Argumentative Essay: Gun Control Should Not Be In Force
James W. Whitehead
Mrs. Ross
Pre AP ELA 1
December 4, 2015
Gun control should not be in force because it only affects the people who follow the laws. If weapons were banned, that is, putting gun control into effect, the people who follow laws won’t be able to protect themselves from people who don’t abide by the laws. The main purposes of fire arms is self- protection and hunting. So if the government tries to take our weapons away from us we can just throw the 2nd amendment at them and tell them that this is unconstitutional. We understand they are trying to cut down on crime, but it is actually making the crime rates go up. In Britain the government thought it would bring the crime/murder rate down but, it actually increased about 1 million more deaths each year. The government is trying to get is ammo they are trying to limit ammo manufactures to a certain amount of ammo a day. They are also making people go into havoc and making them go crazy over ammo, so people are buying …show more content…
If weapons were banned, that is, putting gun control into effect, the people who follow laws won’t be able to protect themselves from people who don’t abide by the laws. The main purposes of fire arms is self- protection and hunting. So don’t enforce gun control/laws because they only affect the law abiding citizens. The law abiding citizens may need their weapons to protect their family from the non-law abiding citizens or they need them to put food on the table because, they may not have enough money to afford meat. Then they wouldn’t be able to get enough protein and there is enough starving people in the USA/World. (wacotrib.com)Weapons is one of the best ways to bond with family/friends. Facts show that youth who spend time with their family have more common sense. Since they have more common sense they won’t go crazy. So having a good relationship with family is a good
Mrs. Ross
Pre AP ELA 1
December 4, 2015
Gun control should not be in force because it only affects the people who follow the laws. If weapons were banned, that is, putting gun control into effect, the people who follow laws won’t be able to protect themselves from people who don’t abide by the laws. The main purposes of fire arms is self- protection and hunting. So if the government tries to take our weapons away from us we can just throw the 2nd amendment at them and tell them that this is unconstitutional. We understand they are trying to cut down on crime, but it is actually making the crime rates go up. In Britain the government thought it would bring the crime/murder rate down but, it actually increased about 1 million more deaths each year. The government is trying to get is ammo they are trying to limit ammo manufactures to a certain amount of ammo a day. They are also making people go into havoc and making them go crazy over ammo, so people are buying …show more content…
If weapons were banned, that is, putting gun control into effect, the people who follow laws won’t be able to protect themselves from people who don’t abide by the laws. The main purposes of fire arms is self- protection and hunting. So don’t enforce gun control/laws because they only affect the law abiding citizens. The law abiding citizens may need their weapons to protect their family from the non-law abiding citizens or they need them to put food on the table because, they may not have enough money to afford meat. Then they wouldn’t be able to get enough protein and there is enough starving people in the USA/World. (wacotrib.com)Weapons is one of the best ways to bond with family/friends. Facts show that youth who spend time with their family have more common sense. Since they have more common sense they won’t go crazy. So having a good relationship with family is a good