Argumentative Essay: Should Organs Be Mandatory?

Organs are constantly needed around the world by dying patients and anxious doctors. Sadly, there isn’t enough donors so patients stuck in the waiting list are being left untreated because of the lack of organs. I believe donating should be forced to be mandatory everywhere because people don’t believe they need to. In reality it is our moral duty to help whoever is in need. I plan to present the benefits, problems, and solutions towards this controversial topic. Fairness is a great solution to this epidemic. By fairness, I mean whoever doesn’t donate won’t be a priority when it comes to the waiting list. People will be forced to give up a piece or whole organ to become a higher priority patient in the future. If one doesn’t then it is considered organ free-riding, a morally wrong action to do. This is a term stated by Steinberg, one of the critics against this current U.S. organ policy. Steinberg believes that everyone should do what they would others to do when they are in the same situation. He states,
If it is morally valuable for me to receive a kidney, objectivity requires that the donation of a kidney to someone else also be considered morally valuable. The ‘organ taker’ must decide whether they would be willing to perform the same morally valuable act as they …show more content…
Money and lives can be saved if organ donations were more prominent. With all the treatments need to keep a sick patient alive, the amount of money piles up on the hospital, meaning more taxes for everybody. The families affected have to schedule for appointments constantly, leading to less work. Less work means less income coming in. The family will have other issues to worry about besides their family member dying helplessly. Randolph, an author all for mandatory organ donation, explains what organ donations would help through the view of patients needing kidneys. He