Argumentative Essay On Net Neutrality

When paying for internet the issue that comes up, is the amount of internet we are purchasing but never the speed. Net Neutrality is often referred to as Open Internet; Open Internet is the ability to use the internet in any way you want, whenever you want, and also everyone having the same speed. A new debate has come up in the Federal Communications Commissions (FCC) whether internet providers should create “fast lanes” for an extra cost or if the internet should be equal to all (CITE). Republicans and Democrats have been actively involved in the dispute. The outcome of this debate will affects the majority of Americans and their day to day lives. Net Neutrality will have positive effects on the internet and the way it functions. The first
One of the main ones is to stop big companies such as Comcast and Verizon Wireless from charging average Americans an outrageous amount of money to services and options they already possess. Net Neutrality would help large corporations from further monopolizing the broadband industry. If given the leeway to create “fast lanes” or throttling certain pages, companies will be able to extort money from mostly the middle class American. The World Wide Web was created to help bring in a different form of freedom of expression and speech; maintaining the internet open and neutral would aid the internet in the goal of creating a community of freedom. On the other hand, by not having Net Neutrality, the internet would become more private. By the internet not being open anymore, it eliminates large companies having access to users’ private information. It will also create a safe, more private internet for Americans to use. Without Net Neutrality, people would have to acquire special permission to create services and programs; this would stop digital content piracy and hacking. If Net Neutrality is banned then the main purpose, which is to create a community where different topics can be conversed upon, is
The debate was whether or not phone line providers should charge more for a separate line that receives calls quicker. The debate was very similar to the current one; political parties where taking opposite sides and the debate became heavily publicized. After encountering many ways of solving the debate, everyone came to the agreement to categorize phone lines as a public utility.
As society progresses, there will be an infinite amount of items and services that seem crucial for day to day lives. A public utility is defined as “A business that furnishes an everyday necessity to the public at large”, but what actually defines a necessity? A necessity is something you need to live such as water, food, and