Preview

Argumentative Analysis: The Obama Administration

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1396 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Argumentative Analysis: The Obama Administration
Donna Skipper
English 3001
Professor Sapoznikov
10/27/12

Since the decreased use of drone from the Bush to the Obama administration, many people are wondering whether or not drone strike have been beneficial to the United Stats and the countries they are protecting. Considering the countless lives taken and the anger towards the United States, on the other hand, many people would agree that a strong military defense is vital in securing the safety of all Americans and their allies. How ever so is long-term peace and stability for one’s country, which the Obama administration has not been able to deliver in the Middle East. Although this may be true that the Obama administration has achieved its goal by disrupting terrorist plots
…show more content…
Khan who were the two primary targets with Al-Awlaki sixteen year old son who was caught in the cross fire. Family members of the suspects filed a lawsuit in court claiming there family members were denied the right to judicial process as an American citizen. According to Attorney General Eric Holder, the families were denied justice based on a law that stated the government has a right to kill an American citizen without any judicial process under certain circumstances. Many people were upset that they were not taken into custody and tried through a judicial system as many Americans who were found guilty of similar crimes in the past. Obviously there was evidence to show they were affiliated with Al Quida and have obstructed justice prior to the killing them. According to Mr. Holder the General Attorney, it was not feasible to capture them any ways considering the cost to house them and prosecute them. How ever, they were Americans and as American they should have been captured and prosecuted under the judicial laws, so they can tell their side of the story and the American people can decide whether or not they are guilty of a crime as we do in any other situation. I feel the judicial system is in place for a reason and should be applied to everyone including terrorist because it give closure to the victims and their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The Great Depression of the 1930’s was the worst economic period in the history of the United States. Taking over the presidency in 1932, three years after the Depression began, Franklin Delano Roosevelt became responsible for leading America’s quest to escape the Depression. Roosevelt passed the New Deal in an attempt to help the nation recover through a series of initiatives focused on economic recovery. While most people would agree that the New Deal had a definite impact on the United States throughout the early-1930’s, there are some critics that think that the New Deal prolonged the Great Depression. These critics believe that different initiatives could have returned the United States to prosperity much sooner, and that the Depression would’ve continued much longer if not for the start of World War II.…

    • 1990 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As seen in figure 1., the manifestation of neoliberal ideals is clearly demonstrated in this screenshot. In the comment written by Prakoso, the reasoning behind wanting immigrants to enter the country is consistent with the reasons in a neoliberal lens. Prakoso emphasizes the importance of immigrants contributing to the economy and how this could be done with an effective filter. This is translated more clearly through the requirements incoming immigrants must meet in order to enter Canada because of the focus on global competitiveness and economic growth. This view is not specific to Prakoso as highlighted in a CBC article written by Angus Reid. In the article, it is said that, “the vast majority of Canadians prefer a policy that will enhance…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    CIA drone strikes have the potential to decimate terrorist organizations in an inexpensive manner and reduces boots on the ground combat for American soldiers. Though, we need expansive and additional congressional oversight of drone strikes and CIA targeting. The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) is devoted to regulating and reviewing every aspect of the drone program, however, committee members are often met with denial and restriction of information. We need to make sure our drone program is met with regulation and preemptive strikes must be strictly reviewed in a legal manner prior to, in order to prevent the endangerment of innocent civilians, radicalization and mobilization of extremest retaliation, and to preserve the reputation…

    • 117 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drone Warfare, enacted by George Bush and expanded on by President Obama to provide a haven for Americans against the terrorist group, al-Qaeda. The use of weaponized unmanned surveillance drones allowed for far better independent targeting decisions, rather than retrieving intelligence from sources within the real country where the warfare would take place. These strategic implications created a question among Americans, is the use of drones to target individuals right? This question has arisen due to a high number of civilian casualties, making it seem inhumane to do. However, Kenneth Anderson provides readers a strong argument as to why drone warfare is strategically effective in his article, “The Case for Drones” with his organization pattern,…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plaw states that one point in favor of drones is that they are weakening Al Qaeda, the taliban and affiliated groups. Also, they have a primary responsibility for protecting their own civilians. “Second, I doubt that ending drone strikes would substantially reduce anti-Americanism in the Islamic world or put a dent in radical recruitment.” However, that might be true, but they are still costing the lives of innocent civilians of those lives being women and children. Plaw says that to avoid these casualties drones can be sent out with a clearer justification of what it is going to do. He also explains that the drones are a lot less harmful to civilians then they are to Al Qaeda affiliates. The civilian casualties can be minimized therefore drones aren’t as dangerous as some…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the discussion on Washington Week, Gwen Ifil and her colleagues focused on Donald Trump, Marco Rubio, and Ted Cruz. The Republicans had their last debate before Super Tuesday and both Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz just attacked Donald Trump. This time Donald Trump couldn't seem to defend himself, but have no fear, Chris Christie is here. Chris Christie gladly gave an endorsement to Donald Trump to help him bounce back from the shakey debate. John Harwood thought you can't get anymore mainstream than the governor of New Jersey. Gwen Ifill responded with "Endorsements don't do much," but because both Trump and Christie like the spotlight they are a perfect match. As Super Tuesday started approaching, the candidates started doing their best…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drone Home Analysis

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Drones are capable of being used by terrorists and other criminals for their bad intentions. For example, in the article “Drone Home” on page 7, Lev Grossman points out the possible security concerns revolving the domestic use of drones.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    These machines destroy many enemy camps that contain the Al-Qaeda in places such as Somalia and Afghanistan. Drones also “have done so at little financial cost, at no risk to U.S. forces, and with fewer civilian casualties than many alternative methods would have caused.” (Byman). In the face of the riots all around the nation, Obama has called the reduction in America’s reliance to these machines even though they will still remain the government’s main weapon of choice for international warfare. These machines have done the task of killing the main leaders of the terrorist organization that has haunted us for many years and have denied the life of many of their sanctuaries. Knowing that this information was spread around the world, the citizens of America became more accepting of keeping the production of this new technology alive and to make it as strong as ever. Although it has not been the most approved program the military could use, the biggest advantage is that it actually works and it is the most efficient program for terminating enemy troops that the military has ever invested billions of dollars for. Many politicians and regular civilians “think it fair to say that the targeted killing program has been the most precise and effective application of firepower in the history of armed conflict.” (Hayden). From this quote, the reality of war has brought upon the competition of seeing which country’s military can create the strongest weapon possible. Since Al-Qaeda has started the War on Terrorism with America, Obama and the government have worked for many months on created these drones to help reduce the risk of terrorists towards the civilians. According to Michael Lewis, Drones used for war is actually the most humane forms of warfare that could…

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that the Presidential Election of 2000 was illegitimate. The reason is because there were 175,000 declared uncountable ballots that were either dimpled or hanging Chads (1). Additionally, if these votes were hand counted, I believe that Al Gore would have been ahead and would have won the state of Florida. Additionally, the state of Florida had a purge list of 20,000 US citizens that were unable to vote (1). For example, if a Florida citizen had the same name as a convicted felon, and/or initials, the list captured their name and automatically placed it on the purge list. Because of this list, many people were turned away at the polls on election day. In the state of Florida, there are 67 counties and 18 of those counties chose…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drone Strikes Iran

    • 102 Words
    • 1 Page

    For some time now, the US has been considering whether or not to use drone strikes…

    • 102 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I chose to use the 2012 Presidential General Election, because I remember this election the most detailed. The candidates running for the democratic side were Barack Obama for president and Joe Biden for vice president. Running for the republican side were Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan. The presidential candidates for the libertarian party were Gary Johnson and his vice presidential candidate James Gary. The overall winner(s) of the 2012 Presidential election was/were President Barak Obama and Vice President Joe Biden.…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drones are not helpful towards the military, there are many reasons behind this statement. Drone strikes help create more problems and killers than stop them, drones could even kill or seriously injure people who are not even terrorists (Drones). Drones could kill thousands, maybe even a whole population of people, and traumatize everybody who survives. Drone strikes make it so the United States do not even go to war, they can get out of fighting and the horrors of war (Drones). There should not be devices like this flying around, especially when it comes to people's lives.…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On Saturday hundreds of Trump supports descended on the National Mall in Washington, DC to attend the Mother of All Rallies, a gathering of conservatives, focusing on voicing their support President Trump.…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why drones Fail summary

    • 707 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In ”Why Drones Fail”, published in Foreign Affairs, the author Audrey Kurth Cronin, Professor of Public Policy at George Mason University, discuss and argues why she believes that drones aren’t a working strategy in the long-term for the U.S. in their war against terrorism. She examines if the unmanned aerial vehicle actually fulfill the three main goals that are in counterterrorism’s best interest. Firstly, Audrey discuss the strategic defeat of al Qaeda, where she mentions the fact that drone strikes might not be the most efficient way to defeat the 25-year old organization. For instance, she explains how they’ve only succeeded killing about 50-100 al Qaeda members with 350 drone strikes. She also mentions that in previous similar cases the most effective way of intruding a terrorist group, such as al Qaeda, has been to capture their leader and in that way finding out their plans, how they would proceed it and who would be involved. Audrey also points out that drones work best where group members and the general population can be easily separated, which is a difficulty in the areas where U.S. use their drones. Therefore, she believes that not killing civilians is inevitable. Secondly, Audrey investigates if the conflicts actually stay local, or if they in fact breed new enemies. She brings out that even though America use drones as an advanced strategy it may only make local insurgents to join harmless jihadist organizations to help attack the U.S. because of their eager for vengeance. She explains that according to different polls over the years it has been shown that there are barely any countries supporting drones as a strategy. According to her it’s shown that UK, India and the U.S. are the only nations seeing drones as an effective and useful strategy in the matter. So since neither Europe nor any Muslim majority country seem to support America’s biggest investment in the counterterrorism program at the time, they fear that they’ll soon have more enemies…

    • 707 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The debate of whether or not drones are an ethical form of warfare can be viewed from many standpoints. For the sake of my argument I will focus in on the fact that drones cause less civilian causalities and how it is able to save more lives while still conducting warfare. This paper will discuss the ratios of civilian causticities in drone strikes compared to traditional forms of warfare. I will also discuss the ethics of using drones and the effect it has on civilians and the public image of the U.S and other western nations. Lastly I will compare drone warfare to other forms of warfare used in recent history to justify the ethical use of drone warfare as well as how it has altered modern warfare and saves lives by removing soldiers…

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays