Some people say the driving age should be raised because teens are dangerous drivers. Part of that is true, but adults are dangerous drivers too. Whether it be they are just not good drivers overall or they could be driving while intoxicated. Teens need to be able to drive to get to their job, school and anywhere else they need to go. Also, teens are not the dangerous drivers they are made out to be. They are less likely to be driving while intoxicated compared to an…
Did you know that 20% of crashes involve teen drivers? Well, they do and something needs to be done about it. A couple of suggested ideas are that the driving age should be changed to 18, or to have graduated licenses (GDL’s). Instead of waiting until teenagers turn 18, it would be better to have GDL’s so that they have more driving experience, they would have a shorter waiting period than waiting until they are 18, and there would be more checkpoints to see how capable they are to drive. These are all reasons there should be GDL’s.…
I do not believe the minimum driving age should be raised. A trend in recent years has shown that the amount of 16-17 year olds involved in deadly car crashes has been reduced, and 18-19 year olds involved in deadly accidents has increased. In states with Graduating License programs, the amount of 16 year olds involved in deadly accidents has gone down 16 percent. A GDL (Graduating License) can restrict teens from driving at night, with passengers, and it can make them drive with supervision for a given amount of time. This will give teens safe and quality experience behind the wheel. Since 1996, 1,348 fewer fatalities involving 16 year olds and 1,086 more fatalities involving 18 year olds have been linked to Graduating License programs. So, why would we raise the license limit to 18 or 19 when fewer 16 and 17 year olds, and more 18-19 year olds are causing fatal accidents (Roan)?…
The loss of life is always a tragedy, especially if it is a life cut short. So anything that could prevent such tragedies from occurring are almost always brought into effect. Case in point many states have placed restrictions on anyone under 18 as to what they are allowed to do behind the wheel of a car. These restrictions were seen as the right way to cut the amount of fatal car accidents involving 16-17 year old drivers and for the most part it did. With these restrictions the there appeared a reduction of fatal accidents involving young drivers by 26% as found by the Department of Motor Vehicles and Development Branch in Sacramento. But these restriction have also brought an unforeseen consequence, an increase by 12% of fatal accidents involving 18 year old drives. With this research it seems that the restrictions placed on young drivers and the idea of raising the legal driving age would trade in one set of problems for a new set. So I say it is better to stick with the devil you know then the one you don’t.…
The April 22, 2005 newspaper article is headlined, Teenager Dies in Crash, in Knoxville, Tennessee: just another victim of inexperienced teenage driving who adds to the high statistics on casualties resulting from inefficient laws. According to the teen driving statistics that are provided by the insurance companies, 16 year-olds are three times more likely to die in a motor vehicle crash than individuals who fall within the range of the average age of all drivers. Therefore, I think the legal driving age should be raised to 18. One thing I've found is that it isn't necessarily the age, but that they are inexperienced. The driver's ed classes are also factors. The classes need to emphasis more on driving safely for the rest of your life. Although reckless teenage driving has recently resulted in couple tragic deaths, most teens are mature enough and knowledgeable of safety on the road. Safety and financial problems will get better by raising the legal driving age to 18.…
For sixteen years, teenagers look forward to the day they get the ultimate freedom: driving, but with this freedom there comes risks. Every day another life is lost to teen driving. Along with risking their lives, teenagers are also not mentally prepared to handle the consequences that could come with driving. They are not only putting their life at risk, but the lives of others. No mother or father wants to bury their child, and this would be less likely if the driving age was raised. The legal driving age should be raised to save lives and have more mature drivers on the road.…
In California and in almost every other state teens are eager to start driving and are excited to get their driver's license whether it’s to drive to the theaters or go to the store to buy some things, teens want the privilege to drive themselves anywhere at anytime they want, but with the freedom comes responsibility too. Each year they are hundreds of car related accidents which can result in death or serious injuries. Out of those hundreds of accidents most involve young drivers around the ages of 15 and 19, because of most accidents are caused or involve a teen or young driver many people believe and would strongly argue that the driving age should be raised but I would strongly argue back that it shouldn’t, it should be kept the way it is but with a little change in…
Changing the driving age to 18 does nothing but change their age if you leave it alone and leaving the driving age to 16 with more practice time behind the wheel will give them some responsibilities and more freedom to themselves. Soon they will become adults and need to have their responsibilities in order to keep them up with the rest of the world and keep themselves together. Do you think the 16 year olds can learn responsibilities young or do you prefer safer streets with possible irresponsible…
The idea of raising the driving age to prevent traffic accidents is quite the issue. Many different arguments can form when such an idea arises. Virginia laws have teens getting their permit at fifteen and nine months, holding the permit for a minimum of nine months, and not being able to get their licenses until they’re at least sixteen and three months. Raising the driving age from sixteen to eighteen is absolutely preposterous and makes no sense. Young teens need to be able to drive themselves to work, school, and numerous other functions when their parents are unavailable. New drivers and traffic incidents are inevitable; they will happen no matter the age or experience of the driver. College kids are just as much at risk as younger…
While driving at sixteen does have many benefits, many people are concerned that sixteen year olds aren’t mature enough to be able to drive. They believe that we cause too many accidents and that it would be better to wait until we are a bit older to start driving. While these accusations do have a premise the ideology that teens are inevitably going to turn into careless, unsafe drivers is false. While there are many cases of teens doing reckless acts while driving such as drinking,…
Raising the Driving Age to 18 In the world today one of the most exciting parts of growing up is getting your driver’s license. Everyone counts on getting their sweet 16 car and license, but is that really the important part? Well yes as all teenagers would say. Even though it comes to losing their life because of inexperience, and immaturity on the road. There are lots of reasons why the driving age should be raised. ”All 50 states prohibit 16-year-olds from drinking alcohol, buying cigarettes, and purchasing handguns. Yet somehow most states are willing to put them in charge of a car, which could potentially be a deadly weapon.”(Amico). Driving is one of the leading causes of death for teenagers, their brain is not fully developed, and with more drivers on the road that is more pollution to the earth.…
In general, since teens are allowed to get there license when they are sixteen years old, lowering the drinking age to eighteen would cause many car related accidents due to drinking and driving. After the drinking age was lowered in the 1970’s researchers discovered a trend between the drinking age and the number of car related injuries. Alexander C. Wagenaar and Traci L. Toomey, two well-known PH.D’s and authors of Effects of Minimum Drinking Age Laws: Review and Analyses of the Literature from 1960 to 2000, the drinking age should not be lowered:…
Because of safety concerns, many states have increased the age at which teens can begin to drive. Some teenagers at the age of 16 are responsible. Some 16 year olds are irresponsible. Also, all 18 year olds are not responsible and able to drive the correct way. The state legislature should not raise the minimum age from 16 to 18 because some 16 year olds have a job and need transportation, a few may not like to depend on individuals to drive them back and forth, and many teenagers like to do their own things and not always with their parents.…
One reason why minimum driving age should be raised is because teenagers have more time to take advantage of driving programs that will help them get prepared before getting behind the wheel. A common problem among 16 to 18 year olds is they wait until they turn 18 to get a license without having any driving school requirements, and they skip all the restrictions according to Source 2 Paragraph 7. Teens rather avoid all the…
Studies prove that statistically 16-17 year olds are twice as likely to get in to car crashes verses 18-19 year olds. 16 year old drivers are simply too young to be allowed to drive, 18 is the legal age for almost everything else. The driving age should be raised. 16 year olds lose control of their vehicle because they are beginners. They shout require at least 2 years of training because automobile accidents are dangerous and there could be a lot more if we don’t enforce this.…