Argumentative Essay: Should Children Be Banning Books?
Banning books may have a negative outcome for children, taking so much away that they could have learned. Minors should not be held in the dark from the appalling aspects in life. As they grow older, they will not be secured away from the real world. Adults may want to shield their kids from taking in “explicit” or “dirty” knowledge, yet eventually, children get older and become much more exposed to the details of the true world, not just from books. Books could very well have explicit content or profanity, but keeping those away from the younger children shouldn’t be a large deal; there is no need for them to be “banned”. There are several other ways for one’s mind to obtain this kind of knowledge, and no one’s lifting a finger to ban
…show more content…
Literature is art, it's how authors express themselves, and that would take that opportunity away from them. Taking that away from an author is like taking away their ability to speak through the pages as they had before. Just because what is in a book doesn’t appeal to someone else, and it wouldn’t be good for a child to read them, doesn’t mean there has to be any sort of ban on any book. Adults may attempt to prohibit books because of suggestive behavior being displayed in them, although kids should be allowed to figure out the wrong from the right by themselves during their lives. Younger children should not be able to have their hands on books with bad behavior and profanity, but as they get older, adults should not heavily guard them from such things. Children need to learn about censorship for themselves at younger ages, while they learn quickly and more efficiently. The right of escaping the real world and enjoying a simple book should never be taken away from any person. Adolescents could very well be having a hard time in their life, and books could potentially help them. This can apply to school, too. If someone doesn't have a lot of friends, they are able to dive into the book and feel like they are a part of something bigger.
Mankind should be able to read what books that they desire, as long as they are mature enough to handle the content. If they are kids or teenagers, they should be able to have the option of parental
Literature is art, it's how authors express themselves, and that would take that opportunity away from them. Taking that away from an author is like taking away their ability to speak through the pages as they had before. Just because what is in a book doesn’t appeal to someone else, and it wouldn’t be good for a child to read them, doesn’t mean there has to be any sort of ban on any book. Adults may attempt to prohibit books because of suggestive behavior being displayed in them, although kids should be allowed to figure out the wrong from the right by themselves during their lives. Younger children should not be able to have their hands on books with bad behavior and profanity, but as they get older, adults should not heavily guard them from such things. Children need to learn about censorship for themselves at younger ages, while they learn quickly and more efficiently. The right of escaping the real world and enjoying a simple book should never be taken away from any person. Adolescents could very well be having a hard time in their life, and books could potentially help them. This can apply to school, too. If someone doesn't have a lot of friends, they are able to dive into the book and feel like they are a part of something bigger.
Mankind should be able to read what books that they desire, as long as they are mature enough to handle the content. If they are kids or teenagers, they should be able to have the option of parental