Argumentative Essay: Women's Views On Equality
believe Equality 7-2521 is correct in morally denouncing the leaders of the city.
The leaders of the city and the world have taken away the natural rights of mankind. “Dare not choose in your minds the work you would like to do when you leave the Home of the students.” (page 4 paragraph 7) This is a statement made by one of the teachers to the classes in the Home of the Students. This means that you are not allowed to have preference, favoritism, or any other sort of desire for what you’ll do with your life. The thought of it, alone, is enough to get you in trouble. Preference, especially in your future, is a natural feeling of Human beings. It is not something that should be taken away from men because it is healthy.
The world leaders, scholars, and teachers have all also held back on the succession of technology. “The Council of Scholars has said that we all …show more content…
They go as far as making it a sin to even think of women. “For men are forbidden to take notice of women, and women are forbidden to take notice of men.” (page 11 paragraph 4) If men are not allowed to love one another then what is the purpose of life? Love is arguably one of the most important thing in this world and without it life can seem meaningless. The fact that the leaders do not allow for any such thing to come close to happening just goes to show how immoral these leaders are.
After reviewing and dissecting each of these immoralities of the leaders you can see how Equality 7-2521 was correct in morally denouncing the leaders. Taking away the simple yet vital part of living a happy life and making having preferences. Keeping technology from progressing, and making the lives of men and woman severely difficult. Stopping men from the experiencing the most important and possibly best thing they could ever go endure, love itself, is extremely inhumane. The leaders have never been, and never will be right to do what they do at
The leaders of the city and the world have taken away the natural rights of mankind. “Dare not choose in your minds the work you would like to do when you leave the Home of the students.” (page 4 paragraph 7) This is a statement made by one of the teachers to the classes in the Home of the Students. This means that you are not allowed to have preference, favoritism, or any other sort of desire for what you’ll do with your life. The thought of it, alone, is enough to get you in trouble. Preference, especially in your future, is a natural feeling of Human beings. It is not something that should be taken away from men because it is healthy.
The world leaders, scholars, and teachers have all also held back on the succession of technology. “The Council of Scholars has said that we all …show more content…
They go as far as making it a sin to even think of women. “For men are forbidden to take notice of women, and women are forbidden to take notice of men.” (page 11 paragraph 4) If men are not allowed to love one another then what is the purpose of life? Love is arguably one of the most important thing in this world and without it life can seem meaningless. The fact that the leaders do not allow for any such thing to come close to happening just goes to show how immoral these leaders are.
After reviewing and dissecting each of these immoralities of the leaders you can see how Equality 7-2521 was correct in morally denouncing the leaders. Taking away the simple yet vital part of living a happy life and making having preferences. Keeping technology from progressing, and making the lives of men and woman severely difficult. Stopping men from the experiencing the most important and possibly best thing they could ever go endure, love itself, is extremely inhumane. The leaders have never been, and never will be right to do what they do at