Preview

Argumentative Essay: The Dred Scott Case Of 1856

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
186 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Argumentative Essay: The Dred Scott Case Of 1856
The Dred Scott case of 1856 was a debate on whether a slave of African American decent had any legal power to sue for their freedom and be granted the rights, privileges, and immunities granted to all United States citizens. Dred Scott argued that he should be entitled to liberty and the benefits that come with being a United States citizen because he had lived in the Free State of Illinois for some time and spent time in the northern part of the Louisiana purchase which was also a free territory. Scott ended up suing, and after many appeals in the lower circuit courts, his case was ultimately taken to the supreme court since no state had the jurisdiction to ban slavery. The state of Missouri cannot act on its own to enact citizenship and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dred Scott v. Sanford came to trial in 1854. Let it be known that Dred Scott was the only case that reached the Supreme Court brought on by a slave against his master (Vandervelde 5). Scott presented the courts with the same arguments and three main questions were brought before the court: 1) As a black man, was Scott a citizen with a right to sue in federal courts? 2) Had prolonged residence (two years in each place) in a free state and territory made Scott free? 3) Was Fort Snelling actually free territory (McPherson)? The central issue had been how residence on free soil affected the legal status of a slave (Garraty 91). Sanford sought to have the Missouri decision upheld mainly on the basis of two arguments. First, they maintained that…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the case of Dred Scott, he told the court that Sanford and himself were citizens of two different states. However, the court makes it quite clear that Dred Scott is not a citizen of Missouri; and because he is not a citizen he does not have the right to sue in a federal court. Throughout the case the court gives several reasons why Dred Scott is not considered a citizen of Missouri. They use excerpts from the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence to prove that because Dred Scott is of the African race he can never become a citizen, free or not. After the court officially decided that Dred Scott is not a citizen and does not have the right to sue; because of this, the court does not have the jurisdiction to make a decision on…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Some consider Dred Scott not a citizen. The question has also been raised about the constitutionality of the Missouri Compromise and whether it not infringes on an individual’s right to protect property which is written in the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution. What is considered a man or “men” in the Declaration of Independence is questioned and some justices ask if African Americans or those with slave roots are in the category of this people and if the equality guaranteed by the Declaration of Independence and the Natural and Common Laws granted by the Constitution is applicable to African American men . The consistent racist rulings by the states courts and eventually the federal court have led to the escalation of the Dred Scott case to the Supreme…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    On March 6, 1857, Justice Taney stated that Dred Scott had no right to bring a law suit in Federal Court, because the Constitution only afforded that right to U.S. citizens. Since Scott was a slave, he was not a citizen. He went…

    • 213 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It started when the court decided that all blacks could never become citizens of the United States. The people in the case was Dred Scott a slave who lived in Illinois and the free territory of Wisconsin before moving to Missouri the slave state…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dred Scott was a African American slave born in Virginia in the year 1800. In the 1830s Scott and Harriet Robinson lived in Fort Snelling in the 1830s working as free people as slavery was outlawed in the area. He lived there with an army surgeon named Emerson and was paid an independent salary. When Emerson was reassigned to the south they Scotts moved to fort Jesup in Louisiana. But soon returned to Fort snelling. In 1846 the Scotts decided to sue for their freedom because they were denied the optioned to buy it by Emerson's widow. In 1853 they filed in federal court. After Dred was freed in St. Louis circuit court in 1857, the supreme court made a decision based on the Dred Scott case stating that African Americans were not citizens and…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On the dusk of March 4, 1974, an African American by the name of James Bain is convicted of raping a nine-year-old boy at a baseball field in Lake Wales, Florida. The victim reported that the offender was 17 or 18 years old and had bushy sideburns. After police revealed photographs of six potential suspects, only two of them had sideburns. On the grounds that James Bain has side burns, he was interrogated around midnight the next day. Upon interrogation, Bain declared that he was watching television on the night of the attack. Even with an alibi backed by his sister, the police still arrested him. On the day of the trail, the FBI presented the victim's underwear that contained the rapist’s semen. Although they had the semen of the rapist, DNA…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Dred Scott Supreme Court decision is an embarrassment in American history. Before the the case was brought to the court Dred Scott,an enslaved African American, tried to buy his freedom for $300 but the offer was declined. He finally went to the court to see if his freedom could be granted through the legal system. However he lost on a technicality because he could not provide sufficient proof that he was owned by Emerson’s widow. In 1850 there was a retrial in the Missouri supreme court, which granted them freedom. However two years later the Supreme court stepped in and reversed that ruling. He finally appealed to the United States Supreme Court, which ruled that because he was black he was not a citizen, in effect he restricted, or…

    • 168 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1857, Dred Scott lost his case proving that he should be free because he had been held as a slave while living in a free state. The Court ruled that his petition couldn’t be seen because he did not own property. But it went further, to state that even though he had been taken by his 'owner' into a free state, he was still a slave because slaves were to be considered property of their owners. This decision furthered the cause of abolitionists as they increased their efforts to fight against slavery.…

    • 537 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hello there, I’m Dred Scott. an African American slave.! I’m tired of it… But no need to be sad, I have a Great story to tell you!…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the night of February 28, 2012 Trayvon Martin was walking through a neighborhood from a convenience store. He was carrying an Arizona tea and a pack of skittles. This neighborhood had been having someone invading their homes. George Zimmerman saw him walking and called the police. They told him not to follow the suspicious person and officers were on their way. He didn’t listen and got out of his car. Him and Martin got into an argument. During the argument, Trayvon was fatally shot by Zimmerman.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Slavery was at the root of the case of Dred Scott v. Sandford. Dred Scott sued his master to obtain freedom for himself and his family. His argument was that he had lived in a territory where slavery was illegal; therefore he should be considered a free man. Dred Scott was born a slave in Virginia around 1800. Scott and his family were slaves owned by Peter Blow and his family. He moved to St. Louis with them in 1830 and was sold to John Emerson, a military doctor. They went to Illinois and the Wisconsin territory where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Dred Scott married and had two daughters. John Emerson married Irene Sanford. In 1842, they all returned to St. Louis, Missouri. John Emerson died the next year. In 1846, Scotts sued Irene Emerson for their freedom. The Scott’s stay in free territories gave them the ability to sue for their freedom. However, they did not do this while they were living there (Dred Scott’s Fight).…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A male prisoner contends that California's refusal to allow male inmates to apply to the ACP violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. William Sassman is a male prisoner in the California Department of Corrections (CDCR). He applies for the Alternative Custody Program (ACP), which allows low-level offenders to reunite with their families early. Sassman, a father of two and a mother dying of colon cancer applies for ACP. He is denied by the CDCR solely on the fact that he is male. Jerry Brown writes this discrimination into law. Sassman files a lawsuit. Sassman v. Brown, 73 F. Supp. 3d 1241 (2015). Gay Grunfeld of Rosen Bien Galvan & Grunfeld LLP, lead counsel for the plaintiff states that, “Denying men the opportunity to reunite with their families entrenches harmful gender stereotypes suggesting that only women can be caregivers, and harms children by preventing them from re-establishing and furthering their relationships with their fathers.…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “It was down in Mississippi no so long ago, when a young boy from Chicago town stepped through a Southern door. This boy 's dreadful tragedy I can still remember well,…

    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Dred-Scott was a controversial case that made its way to the Supreme Court. The decision of the Supreme Court was that Dred-Scott was not a free person, after having lived and married in two Free states of Illinois and Minnesota. Delivering a blow to Wilmot Proviso and popular sovereignty as well as scrubbing the Missouri Compromise (Norton, 2015). This decision appeared to have slammed any hopes on justice for blacks which provoked rage and despair. Slavery had become the Law of the Land and the future of Blacks in America seemed dismal at bet causing social unrest and skepticism from northern voters seeing that the majority of Justices were Southerners (Norton…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays