Preview

Argumentative Essay On All Animals Are Equal By Peter Singer

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
904 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Argumentative Essay On All Animals Are Equal By Peter Singer
The Ultimate Right The ever-lasting clash of interests between man and beast, man of one color and man of another has been going on forever. It is hard to recognize that “All Animals are Equal” simply because everyone is selfish. People will always promote the survival of their own, and have prejudice to a different color, or species simply because they want to promote their self interest. Though all the discrimination arguments should be handled through utilitarianism: one life equals one life, no matter of species, more often than not humans utilize egoism to make their arguments. I believe that Singer is right in his argument because ultimately, life is not a game and everyone only has one chance. Whether it be a homo-sapiens, a canis-familiaris, …show more content…
Peter Singer debunked this argument with phenomenal finesse in my opinion by bringing attention back to the understanding of happiness and satisfaction. Though it may be true that cows, dogs, and horses are not capable of the same levels of life as we are, they are certainly capable of leading satisfactory or unsatisfactory lives. If they can feel pain and they are capable of displaying fear, why would they not be able to understand pleasure and happiness? I think his ideology of imbeciles in the spectrum of discrimination is pure genius. Most people are sensitive and kind to those with disabilities, but then why are people mean and cruel to those of different skin color. They can bring about the same value and have the same feelings and the same need for love and …show more content…
People that fight for human equality and sex equality, but gorge on steak and chicken meat are simply immoral hypocrites. However it is not the consumer that is always at fault. In this day and age, it is mostly the producer. The majority of the populace has no idea how these animals are treated and how low their quality of life really is. The best way to solve this would be to have everyone who wants to eat meat have to kill to get their own meat. The fear and panic and the pain witnessed in the animals might be enough to get the majority to understand that life is life no matter in what shape or color. This is a justification for the hypocrites, most are not aware of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Animals deserve rights because just like humans, they feel excruciating pain, suffer and have feelings. One would argue that animals don’t experience emotions? But the answer is of course they do. It is emotions that allow animals to display various behavior patterns. According to the theory of utilitarianism, all sentient beings should be given consideration in the society and this includes both animals and humans. Also, animals cannot speak for themselves and for this reason they should be treated equally, protected and given the same respect as human beings. Peter singer’s approach also supports the argument on equal consideration in that animals deserve the same respect as human beings but just in a different view. In today’s society humans exploit animals for milk, meat, fur, scientific experimentation etc. and animals are constantly injured or killed. Their pain and sufferings should be taken into consideration, as this unjust treatment is morally unacceptable. Similarly speciesism is an…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bill McKibben’s essay “The Only Way to Have a Cow” establishes a sense of comfort as his approach to the meat eating controversy is superbly logical. The current industrial approach to livestock has birthed an issue pertaining to the sustainability and healthy feeding of our lives. Yet there is another problem in relation to our consumption, which tends to be overlooked. If the pricing of meat reflected in the damage done to our environments, feedlot beef would cost more than grass-fed beef both financially and environmentally. It is the rapid, inhumane dietary feeding of the cow which is insulting, not the consumption of it, and taking no responsibility for the run-off is an offense to the earth and it’s inhabitants. These costs alone are part of the reasoning for the current system which is inefficient and uneconomically feasible. The…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our gustatory pleasure is not as important as the lives of animals. The example used in the article to explain this argument was the “Torturing Puppies” argument. Anyone who has compassion and emotions would agree that saving the lives of the puppies is the right thing to do, as opposed to killing them just for a momentary, gustatory experience. This is the same with the meat farms and consumers. Many animals such as chickens are ripped off of their beaks. Baby cows are put in cages to make their meat tender by not allowing their bones and muscles to grow. Pig’s tails are cut off and are subject to enclosed spaces. The living conditions of these animals are poor. Hormones are being injected into animals, negatively affecting the consumer’s overall health. All of this torture, just to kill these animals for gustatory pleasure, seems just as bad as the puppy example mentioned…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first premise of his argument was that all human and non-human animals possess equal inherent value because they are all individuals experiencing life. His second premise is that possessing inherent value demands that these individuals have rights that should not be violated by others. The final premise of his argument is that any individual with rights must be treated equally and with respect. In this paper, I objected to his third premise by arguing that we humans should not interact with animals at all because we are not able to distinguish their perception of equality and…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article “A Change of Heart about Animals” by Jeremy Rifkin, behavioral scientist Stephen M. Sivy poses an important question all individuals should contemplate. “If you believe in evolution by natural selection, how can you believe that feelings suddenly appeared, out of the blue, with human beings?” The human race is not significantly different to the point where we must distinguish ourselves from alternative species. Many people seem to be under the impression that animals exist solely to serve our intentions, regardless of the detrimental effects they undergo. We as humans tend to classify ourselves to be at the top of the species hierarchy due to our moral compass and superior intellect.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Letter to the Editor

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I feel that mostly everything in the world becomes natural and the natural part is hunting animals, which shouldn’t be done in the first place. Companies such as McDonald’s, Burger King, and KFC use animal meat for their fast-foods and people eat them. Makes me feel that if their eating animals that have flesh n blood, then why not eat humans because technically humans are also meat. So why not just eat yourself then?…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It gives basic moral significance to things that are able to experience pain and pleasure. Human’s and non humans can most certainly experience pain and pleasure therefore we all deserve equality. Singer argues that we have a direct duty to animals, to include their interest in our moral reasoning. Whether or not animals can author treatises on mathematics they like us feel pain and we therefore have an obligation not to cause them needless suffering. Singer denounces all forms of what he calls “speciesism” whereby human beings believe they can exploit animals merely because they do not belong to the species homo sapiens. Just because animals aren’t homo sapiens doesn’t mean they are not equal. They have hearts, they pump blood, they breathe and they create life, these are all qualities us humans…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However does morality only pull with the “slenderest of threads”? There is a small population of people that steer clear of animal products because of morale. In an excerpt from Singer’s Animal Liberation, he discusses the human tendency to demonstrate “speciesism,” which he describes as the bias to favor the interests of one’s own kind and show no regard for the interests of other species. Which if true, then this would explain why most people consume meat, and why today’s meat industry is violent and merciless to cattle and other animals, causing them to suffer a great deal. However it doesn’t explain how people like Singer can resist this tendency. Singer points to Jeremy Bentham who wrote that “the capacity for suffering [is] the vital…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For many years, the debate of whether animals have moral rights or not has been thrown around court rooms, social media, and protests. Arguments are made defending animals and suggesting that they should be protected and recognized in human society. Medical researchers are scrutinized and harassed by these supporters for their part in animal testing and medical investigation. Scientific breakthroughs have been made, which has transformed the development of modern medicine. Lifespans have elongated and lives are being saved in every corner of the world, yet somehow, this is still debated as if it is the wrong thing to do. Research animals are pertinent tools of the medical world and humans are entitled to use them as such. As human beings with…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thoreau Transcendentalism

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I eat meat and quite often and don't think much of it when I do but that’s what society has done to us. We don't think what we do, we think what everyone else thinks whether its where our food comes from or for example; if we should go to college. And this is what Thoreau was trying to say, that people are far to heavily influenced and that was 160 years ago. Now there are so many ways for people to control us, from news to music to our family.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should animals have rights? A lot of people would say no because humans are the top 10% of the food chain,so does this give us the right to take away animal rights? The answer is yes , imagine a society where humans, who are superior to animals, have to abide to the same rules as an animal. Animals should not have a bill of rights because God gave humans superiority over other animals, Animals don't respect our rights, If animals have rights, then so do vegetables, and humans and animals differ greatly.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Singer argues that the basic principle of equality doesn’t mean that we have to treat all groups of beings the exact same way or afford them the same rights. He uses the example of women and men being treated equally but not giving men the right to have an abortion because they don’t need that right. He argues that we should give equal consideration to all beings and that equality shouldn’t depend on moral capacity, intelligence, or physical traits. These factual differences shouldn’t determine how someone is treated. He says that human’s should not discriminate against other humans with a lower degree of intelligence and therefore should not discriminate against nonhuman animals. Lastly, he argues that when deciding whether or not we…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Vegetarians aren't the only ones who push their beliefs onto other people. Meat eaters do it too; although, they are not a persuasive and aggressive. The 1998 “Where’s The Beef?”article by Alan Herscovici takes a lighter approach to show audiences eating meat is not as bad as it is…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What does Singer mean by saying that all animals are equal? What does he mean by "speciesism," and how is it like racism and sexism?…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Regan, Tom. "Animal Rights, Human Wrongs." Forming a Critical Perspective. Boston, MA: Pearson Learning Solutions, 2010. 336-40. Print.…

    • 1234 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays