Preview

Argumentative Essay: The US Patriot Act

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
788 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Argumentative Essay: The US Patriot Act
On September 11th, 2001, tragedy struck America. A terrorist attack was carried out resulting in 2,753 Americans killed. America became locked in a war, and it needed more security on its own soil. So, congress passed a law known as the U.S.A Patriot Act. U.S A Patriot is a 10 letter acronym for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism. This allowed the N.S.A (national security agency) to gain information of individual citizens or groups of individuals by using library records, phone calls and other surveillance. Recently, on January 1st of 2015 the Patriot Act has expired. Many members of government are stuck in a debate if it should be renewed or not. It should be reauthorized …show more content…
Before federal agents take surveillance and seize phone calls or records from a person they must first have a good reason or evidence to do so. This follows the idea of probable cause listed above. Next, before agents can seize anything they must issue a warrant and have it approved. This way they can’t just see anybody’s information that they want to. Here is a quote from a heritage.org writer on the Patriot Act’s constitutionality. “ No single provision of the Patriot Act has ever been found unconstitutional. This is a testament to the act’s limited applicability, procedural safeguards, and extensive oversight

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    America's Privacy

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, a U.S. law called the Patriot Act was passed under the Bush administration. The goal of passing this law was to strengthen domestic security and broaden the powers of law-enforcement agencies with regards to identifying and stopping terrorists (Grabianowski). The privacy of the American public was first questioned in 2006 when USA Today reported that the NSA had “been secretly collecting the phone call records of tens of millions of Americans, using data provided by AT&T, Verizon and BellSouth” and was “using the data to analyze calling patterns in an effort to detect terrorist activity” (Greenwald). This article referred to a secret…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Argument Against NSA

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In 2005, government contractor, Edward J. Snowden, leaked classified documents to the public, revealing a classified government surveillance program headed by our own National Security Agency. This leakage confirmed that the NSA has stolen trillions of U.S. citizens’ emails, phone calls, and other information from both the Internet and our phones. It is understood that the collection and analysis of all information is part of the NSA’s mission to keep the United States safe, however, it’s troubling that our own government has to sneak around us. Regardless of whether or not U.S. citizens’ are committing illegal crimes, we should be concerned that the government and NSA steal our private information without our consent. As the government…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Electronic Surveillance

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2105). Looking at both of the pre-laws and the present Patriot Act, I find that the main difference is the Patriot Act gutted the protections that was given to the American people, which was used to keep the government from abusing its authority. Therefore, the Patriot Act reduced the standard required by law enforcement when it came to obtaining information, obtaining a warrant for example, and now it only requires it to be relevant to someone with possible ties to terrorism or foreign intelligence ("Congress Seeks To Expand Warrantless Surveillance Under The Patriot Act |…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Security vs. Liberty

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the wake of September 11th, the country was in turmoil. Fear and confusion were rampant; direction was required. President George Bush, in a famous address, acknowledged the severity of the attacks, and called for a newly invigorated sense of nationalism. His plan for preventing future attacks called for the creation of the Department of Homeland Security, and expanded powers to intelligence agencies (Bush). During this time, one of the most provocative bills was allowed to pass, under the guise of a terrorist seeking bill. The Patriot Act was indeed effective in increasing the power allotted to surveillance agencies, but many feel at too high of a cost. Many have asked the question… "is the cure worse than the disease?" In order to appropriately analyze the Patriot Act, it is important to look at its exact stipulations, and how it has been used (misused) at the time of its passage and now.…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Following the events of September 11th, Congress passed the ‘Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001’, abbreviated as the ‘USA PATRIOT Act’ and known simply as the ‘Patriot Act.’…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cell Phone Impact

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages

    On May 26, 2011, President Barack Obama signed the PATRIOT Sunsets Extension Act of 2011 witch allowed an extension of the patriot act that include roving wiretaps, searches of business records, and conducting surveillance of individuals suspected of terrorist-related activities. Because of a lack of Congressional approval, parts of the Patriot Act expired on June 1, 2015. But With the passing of the USA Freedom Act on June 2, 2015 the expired parts were renewed until 2019. However, it was amended to keep the National Security Agency from continuing its mass phone data collection program. The subject of security vs privacy is a heavily debated subject of citizens and government officials.…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pleading the Second Amendment to back up your gun rights is actually not a completely valid argument. Some people believe the Second Amendment not only allows them to own guns, but that the government cannot restrain those rights. This thought process on our rights in untrue not only in this circumstance but in all of our rights. The government can restrict our rights, and they do. The fact is, there are already limits on firearms by the government. For example: people cannot own machine guns, hand grenades, or shoulder-launched missiles and children, mentally ill, and felons cannot own any type of gun. The Supreme Court has refused to inspect the laws that bound the right to carry firearms and specific types…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Developed “to deter and punish terrorist acts in the United States and around the world, to enhance law enforcement investigatory tools, and for other purposes” the USA Patriot Act, bears the formal name ‘‘Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA Patriot Act, 2001, p. 1). Heretofore referred to as the “Patriot Act” the USA Patriot Act was signed into law within 6 weeks from initial draft to final approval supporting the enforcement of laws for the ultimate protection of the United States and her citizens by granting access to persons and information with liberal criminal and civil procedure exceptions. The Patriot Act immediately granted broad-based interrogation, surveillance and isolation abilities to law enforcement when investigating “crimes against terror” (US Government, 2011)…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Liberty and security are like twin brothers. Whenever people talk about one, they have to mention the other one also. However, these twin brothers do not seem to get along with each other very well. Issue between liberty and security has caught public attentions since the September 11 terrorist attack. Some people argue that security is way more important than liberty and that they are willing to give up some liberty for security even it is temporary, while others stand on a very different ground; they hold an opinion that it is not worth trading liberty for security, under any circumstances. In my point of view, temporary security is not worth the price of losing liberty for.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Reflective Essay

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 2001 Congress passes the Patriot Act, this act is to improve the government's ability to stop future terrorist attacks, since 9/11 happened.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States was attacked in an unforgettable brutally violent way. Many Americans lost their lives in a couple of hours. In the wake of the terrorist attacks, Congress passed a law called Patriot Act. The purpose of the Patriot Act is to deter and punish terrorist acts in the United States and around the world. The Patriot Act enhance law enforcement investigatory tools, and some of which to strengthen U.S. military defense in measures to prevent another attack from the terrorist. The Act allows federal officials to have a greater authority in tracking and intercepting communications, both for purposes of law enforcement and foreign gathering information to require all appropriate communication to stop…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    9 11

    • 1360 Words
    • 4 Pages

    One of the major changes that were caused by the attack of 9/11 was the introduction to the Patriot Act. “The USA PATRIOT Act is an Act of Congress that was signed into law by President George W. Bush on October 26, 2001. The title of the act is a ten-letter acronym (USA PATRIOT) that stands for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001The Patriot Act gives the U.S. power to deter and punish terrorist acts in the U.S. and around the world.”2 This law was passed just forty-six days after the attacks on the twin towers and the pentagon occurred. The patriot act dramatically reduced restrictions on law enforcement agencies' ability to search telephone, e-mails, medical, financial, and other records; eased restrictions on foreign intelligence gathering within the United States. Basically there was nothing off limits to government agencies such as the F.B.I., they were able to obtain any documents they felt necessary to fight terrorism. “It also expanded the Secretary of the…

    • 1360 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This Act may be cited as the "Uniting and Strengthening America Act" by providing appropriate tools required to intercept and obstruct terrorism. President Bush signed the Patriot Act on October 29, 2001. It passed and with no debate voted on; many members of congress did not fully read the act. Due to the anthrax scare many Congressman did not have access to their offices. Attorney General John Ashcroft silenced any debate by warning that anyone who contested the Act would be "akin to a traitor abetting the terrorist."(Podesta, 2001) Congress had rejected many of the provisions previously debated. It was a recycled compilation of many extreme "wish lists." In the post 9/11 wake of fear, it became a reality.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    uddenly with all the new technology and the government invading our privacy, we have to watch what is said or done on any technological devices. Nowadays the use of Internet and devices are becoming an issue because citizens are becoming concerned that their most private details are being monitored. Innocent people are bothered by the fact that the government can see their personal information. Even though the government says that they want to help and be able to protect people and stop criminals from committing crimes before they are done, they are just making people fell concerned about their personal privacy and well being. The United States Government and the NSA have been violating citizens personal rights for a while now, they say that…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The USA PATRIOT Act was passed by Congress as a response to the terrorist attack of September 11. On October 26, 2001 The USA PATRIOT Act (Public Law No. 107-56) was signed into law by President George W. Bush. The USA PATRIOT Act "Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism” this law enabled law enforcement personnel new abilities to search, seize, detain, or eavesdrop in their pursuit of possible terrorists as it states in our text. For the most part public response for The Patriot Act has been very close to even a Feb 2011 survey from the Pew Research center states “42% say the Patriot Act is a necessary tool that helps the government find terrorists, while somewhat fewer (34%) say the Patriot Act goes too far and poses a threat to civil liberties.” As compared to their Jan 2006 survey that said, “The public divided evenly over the Patriot Act, with 39% saying it is a necessary tool and 38% saying it goes too far.” When one thinks of the Pros of the Patriot Act he has to include the use of surveillance.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays