Preview

Argumentative Essay: The Abuse Of Government Assistance

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
614 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Argumentative Essay: The Abuse Of Government Assistance
With the past leniency on government assistance, lack of control on benefits, abuse from recipients and waste of tax payer’s dollars’ people should be required to pass a drug test for prolonged benefits from the government. Government assistant is an amazing thing our country offers, but with the current fraud that these programs are experiencing the ropes should be tightened up. Benefits should be looked at as a stepping stone and not the means of living for years to come.
Government assistance was initially created during the great depression of the 1930s, the devastation on families during that time was life threatening. With the men out of work families needed help, with food, clothing, shelter, “these we desperate times.” The federal government stepped in to help these people, mostly women, children, and the elderly. Before this time Americans prided themselves on work ethic, self-reliance, and hard work to support their own families, many felt embarrassed to accept or ask for help to support their families. But,
…show more content…
Many high paying and even entry level jobs require drug testing, the same should apply for Government assistance including Medi-cal, WIC, Social Security, welfare and all other forms of free assistance. Working Americans pay for all of these and it shouldn’t be misused like it has been for so long. Looking at the statistics from 2009 to 2011 welfare is on the rise. The cost of drug testing is about a hundred and fifteen dollars individual testing, with 9% failing the testing in Oklahoma alone the cost of testing is almost irrelevant since it would be saving taxpayers money for that individual and receiving benefits. We should then offer counseling, drug rehabilitation, and a trade school to these persons to get back on the right

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The federal government administered the food stamp program in an attempt to aid those with little to no income in acquiring food. The object of food stamps is to put food on the table for many families who don’t have the money to do it on their own by giving them monthly benefits. The use of food stamps is rapidly growing due to the growth rate of recipients in the program. Because of this growth, there is a visible spike in the funding for food stamps. This unnecessary funding for food stamps has increased the government spending to an all-time high. The assistance gained from food stamps is detrimental to our society.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ok, let's all look at this as realistically as we can; if just 1 person failed a drug test for the welfare, that's a whole extra few hundred dollars per month that our government can save, and that's only for 1 person! A typical drug test cost around $10 for the cheaper ones. That's store price too, that's not considering what government contracter bulk…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Florida Governor Rick Scott made plans to test all welfare recipients to see if they are using drugs before they can receive payments is hardly saving the state any money, according to recent reports. At $30 per test, the state paid $28,800 in drug test reimbursements (960 reimbursements at $30 each, since about 2 percent also didn’t finish the application process) for those who did pass, while saving themselves about $66,000 in payments that did not have to be made for the year to those applicants that didn’t make it through for one reason or another (applicants receive $138 a month, or $1,656 per year).…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    By the end of World War I, The American society had become primarily urban and industrialized. A large portion of the American people was dependent on cash wages for their support than ever before. By the mid 1930’s, the lifetime savings of millions of people had been whipped out. By 1932, unemployment had reached thirty-four percent of the nonagricultural work forces and national income was dropped forty-three percent. The vast numbers of people and people nearing old age, the loss of their savings brought with it the prospect of living their remaining years in destitution. At the height of the depression, many people were flat out broke. The poor houses and other relief agencies that existed at the time to assist people who had fallen on hard times were financed mainly from charity and local…

    • 4220 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Historical Funding

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Great Depression caused great economic stressors for many families in the United States. In an effort to help with the costs of medical care, states were allowed to provide additional funds for the cost of medical care for families receiving welfare. According to Mann, Rowland, and Garfield (2003), “Title V of the Social Security Act of 1935 also established “Grants to States for Maternal and Child Welfare (Mann, Rowland and Garfield, 2003, pg 32). The grants would provide the states with funds for the medical care for children.…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order meet eligibility requirements, potential employees must submit to the testing and declare that they will maintain a drug free status by joining the random pool that can be tested at any time during employment. Since this is becoming the norm when seeking employment, should those individuals who have not found employment but seek government assistance be subject to the same types of drug testing?…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One year after the release of The End of Poverty, New York University economist William Easterly released a book entitled White Man's Burden which criticized Jeffrey Sachs' promotion of more aid to Africa. Easterly contended that "Sachs' anti-poverty prescriptions rest heavily on the kindness of some pretty dysfunctional regimes", arguing that large amounts of international aid are generally wasted or embezzled by corrupt governments. For example, he points to "studies in Guinea, Cameroon, Uganda and Tanzania, which estimated that 30 to 70 percent of government drugs disappeared into the black market rather than reaching the patients". Further, he also cited studies which contend that aid tends to have little effect on promoting economic growth even in countries with good governance.…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There is much debate regarding this issue. Supporters of requiring drug tests for welfare applicants believe that there will be many people deterred from applying due to knowing they will not pass. They also believe that some will fail the drug tests. These supporters believe this number of people will be so large that there will be a significant decrease in welfare spending. Other supporters have said “substance abuse is a prominent barrier preventing people from making the necessary transition from governmental dependence to self-reliance.”(Targeted News Service) Opponents have said this is a direct violation of our constitutional rights as American citizens. Some have even said it is not right to assume that just because people are poor, they drug users. Other opposers of welfare drug testing have argued that it will not save money at…

    • 1822 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Drug testing has its pros and cons. One pro is that it would immediately take off any drug users who could use the money for drugs or other illegal substances; adding to that, it would give people the motivation to stay off drugs for themselves and their families if they want to still receive government benefits. Some people look at it like, if people are getting jobs have to get drug tested, why don’t the people receiving welfare have to?”(HRF, 2014). One of the cons for drug testing is that people feel like it is discrimination against the poor. The poor believe that higher up people who are considered rich aren’t required to take a drug test (HRF,…

    • 1965 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    We live in an age of laziness, and by that I mean people take the easy way out more often than they should. Now that being said, finding the easy way to do something is not always a bad thing. The case of Americans fraudulently receiving welfare checks is an example of the laziness I am discussing. As a society, we need to make this accepted practice an unaccepted practice. We need to stand up and make the process of applying and receiving these benefits more stringent than they currently are. I believe through use of mandatory random drug testing, progress monitoring, on- going physical and mental examinations, we can discourage the continued misuse of these funds.…

    • 704 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The need for welfare among society today has become increasingly large. Although the need for welfare is rapidly increasing, so is the use of drugs. This is posing as a major problem for the welfare programs. Welfare programs are now trying to put into place a new qualification where any possible recipients of welfare are required to take a drug test. For the most part, welfare recipients respect the requirements of their contract with the agency. The drug testing will just be used to eliminate any persons taking advantage of the welfare program for inappropriate use and to ensure that the welfare will go to the people who are actually in need of it. While many are more than willing to take the drug tests, there are also quite a few who are very reluctant toward this new qualification. In order to decide whether or not drug testing is a logical and fair requirement, all the pros and cons need to be laid out on the table.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Money, we all know this is essential in the world we live in. would you go to a restaurant knowing you had no money in your pocket or bank account? Of course not because you know after the meal follows the bill. Working class people are already indebted to the governments ridiculous fees they deduct from each of your paychecks, knowing damn well you will never see social security or and type of 401k. You are throwing your money into a pit that promises no return, would you like an additional fee tacked onto the end of your paystub? Drug testing is not free hence why you go through a rigorous interviewing process prior to being hired to deem if you are worthy of the companies money to send out for a specimen of urine. It is estimated that random annual drug test for welfare recipients would cost tax payers an additional four-thousand dollars per year, individual not household. Could you not spend four grand on anything better than random drug test for those on welfare? There is no punishment for failing a drug test, besides…

    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are many welfare programs available to the public that a lot of individuals depend upon. Without access to certain benefits some people may not survive. Such benefits include food stamps, medical assistance, cash assistance, day care vouchers and job placement assistance. Although some may argue that there are people who take advantage of the welfare programs, there are plenty of people who require and appreciate the benefits provided. Recently there has been talk of drug testing welfare recipients. Because the public is concerned with welfare recipients taking advantage of the system they want to keep drug addicts from receiving benefits. This is a major controversy right now is our society but once investigated it is clear that welfare programs should not require mandatory drug testing.…

    • 2044 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should people who want welfare be required to take a drug test? People say the fourth amendment protects them because it states “ unreasonable searches and seizures.” Welfare drug testing is a common way to make sure taxpayer dollars are used responsibly. People who have to pay for other people’s welfare because they can go into work disagree with people who even have to think twice about drug testing being required to receive welfare. Taxpayers who pay on welfare think the government is responsible to make sure that their money is being used correctly and to make sure that drug users don’t receive any funds from the state. Why should we support their drug use, if you want drugs you should be able to pay for your own needs. We shouldn’t support basically feeding into their drugs use and letting them slowly kill themselves. Instead we should provide rehabs and hospital treatments. We don’t need to lock the addict up we need to get them help because they’re cable of so much more than what their setting their mindset do. They’re putting a limit to their goals and success in life. You can do…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people are constantly discussing the issue of welfare recipients abusing the system and spending their money on drugs while receiving government assistance. This issue has brought forward a possible solution of states passing legislation that will require welfare applicants to submit to a drug test before receiving any sort of government assistance. Drug testing welfare applicants before allowing them to receive assistance is a positive idea because most employers require drug tests to be taken by applicants pre-employment. This will help make sure that the government funding is being put toward the family and the needs of the household, and also because in the future it will benefit the children growing…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays