Argumentative Essay On Organ Sales
Organ Sales Currently, the United States is facing a crisis. On average, 20 people are dying every day because there is a shortage of organs. Right now, to receive an organ, one must wait for an organ donor to die, or receive an organ from someone who is willing to give up one of theirs. With technology and medical advances, organ transplants are becoming more successful, effective, and safe. For those reasons, many people would be willing to sell an organ to a complete stranger. But right now, it is illegal for someone to sell their organs. In turn, this has created a black market for organs, and from this, it has caused chaos in some countries. There needs to be a legal market for organs because it will actually help the economy,
…show more content…
When it comes to being immoral, opponents also tend to include that it is against their religion. This is a matter of state and religious views that are separate, making this argument is void. With it being immoral, that is hard to understand because currently it is legal to sell ones sperm, blood plasma, and other body parts/functions. It is also legal to use a surrogate mother. If someone wants to sell their own organs, then they should be able to sell their own organs to save a life. Opponents think that there will be businesses that will pursue organs for donation. It will then escalate so bad that people will turn to violence to get organs from people so they can sell them. These opponents think that the government will allow a market without regulations. Of course the government will regulate this. They will have set prices, restrictions which will probably include that the organ seller must also be the organ donor so stealing someone else’s organ would be completely pointless. Another argument made against the market is the fact that the procedure is dangerous. When a donor is making the decision, they’re usually made aware of the dangers and have to sign a waiver. Same will go for those who sell. Opponents also tend to argue that transplants don’t extend a person’s life for that much longer. According to government statistics, the majority of people are still living five years after the operation. Specifically these statistics include 69.3% of kidney operations, 74.9% of the heart, 73.8% of the liver, and 54.4% of the lung. From this, one can conclude that these transplants do help significantly in prolonging one’s life. (Analyses* what does this mean?) This argument the opposition makes can be easily dismissed. (Why can these be
When it comes to being immoral, opponents also tend to include that it is against their religion. This is a matter of state and religious views that are separate, making this argument is void. With it being immoral, that is hard to understand because currently it is legal to sell ones sperm, blood plasma, and other body parts/functions. It is also legal to use a surrogate mother. If someone wants to sell their own organs, then they should be able to sell their own organs to save a life. Opponents think that there will be businesses that will pursue organs for donation. It will then escalate so bad that people will turn to violence to get organs from people so they can sell them. These opponents think that the government will allow a market without regulations. Of course the government will regulate this. They will have set prices, restrictions which will probably include that the organ seller must also be the organ donor so stealing someone else’s organ would be completely pointless. Another argument made against the market is the fact that the procedure is dangerous. When a donor is making the decision, they’re usually made aware of the dangers and have to sign a waiver. Same will go for those who sell. Opponents also tend to argue that transplants don’t extend a person’s life for that much longer. According to government statistics, the majority of people are still living five years after the operation. Specifically these statistics include 69.3% of kidney operations, 74.9% of the heart, 73.8% of the liver, and 54.4% of the lung. From this, one can conclude that these transplants do help significantly in prolonging one’s life. (Analyses* what does this mean?) This argument the opposition makes can be easily dismissed. (Why can these be