discoveries in the development of drug resistant bacteria, increasing the productivity of livestock, allowing for the development of new crops, and improving the quality of our environment. For example; knowledge about the effects of DNA variations among people could lead to new ways to diagnose, treat, and perhaps someday prevent many of…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hereditarily screening our posterity to improve individuals is simply dependable child rearing and an ethical commitment. As guardians we need our children to experience their fullest capacities. Genetically altering babies could be viewed as an "ethical commitment" as it makes them grow up into "morally better kids", this in light of a couple of hereditary connections to 'identity issue. Genetically modifying individuals can help improve the quality of life and overall make up the society by allowing parents to choose the DNA makeup of their offspring.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Crispr

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Unlike religion, children can not simply change their genetics when they come of age. Modifying human embryos determines the physical, and arguably mental, characteristics of the unborn children. By deciding to use CRISPR on a human embryo, a child must accept the predetermined choice made by another human. This process will determine what the child will look, act, and think for the rest of his life. Without an doubt, using CRISPR to modify human genes goes against all the civil liberties that America believes in.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Imagine a world where autism and downs syndrome are a thing of the past, and where there is no shortage on food for anybody. Over the years mankind has developed and improved technology to save more and more lives through the manipulation of the DNA that makes up all living organisms. However, there are those who oppose this approach. Despite the risks and ethical concerns, genetic engineering holds the potential to benefit humanity through both direct and indirect means.…

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays