From a Christian standpoint, God made everyone and each and every person is unique in their own way. Also, in the pledge of allegiance it says that we are ‘one nation under God’, so would that mean the government would be going against our ancestors Christian morals? This country was based on Christian morals, so what would our ancestors think of this? I will admit, it would be nice if we lived in a world where no one had no cancer or disease, but it is morally wrong. I was raised in a household where we believe in Christianity and I was taught that no one could judge you except God. Therefore, from a Christian standpoint, having the government decide whether children in the future has good or bad genes goes against my …show more content…
My opponent would argue against me with many different points. They would ask why we should have to deal with humans who will never be able to take care of themselves? Why should we have to pay taxes to take care of these people when we can prevent them from being here in the first place? They might also say that we can better the human race worldwide by doing this and we can create a world where no one has to go through emotional and physical suffering. They would also say that we do this with things such as dogs and plants, so why are we not allow our species to become stronger and better as well? Well, I would tell my opponent many things, but first off I would tell them that eugenics is unethical. I would argue and say that we were created naturally, so we should be able to develop naturally as well, opposed to having our genetics being changed. I would ask my opponent if they know how dangerous these procedures are? How do they know that eugenics will affect our population in a positive way? Eugenics could actually end up being bad for the human race because we could possibly be removing genes that help us, and we don’t even know