Argumentative Essay: Should The Kid Become Guilty?

The kid would have to be guilty, there was enough proof to prove he was guilty. The kid should be guilty because there was so much proof that he was guilty that its ridiculous. If the kid wasn’t guilty he could have had so much evidence to prove he wasn’t including the pockets that had the hole in them or the movie ticket he had when he watched the movie at the theaters. He didn’t have the movie ticket so he couldn’t prove he was at the movies at the time of the killing. He didn’t have the pants or whatever he was wearing that had the holes in the pocket to prove he lost his switch blade in there.
The kid went to the theaters the day of his fathers death and forgot what movie he watched. There could be no way he forgot what movie he watched
He supposedly lost it in his pocket because it had a hole in there. The knife he supposedly lost was the same knife that stabbed his father. 8th juror said “No. I'm saying it's possible that the boy lost the knife and that someone else stabbed his father with a similar knife. It's possible” (Rose 23) The day the kid bought the knife is the same day his father died. There is a big chance that didn’t happen, and if it did he could of proved he lost the knife by showing the actual clothing he had that had the hole in the pocket. That wouldn’t fully prove that he lost the knife that way, but it would of made the chance of him getting the death penalty way
You know - living in a slum, his mother dead since he was nine. He spent a year and a half in an orphanage while his father served a jail term for forgery. That's not a very good head start. He had a pretty terrible sixteen years. I think maybe we owe him a few words. That's all” (Rose 13). Which proves that he has been living a bad life and that there would be no surprise that he actually stabbed his dad. Since he lived that way he couldn’t learn from whats good and bad. He lived a bad life and also his dad was mean to him, theres a high chance that he stabbed his